| Author | Time | Post | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| Cleita | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| jmowreader | Dec 2012 | #35 | |
| hack89 | Dec 2012 | #45 | |
| jmowreader | Dec 2012 | #57 | |
| Bok_Tukalo | Dec 2012 | #63 | |
| immoderate | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| ashling | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
| surrealAmerican | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
| Cleita | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
| surrealAmerican | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Dec 2012 | #75 | |
| unc70 | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
| progressoid | Dec 2012 | #36 | |
| cloudbase | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| aristocles | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| Smilo | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
| freshwest | Dec 2012 | #30 | |
| mike_c | Dec 2012 | #11 | |
| TheMadMonk | Dec 2012 | #64 | |
| mike_c | Dec 2012 | #66 | |
| madrchsod | Dec 2012 | #13 | |
| guardian | Dec 2012 | #14 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #16 | |
| mfcorey1 | Dec 2012 | #38 | |
| NYC_SKP | Dec 2012 | #18 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #19 | |
| Systematic Chaos | Dec 2012 | #29 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #39 | |
| MADem | Dec 2012 | #40 | |
| Kennah | Dec 2012 | #37 | |
| seabeyond | Dec 2012 | #42 | |
| Electric Monk | Dec 2012 | #46 | |
| seabeyond | Dec 2012 | #47 | |
| Electric Monk | Dec 2012 | #48 | |
| seabeyond | Dec 2012 | #49 | |
| Electric Monk | Dec 2012 | #51 | |
| seabeyond | Dec 2012 | #55 | |
| NCTraveler | Dec 2012 | #62 | |
| jmowreader | Dec 2012 | #58 | |
| Agschmid | Dec 2012 | #15 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #17 | |
| Agschmid | Dec 2012 | #21 | |
| 2on2u | Dec 2012 | #22 | |
| NYC_SKP | Dec 2012 | #23 | |
| Agschmid | Dec 2012 | #24 | |
| wtmusic | Dec 2012 | #33 | |
| trailmonkee | Dec 2012 | #44 | |
| Earth_First | Dec 2012 | #20 | |
| HiPointDem | Dec 2012 | #27 | |
| Scootaloo | Dec 2012 | #28 | |
| closeupready | Dec 2012 | #25 | |
| chalky | Dec 2012 | #34 | |
| Posteritatis | Dec 2012 | #69 | |
| liberal N proud | Dec 2012 | #26 | |
| Historic NY | Dec 2012 | #31 | |
| drm604 | Dec 2012 | #32 | |
| Posteritatis | Dec 2012 | #68 | |
| Tracer | Dec 2012 | #41 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Dec 2012 | #74 | |
| trailmonkee | Dec 2012 | #43 | |
| MadHound | Dec 2012 | #50 | |
| NoOneMan | Dec 2012 | #52 | |
| reformist2 | Dec 2012 | #53 | |
| SalviaBlue | Dec 2012 | #54 | |
| uponit7771 | Dec 2012 | #56 | |
| TeeYiYi | Dec 2012 | #59 | |
| Octafish | Dec 2012 | #60 | |
| TeeYiYi | Dec 2012 | #61 | |
| TheMadMonk | Dec 2012 | #65 | |
| curlyred | Dec 2012 | #67 | |
| greyl | Dec 2012 | #73 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Dec 2012 | #76 | |
| greyl | Dec 2012 | #78 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Dec 2012 | #80 | |
| delta17 | Dec 2012 | #70 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2012 | #71 | |
| delta17 | Dec 2012 | #72 | |
| jonthebru | Dec 2012 | #77 | |
| patrice | Dec 2012 | #79 |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:10 PM
Cleita (64,444 posts)
1. Why do they call it a printer?
|
A replicator ala Star Trek would be more like it IMHO.
Otherwise I find it fascinating. However, will end the need for factories and jobs as we know them? |
Response to Cleita (Reply #1)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:13 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
2. Because it lays down polymers and resin (don't quote me on the polymer) a thin layer at a
|
time.... it actually prints it out.
Your other question.... the factory of the future will have two employees. A man and a dog. The man will be there to watch the switch. The dog will be there to make sure he doesn't touch it. |
Response to 2on2u (Reply #2)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:16 PM
jmowreader (23,897 posts)
35. Not true
|
What's it take to print, say, a wrench? Even assuming we will ever be able to print with metal strong enough for wrenches, it'll take a while.
