HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Fracking Secrets by Thous...

Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:56 PM

Fracking Secrets by Thousands Keep U.S. Clueless on Wells

Fracking Secrets by Thousands Keep U.S. Clueless on Wells

A subsidiary of Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) pumped a mixture of chemicals identified only as “EXP- F0173-11” into a half-dozen oil wells in rural Karnes County, Texas, in July.

Few people outside Nabors, the largest onshore drilling contractor by revenue, know exactly what’s in that blend. This much is clear: One ingredient, an unidentified solvent, can cause damage to the kidney and liver, according to safety information about the product that Michigan state regulators have on file.

A year-old Texas law that requires drillers to disclose chemicals they pump underground during hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” was powerless to compel transparency for EXP- F0173-11. The solvent and several other ingredients in the product are considered a trade secret by Superior Well Services, the Nabors subsidiary. That means they’re exempt from disclosure.

Drilling companies in Texas, the biggest oil-and-natural gas producing state, claimed similar exemptions about 19,000 times this year through August, according to their chemical- disclosure reports. Data from the documents were compiled by Pivot Upstream Group, a Houston-based firm that studies the energy industry, and analyzed by Bloomberg News. Nationwide, companies withheld one out of every five chemicals they used in fracking, a separate examination of a broader database shows.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-30/frack-secrets-by-thousands-keep-u-s-clueless-on-wells.html

1 replies, 375 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fracking Secrets by Thousands Keep U.S. Clueless on Wells (Original post)
The Straight Story Dec 2012 OP
Hydra Dec 2012 #1

Response to The Straight Story (Original post)

Mon Dec 3, 2012, 04:18 PM

1. This is a good example of why information can't and shouldn't be "proprietary"

The idea that information can be solely owned by someone is ludicrous enough by itself, but here we can see how people can just hide what they're doing.

Build an OS that spies on people? Proprietary. Make a food product that causes cancer long term? Proprietary. Diebold? Proprietary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread