Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 11:14 PM Dec 2012

Question about legal pot in CO & WA

So, lots of employers get discounts on various forms of insurance for having a "drug free workplace." To document this, they urine test employees. Often, it's just a one-time test at the outset of employment, but some employers randomly test (especially drivers). Did either state address this in their laws? Will employers still be able to deny all or some employments based on a positive test for Marijuana?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question about legal pot in CO & WA (Original Post) OmahaBlueDog Dec 2012 OP
No, this was not addressed in the law in WA. Suich Dec 2012 #1
So what if you would use pot while on vacation in CO doc03 Dec 2012 #2
There's a company in Ohio that tests you for nicotine and fires you if you come up positive RomneyLies Dec 2012 #3
Wow, where are we Russia? doc03 Dec 2012 #4
Well, my company bans drinks at lunch! I am ok with that. Logical Dec 2012 #5
Nope, it's called "Scott's" RomneyLies Dec 2012 #6
You can be fired for smoking tobacco jberryhill Dec 2012 #7

Suich

(10,642 posts)
1. No, this was not addressed in the law in WA.
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 12:29 AM
Dec 2012

Last edited Sun Dec 9, 2012, 02:40 AM - Edit history (1)

It remains to be seen how this affects the employer/employee relationship. There seem to be a lot more questions than answers now. The Governor is working with Holder's office and the Washington State Liquor Control Board is working on a plan to determine growers, distributors, etc. They estimate it will take the better part of a year.

So far, the only definite thing I've seen, is that the Seattle Police have said they will ignore possession of less than an ounce for people over 21.

On edit, just found this article:

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Legal-pot-complicates-drug-free-work-policies-182611111.html

doc03

(35,321 posts)
2. So what if you would use pot while on vacation in CO
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 12:46 AM
Dec 2012

and your employer in Ohio finds it in a test and fires you? They fire you in Ohio because it is an illegal drug but you never broke any laws in CO. The company I worked for changed hands and the new owner took hair samples and fired a co-worker of mine with 35 years service.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
3. There's a company in Ohio that tests you for nicotine and fires you if you come up positive
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 01:00 AM
Dec 2012

Legality of drugs doesn't matter.

courts have upheld it, too.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
6. Nope, it's called "Scott's"
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 01:16 AM
Dec 2012

And if you partake of nicotine, you are GONE!

So drug testing policies regarding cannabis are fine even if it's 100% legal naitonwide.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. You can be fired for smoking tobacco
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 01:43 AM
Dec 2012

I don't see what the legality of pot has to do with it. There are employers who do not hire tobacco smokers either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about legal pot ...