A conventional forging machine will make hundreds of wrenches in the time it takes to print one. This technology would end the need to stock millions of parts for cars they don't make anymore; just print a new camshaft for your Corvair instead of stocking a shelf in a warehouse with them. If you need thousands or millions of something, current production methods are better. |
Response to jmowreader (Reply #35)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 11:26 AM
hack89 (21,217 posts)
45. But if you had one in your garage?
|
think about the possibilities - just down load a plan from the internet and you can make an endlessly variety of objects. Many won't care to buy such a device but many DIYrs and backyard mechanics would.
|
Response to hack89 (Reply #45)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:15 PM
jmowreader (23,897 posts)
57. If I had one of those, I'd already have a wrench
|
I would like to have one. I would use it in a confectionery business.
Imagine you're getting married and your bride-to-be wants a special, personalized souvenir for her shower. I know...how about chocolate bars with the wedding couple's names on them? She would come to me, I would design her bar, she'd sign off on it and I would make them. But here's the thing: I would never attempt to print fifty candy bars in chocolate, even though I could. I would print three in plastic, vacuform them in acetyl plastic sheet, and pour tempered chocolate into them. The same process would work for bars sold at high school games...imagine how many Timberwolf Bars or Viking Bars the local high schools could sell. I've heard all this before with other things new and technological...oh, online shopping will kill stores. In the end, technology does what it does best and traditional ways do what they do best. The average person wouldn't buy one of these machines. Everything he needs is available commercially. A lot of people who bought one would use it until the novelty wore off. Look in the classifieds of your local paper and you'll find plenty of "used once" items - things people bought because they were going to be so cool, then sold once the cool wore off. The great mass of people are not going to buy an expensive tool to make their own 2010 Dodge Dakota PCV valves when it's quicker and cheaper to buy them at AutoZone. This is a tool for a limited subset of the population. The first home users that will buy them are guys who have lathes and table saws. They made all the cabinets in their kitchens. They made the salad bowls. They learned metal spinning and made the skillets. Now they can make their own flatware? Yeah buddy, sign them up! The Jay Lenos among us will be the other home users. They buy cars whose manufacturers went out of the car business 71 years ago today. There are cars from the fifties that won't run for lack of parts. If the Sunbeam Club or the Bricklin Club had downloadable part files, you could make your own carb floats. And in industry, prototypes and tooling are natural uses. But building a factory to print over hours what a hydraulic press can make in seconds? Not likely. |
Response to jmowreader (Reply #57)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:59 PM
Bok_Tukalo (3,861 posts)
63. My Ebay bill for Sunbeam parts alone would pay for it
|
<OPE>
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #1)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:19 PM
immoderate (16,449 posts)
3. It doesn't "replicate." It makes a 3-D picture, in a proprietary medium.
|
Pretty Cool.
--imm |
Response to Cleita (Reply #1)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:27 PM
ashling (19,168 posts)
6. They call it a printer because
|
it is theirs and they can call it any damned thing they want to
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #1)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:45 PM
surrealAmerican (7,466 posts)
8. It not nearly as cool as a replicator.
|
It just makes plastic take on different shapes.
|
Response to surrealAmerican (Reply #8)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:48 PM
Cleita (64,444 posts)
9. Depending on what they are printing, I assume you could change the composition of
|
the "ink" to be closer to what you want to make to be like the original. Isn't the principle behind the Star Trek replicator that it rearranged the atoms of the waste and trash on the ship?
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #9)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:08 PM
surrealAmerican (7,466 posts)
10. The technology here is nowhere near that point.
|
We're talking about fusing plastic, not rearranging atoms.
|
Response to surrealAmerican (Reply #10)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:33 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (8,607 posts)
75. Baby steps. Baby steps.
|
Look at human organ printers or skin printers.
|
Response to surrealAmerican (Reply #8)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:18 PM
unc70 (2,317 posts)
12. Not just plastics
|
Metals, structural elements, experimental organs, faux "meat", lots of strange things in tests.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #1)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 12:01 AM
progressoid (27,266 posts)
36. It can't be a replicator until it can make a cup of tea, Earl Grey, hot.
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:20 PM
cloudbase (3,063 posts)
4. He's got to feed the dog as well. n/t
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:26 PM
aristocles (275 posts)
5. The business opportunity here is HUGE!
|
Last edited Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) This will help drive the renaissance of manufacturing in the US over the coming decade.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 07:42 PM
Smilo (1,885 posts)
7. Awesome
|
Great job guys.
