HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Supreme Court to decide s...

Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:53 PM

Supreme Court to decide same-sex marriage

FYI ...

http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/High-Court-to-take-up-same-sex-marriage-4100171.php

The U.S. Supreme Court took up the issue of same-sex marriage Friday, agreeing to decide whether gays and lesbians can wed in California and whether the federal government can deny benefits to married same-sex couples.

After weeks of indecision, the justices granted hearings to supporters of California's Proposition 8, which defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman, and the 1996 federal law known as the Defense of Marriage Act. It withholds federal recognition and spousal benefits, including joint tax filing and Social Security survivor payments, to more than 100,000 same-sex couples who married under their state's laws.

The cases will be argued early next year, with rulings due by the end of June. It's not clear, however, whether the court will decide the broader question of whether the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection of the laws gives gays and lesbians equal marriage rights in all states.

That question was not addressed by the federal appeals courts that declared both Prop. 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.

4 replies, 507 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Supreme Court to decide same-sex marriage (Original post)
RKP5637 Dec 2012 OP
customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #1
RKP5637 Dec 2012 #2
RudynJack Dec 2012 #3
customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #4

Response to RKP5637 (Original post)

Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:01 PM

1. I hope this isn't coming to the Court prematurely

While it is a relief to see that finally a few states have OK'd equal marriage at the ballot box, it would be better if we were facing this decision with a good quarter to a third of the states having stripped homophobia from their constitutions. It would be good if one of the states (like Oregon, for example) that have stained their constitutions with hate reversed that by the time of a SCOTUS ruling.

We got stuck with laws that criminalized sexual behavior between gay people that exempted the same behaviors with Bowers v. Hardwick in 1986, it took seventeen years for that to be reversed in Lawrence v. Texas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:08 PM

2. Yep, I agree 100%! Same thoughts here too. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:24 PM

3. I don't think it's premature.

DOMA has numerous circuit court decisions that need to be resolved. I don't think there was any more waiting to be done on the issue.

Prop 8 is more interesting, but the decision being appealed was specifically written for Justice Kennedy, who has a good record on LGBT issues. The question I keep asking is which four justices took the case? I don't think it was the conservatives, because they can't "trust" Kennedy on the issue. I think it was the liberals who feel confident they'll get Kennedy on their side.

And if Kennedy overturns Prop 8, I suspect Roberts will join the majority. He doesn't like 5-4 decisions, especially on the big issues. These are among the biggest issues the court has accepted in recent years, and even the conservatives know they're on the losing side of history. So my really early and totally wild-ass guess is Prop 8 will be overturned 6-3.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RudynJack (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 10, 2012, 07:17 AM

4. I worry about the particular cases being brought to the Court

In one, it's an overseas marriage where the deceased spouse's marriage was not recognized by the state of NY at the time of the death. We wouldn't expect the court system to recognize (for tax purposes) a polygamous marriage authorized by an Islamic country, would we? I feel that the case would be stronger with a marriage that was recognized by a US state, and conducted under its laws.

Also, with the California case, it would not apply universally to the rest of the US, and I'd like to see something come before the Court that would.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread