Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:06 PM
Happyhippychick (5,697 posts)
Anyone see Chris Matthews segment on Hilary "definitely" running?
I'm feeling a tingle up my leg!
|
12 replies, 801 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Happyhippychick | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| DrToast | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| democrattotheend | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| AldoLeopold | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| MrSlayer | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| madrchsod | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
| BeyondGeography | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
| northoftheborder | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
| OldDem2012 | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
| FarCenter | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
| Pirate Smile | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
| madrchsod | Dec 2012 | #11 |
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:06 PM
DrToast (3,967 posts)
1. Didn't see it, but I agree.
|
That sort of ambition doesn't go away. She'll run again.
|
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:08 PM
hrmjustin (9,301 posts)
2. I saw it.
|
I hope she runs.
|
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:09 PM
democrattotheend (7,442 posts)
3. Why is he talking about 2016?
|
I can't stand when the media fixates on 2016, which is of absolutely no relevance right now. President Obama just got re-elected. He hasn't even been sworn in for his second term yet. Can't they give him a little time to govern before they obsess about who is going to replace him more than 4 years from now?
|
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:13 PM
AldoLeopold (600 posts)
4. I'll vote for her
|
but she'll be 69 years old if my math is correct. Something to consider. Might not matter though. It's not like we haven't had presidents that age before.
|
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:16 PM
MrSlayer (21,367 posts)
5. It was based on a recent New Yorker article.
|
It's not like he just brought it up out of the blue to be provocative. I do agree that she's running though. She would be one of the most qualified people to ever seek the office.
|
Response to MrSlayer (Reply #5)
madrchsod This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:19 PM
BeyondGeography (21,326 posts)
6. I like her chances
|
Age is a laughable non-issue. Reagan was the same age and that was 32 years ago.
|
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:34 PM
northoftheborder (3,443 posts)
7. Didn't see it, what did he say?
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:44 PM
OldDem2012 (3,526 posts)
8. Way too early for that kind of speculation ....
|
...let's give her a chance to recover from the last four years and see what she wants to do then.
Tweety's full of crap, as usual. |
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:53 PM
FarCenter (13,085 posts)
9. A tinkle up your leg?
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:59 PM
Pirate Smile (27,530 posts)
10. I saw it. If Ed Rendell is going to dredge up stuff from 2008 then Hillary should tell him to not
|
go on shows.
I think most 08 Obama primary/caucus voters think Hillary & Bill have been great & are quite ready to jump on the bandwagon to break the glass ceiling. I swear Rendell wanted to divide a united party with that one stupid comment. Geez. The definition of "not helping". |
Response to Happyhippychick (Original post)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 08:18 PM
madrchsod (55,748 posts)
11. i would`t vote for her in a primary
|
there is no dam reason anyone my age should be president of the united states for 4 yr let alone 8 yrs. it`s a very stressful job for someone obama`s age and let`s face it people hillary and my age really ain`t up to that kind of pressure. let`s find someone who is young enough so they can retire and enjoy the rest of their life.
|