The possibilities are endless. |
Response to Smilo (Reply #7)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:36 PM
freshwest (31,239 posts)
30. +1,000. Just blew me away here. This is great.
|
Last edited Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:36 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:45 PM
mike_c (31,504 posts)
11. what's really crazy is that our dept core facility manager printed one yesterday...
|
Last edited Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ...as the calibration object for our new 3D printer. Not that big though-- his looked like a six inch wrench. But the crazy thing is that it prints in one piece, with the threads, the knurled adjustment screw, and the rack on the sliding mechanism all pre-assembled in position, with the space filled by a different plastic that dissolves out during a sodium hydroxide soak. The adjustment screw was just beginning to turn when he showed it to me. Way cool.
|
Response to mike_c (Reply #11)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:22 PM
TheMadMonk (5,779 posts)
64. How much "slop" is there in the original? Unhardened powder...
|
...is left in the gaps. blows out or works out with movement.
|
Response to TheMadMonk (Reply #64)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 10:12 PM
mike_c (31,504 posts)
66. I don't know....
|
It used a stabilization material between working parts that needed to be removed by soaking in hot sodium hydroxide (not a very strong soln though, apparently). It was just beginning to loosen up when he showed it to me. The adjustable parts were not actually moving yet, just beginning to wiggle a little.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:23 PM
madrchsod (55,705 posts)
13. i want one for christmas!
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:31 PM
guardian (2,282 posts)
14. Let me know when you can print
|
one of these!
![]() |
Response to guardian (Reply #14)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:35 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
16. I don't know if the print heads can handle silicone.... we'll just have to wait and
|
see.....
|
Response to guardian (Reply #14)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:38 PM
NYC_SKP (48,725 posts)
18. Your post has been alerted upon because somebody thinks, apparently, that it's a violation.
|
I dare them to post a reply explaining their alert.
I voted to leave it alone. And here's a beefcake:\\
Now, back to work! |
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #18)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:40 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
19. But of course it's a violation, what else could it be? Damn killjoys. n/t
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #18)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:25 PM
Systematic Chaos (8,076 posts)
29. But..but...don't you understand?? PRINTING TEH CHIKZ R SEXXIST! AND STUFFS!!one!1!!
|
Oh, and printing teh doodz mite maek u catch teh ghey.
|
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #18)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:23 AM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
39. Ooops..... lost in the thread, I thought the OP was alerted..... didn't make sense at the time
|
but still I jumped right in..... bad brain cells.
|
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #18)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 09:17 AM
MADem (85,867 posts)
40. That old man is a "beefcake?"
|
Who knew?
I remember, years ago, he had a shitfit when he got hit by a flying goose on a roller coaster! I'm no expert on beefcake, but I suspect that guy would only be a draw to the "Romance Novel Cover" crowd from about twenty or more years ago! |
Response to guardian (Reply #14)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 02:38 AM
Kennah (6,738 posts)
37. In the words of Ron White ...
|
... if I printed out one of those, and the media found out about it, they'd say I'd been fucking it. And, they'd be right.
|
Response to seabeyond (Reply #42)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 02:49 PM
Electric Monk (7,677 posts)
46. The subject of this thread is 3D printers. Would you call the output of a 3D printer "her"?
|
counter-point
|
Response to Electric Monk (Reply #46)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 02:54 PM
seabeyond (85,892 posts)
47. would you fuck an "output"? nt
Response to seabeyond (Reply #47)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:38 PM
Electric Monk (7,677 posts)
48. I didn't write post #37, but sex toys are quite common, and used by both sexes. nt
|
|
Response to Electric Monk (Reply #48)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:44 PM
seabeyond (85,892 posts)
49. you get minus "point" for that one.
|
|
Response to seabeyond (Reply #49)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:50 PM
Electric Monk (7,677 posts)
51. I don't know what you're yammering about, but feel free to be offended. You always are. nt
|
|
Response to Electric Monk (Reply #51)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:59 PM
seabeyond (85,892 posts)
55. ah. well, i thought we were beyond knowing, shit, and i was teasing
|
hence the wink and joke about a minus "point". but, good projection....
|
Response to seabeyond (Reply #47)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:36 PM
NCTraveler (1,714 posts)
62. Many men and women "fuck" the "output" of a manufacturing device. nt.
Response to guardian (Reply #14)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:24 PM
jmowreader (23,897 posts)
58. It would be just my luck...
|
...that I'd spend five million to buy a printer big enough to print a live woman, and the first seven or eight wouldn't like me after they were done.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:35 PM
Agschmid (1,863 posts)
15. Hot dang.
|
This is just getting more and more amazing everyday!
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #15)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:36 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
17. The gears.... the freaking gears work, it just this side of magic. n/t
Response to 2on2u (Reply #17)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:46 PM
Agschmid (1,863 posts)
21. Someone above
|
posted that they print the space between the gears with a material that degrades which then allows the movement, that is the crazy part! I need to read more about that.
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #21)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:49 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
22. Saw that, it gets washed out by some medium, forgot what it was but when I mention this to
|
people at work they look at me and say, you'll believe anything you see on the internet, and they mean it.... it's hard to get some people to come up to speed without them actually holding, touching and operating stuff that defies what would be considered normal I guess.
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #21)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:59 PM
NYC_SKP (48,725 posts)
23. I have a 3D printer at school, allow me to explain:
|
I also have a couple of small crescent wrenches we printed, they don't work as well as the real thing but are nonetheless amazing.
There are technologies for metal printing, a form of sintering, that costs more than the ABS plastic printers that run from $1,500 to $30,000 and more. The support material is different from the printing material, and after the entire wrench is printed, you need to take the whole mess, the final parts and support material, and soak it in a hot bath of lye, often attached to the printing unit. It usually takes overnight to dissolve the support material and sometimes you have to use dental tools to pull the stuff out of cavities, but it does eventually go away. A better form of printing is stereolithography, I hope to get an SL printer soon. No support material involved. Here's something I've printed: https:// |
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #23)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:05 PM
Agschmid (1,863 posts)
24. Thanks for the explanation!
|
The geared heart is pretty amazing too. I am going to have to get to a trade show soon so I can see these in action.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:43 PM
Earth_First (11,576 posts)
20. One would think that with the 'doubling effect' of technology in the next 50 years
|
that things such as poverty, homelessness and starvation would be a thing of the past.
Looking at things like this makes me wildly hopeful. |
Response to Earth_First (Reply #20)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:10 PM
HiPointDem (16,776 posts)
27. One would have thought that a hundred years ago too. In fact, a lot of people did. But the
|
poverty rate doesn't really have a lot to do with how technologically advanced civilizations are.
There's a good argument to be made that technological advancement 'invented' poverty, actually. |
Response to Earth_First (Reply #20)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:17 PM
Scootaloo (5,830 posts)
28. Only if it's distributed properly
|
Which sadly, isn't all that likely
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:05 PM
closeupready (19,432 posts)
25. I'd like to know the carbon footprint of a process like this,
|
the energy needed.
but yes, it's fascinating. |
Response to closeupready (Reply #25)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:03 PM
chalky (3,257 posts)
34. I was wondering if the printed items were recyclable.
|
The video kept mentioning taking a printer into space and printing tools as needed. But what about when they're no longer needed? Would you be able to recycle the tools, or would you end up trapped in a space station, buried in the clutter you've printed in the past?
|
Response to chalky (Reply #34)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:02 AM
Posteritatis (17,250 posts)
69. Different printers use different media, so it'd depend on that
|
I read about one that could work with cheese, though I wouldn't want to clean the thing.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:09 PM
liberal N proud (43,652 posts)
26. 3D printers are amazing
|
I saw an airplane engine that was printed, the prop even rotated.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:47 PM
Historic NY (19,704 posts)
31. I belong to a Revolutionary War group, one of those would make ..
|
extending the original moulds we use possible. They are so old the hand work involved to clean up the casting is crazy. Just for making repairs.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:53 PM
drm604 (13,961 posts)
32. Will we eventually have a DMPA to complement the DMCA?
|
I use DMPA to stand for Digital Millennium Patent Act. Patent holders will be desperate to stop individuals from illegally copying their patented objects. I can imagine patent violating scan files being distributed illegally by torrent.
|
Response to drm604 (Reply #32)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:00 AM
Posteritatis (17,250 posts)
68. I expect these to get pretty brutally regulated
|
I'd be only slightly surprised if there was some kneejerk attempt at an outright ban or mandatory licensing, especially after the first time someone does something particularly stupid with one and the news gets a hold of it.
Of course, at the same time, rolling your own designs is pretty easy for the existing ones, especially if they can already read numerous existing 3D/CAD formats. I imagine there's going to be quite a few companies thinking they can get into business selling schematics for one simple thing or another who will get completely bypassed by what's already publicly available in that department. |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 09:57 AM
Tracer (1,909 posts)
41. The guy explaining the process ...
|
... was the homeowner of last year's This Old House remodel.
He had designed and printed out a completed model of his antique house and the addition that was to be built. The house model was incredibly detailed, and I was boggled to learn of this "printing" process. |
Response to Tracer (Reply #41)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:26 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (8,607 posts)
74. I too was boggled when I first saw the episode.
|
I sat everyone I know down and made them watch it.
Here it is. It's a little better explanation of the process: HBS, 30 year fan of This Old House |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 11:12 AM
trailmonkee (2,595 posts)
43. But can the 3D Printer, Print a 3D Printer?
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:47 PM
MadHound (34,179 posts)
50. Oh boy, another energy hogging, pollution spewing way to make plastic crap.
|
Really now, plastic wrenches, how long are those going to last? But hey, they're cheap to make and as the price of these things goes down, more and more people will use them.
Meanwhile by doing so we will continue to burn more and more energy, and cause more and more pollution. Just go out and buy a good set of metal wrenches, they'll last your lifetime or more. |
Response to MadHound (Reply #50)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:51 PM
NoOneMan (1,655 posts)
52. Its appalling that as the earth dies, we get hard-ons for machines that hurry the process
|
This thread looks like an iPhone X announcement.
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:55 PM
reformist2 (4,050 posts)
53. It might be the "next big thing," but most people will just end up having lots more plastic junk.
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:57 PM
SalviaBlue (1,874 posts)
54. Incredible!
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:59 PM
uponit7771 (16,130 posts)
56. ******3D Metal Printer******* will print metal instal of resin plastic. This is new ish
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:30 PM
TeeYiYi (4,603 posts)
59. It won't be long before we'll all have one. Remember these?...
|
First personal calculator:
First portable computer:
First portable cell phone:
I remember them. Prohibitively pricy albatrosses, all. Now I have numerous old (not that old) calculators, cell phones and desktop/laptop computers strewn between old boxes in my garage. I use a smartphone that can perform the functions of all three...and then some. By a mile. TYY |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:30 PM
Octafish (33,393 posts)
60. ''I can keep the tool?''
|
Incredible!
Thank you, 2on2u! |
Response to Octafish (Reply #60)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:36 PM
TeeYiYi (4,603 posts)
61. "I can haz tool?" lulz ...nt
|
TYY
|
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 07:16 PM
TheMadMonk (5,779 posts)
65. And a thought. A foundry with one of these, could make...
|
Dies on Monday.
Sand moulds Tuesday. Pour on Wedneday. Break out and clean up on Thursday. Deliver on Friday. Any part ever cast in metal can be cast again. Cheaply enough to make it worthwhile. |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 11:56 PM
curlyred (1,667 posts)
67. We had one of these in for a demo
|
At work. I have to say they are pretty sweet. Expensive and slow as hell. But amazing. Printed out a working salt shaker.
|
Response to curlyred (Reply #67)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:25 AM
greyl (16,442 posts)
73. Ones that print with ABS plastic aren't that expensive, I don't think
Response to greyl (Reply #73)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:50 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (8,607 posts)
76. When I first saw this on This Old House (post #74) I thought how cool it would be...
|
... to be able to print a full size home.
Maybe one day a truck will pull up to the job site and print entire sections of a home or components. Or custom furniture? Maybe all that plastic furniture on the show Space 1999 was printed. |
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #76)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:54 AM
greyl (16,442 posts)
78. Entire rows of homes could be built this way.
|
Last edited Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:56 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Huge versions with many different "print heads", moving on rails.
(saw it on some PBS show several months ago) edit: this one, I think: http://video.pbs.org/video/2303503361 |
Response to greyl (Reply #78)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:05 AM
Hassin Bin Sober (8,607 posts)
80. Fuckers stole another one of my ideas!
|
Btw, I invented the EZ pass too!!! |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:08 AM
delta17 (3 posts)
70. Pretty cool
|
Lurker here. This is really cool, but I don't know how that wrench would hold up in actual field use. I have a breaker bar that I use to break torque on rusted/painted on bolts that my impact won't. It was around $15 and it does a great job. I just don't see actual metal tools being replaced by printed ones.
|
Response to delta17 (Reply #70)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:13 AM
hrmjustin (8,815 posts)
71. Welcome to DU and I hope you enjoy the site.
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:54 AM
jonthebru (956 posts)
77. How about,
|
if you had some old gadget with a few broken or worn parts. With this device you could repair said gadget by "printing" a new part.
Granted, you would need the old part and may need to fix it on screen after scanning it, but the idea is really exciting. There are things it could not do, like springs or weighty items, but if for example you could infuse electrical paths, wiring so to speak through the part, you could invent new ways of doing manufacturing. This is only the beginning. I have seen a few videos on these printers, this one is the best cause it shows more of how it actually works. Its a crazy world. |
Response to 2on2u (Original post)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:05 AM
patrice (47,255 posts)
79. Wow! I've heard of these printers, but couldn't imagine what they were talking about.
|
Thanks for posting, 2on2u!
Fascinating. |


