General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen talking to members of the military and retired veterans
I am talking about the right-wing ones which include family members.
Inevitably when the conversation comes to "Obamacare" or "free stuff and things" I call them out on the benefits they get which are 100% paid for by the US Government.
Where I get stumped is when they counter with the "I earned it because I was willing to lay my life on the line" speech.
I respect the fact that they were willing to do that but I cannot stand it when thy use it as cover while bashing the very "government" (as it applies to others) they rely so heavily on.
How do you handle this?
How would you reply?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)The problem with the RWers is that their attitude is "I got mine Jack, screw you"
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)with VA health insurance & a pension and comes out with that crap all the time. Kinda pisses me off because he was never in combat or even close to it.
The contrast between us is interesting in that I'm a Vietnam combat vet with 3 bullet holes who came back radicalized, joined the antiwar movement, campaigned hard for McGovern & have been moving progressively leftward ever since.
Bigmack
(8,020 posts).. always pull that "life on the line" bullshit?
The guys on the barstools at the VFW and such will be glad to tell you about their hardships, like the time they got that nasty paper cut, and the time the freezer broke and they lost all the ice cream.
I just tell people who pull that shit that I got enough time in the shit that I can tell them they're suckers for not seeing they were used by the people they are defending.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)My dad will occasionally trot out his heroism for serving in an argument with me to explain why he deserves the benefits he gets while others don't and get super pissed off when I point out the only country he's ever been to was Australia. Wrecking your car on a kangaroo doesn't make you a war hero.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)in memory of the kangaroo?
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)That would've been awesome, though.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)It's definitely not just an American thing; the younger soldiers and ex-soldiers in my neck of the woods I've noticed who throw cliches like that around tend to have had sedate careers in the military to say the least, and the older ones have a tendency to have been off in the rear themselves (at least, the ones old enough to have served in wars that had "the rear" .
The ones who actually had to do things that resulted in loud noises and property damage usually seem to be just a bit more humble and less hyperbolic about the whole thing, and seem to be way less likely to cast every deployment as a Holy Crusade For Canadian Civil Rights Except The Ones I Don't Want People To Have.
(Then there's people who are just pretending to have served, of course, who tend to be even viler than the puffed-up actual vets, but that's a whole different rant.)
rppper
(2,952 posts)....served in the rear.....I don't consider driving 4 submarines, including one with 16 ballistic missiles, a rear echelon job....and just for clarification, even marine band members have to be rifle qualified....the cooks on Guadalcanal had to fight alongside the infantry too....the last person I had to explain this too was out local RW radio host, who argued supply, personnel men, band members and cooks didn't deserve pensions....
I'm not trying to argue a point here, I just don't appreciate the broad brushing...supply personnel play key roles...they keep the troops fed, armed, fueled and keep morale as high as possible...
Bigmack
(8,020 posts).. are nicknames for anybody who had it easier - or perceived as easier - than whoever is speaking.
Line grunts are "pogues" to Recon Marines or Special Forces.
And those guys are "pogues" to Scout Snipers.
They're all - more or less - terms of endearment.... sort of. And perhaps a little envy.
Same as "squids, rust pickers, junior birdmen, dogfaces, puddle pirates (Coast Guard), bullet sponge(infantry), meat bomb (paratroopers), bubbleheads (submariners), REMFs, RAMFs... and now Fobbits...
rppper
(2,952 posts)....and I'm just sharing an experience...
Lol...honestly if you have a non technical or non nuclear job....aka supply, cooks, personnel staff....on a sub you are the guy they train to go into a flooded or burning compartment and save the nuke guys...a chief corpsman onboard my 3rd boat explained they do this because "they spend millions training the nukes, tens of thousands to train me, and about a $1.57 training you....."
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...and a freshman in college. Nobody knows i'm a veteran because I dont have anything on my car or body that is from the military. I have noticed that some fellow vets like to try to shut down argument by saying the whole I served yadda yadda fought for freedom life in danger stuff and they try it on me and shut up really quick when I tell them I am also a vet, and did not have an office job. I dont like doing that but I am dissapointed by some of my fellow vets and their actions.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)military and he wasn't a slacker either. If he requested on several ocassions to go to a TO&E unit but they never sent him. When the troops went to Dessert Storm the first time my husband wanted to go but they kept him back. While the guys were over there getting fat because there was a pretty short war. He was back as the senior NCO having to put up with their crying wives and problems that some of the troops didn't take care of with their children. He and many of the troops that stayed behind made sure that they got the supplies they needed and when they got back many came back fat because they had nothing to do. Some of them got awards while the people who were back here working hard to trying to make everyone happy got not even a thank you. My husband didn't ask any soldier to do something that he wouldn't do. He got both his Jump wings and AirAssault wings late in his career all because he wanted to prove to himself he could do it. My hubby isn't a heavy guy and he was a chaplain's assistant but he was a strong supporter of troops. It wasn't his fault he didn't get to go but he asked twice but the boss wouldn't let him go. Because of that he didn't get the next stripe so he decided to get out in 95. Please don't think because someone is in the back isn't doing anything to support the men and women in the front lines because that isn't true at all. By the way both father and father-in-law both served over 21 yrs a piece and I would never hear something like this about someone being assigned to what unit. You do your job and go where they tell you to go.
By the way when a lifer says something like that I give it right back and tell them yes you earned your pension and so do the people who work in jobs and retire and expect to get their retirement and benefits they paid into just like you and me. Face it buddy your a socialist wheter you like it or not.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... and taxes I paid my entire life pay for Medicare AND the benefits you and all veterans receive.
Cirque du So-What
(25,928 posts)They justify it as 'defending the Constitution against enemies - foreign & domestic.' When I point out that they were obliged to obey the lawful orders of the CinC, they usually reply with something along the lines of 'well, he's not *my* CinC, because I'm not on active duty.' I have met with minimal success with veterans - even though I am one myself.
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)Getting the Obama hate out of the tactical levels of the military is a near impossible task.
At this point I just steer conversations away from the public eye and let them gripe internally.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...on the common area TV's in the military bases I wonder?
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)HLN in some, CNN in others and Fox in the rest...
Usually most places I see are ESPN...
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)that religion teaching and when they go into the regular service they bring that with them.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)I told my son-in-law (18 years Navy) that I do not begrudge his healthcare and that I only wish I had access to such coverage after a lifetime of working (before 65).
That stumped him a bit.
-
If you believe that military service gives you exclusive access to the fruits of democracy then you don't really believe in what it is you thought you were fighting for. People serve their country in many different ways.
or more harshly... There is no honor in accepting what you deny others.
btw, I strongly support the expansion of veteran benefits across the board... even as I abhor militarism.
Cheers,
Agony
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...it was their choice to join the military in the first place. Nobody forced them to join, and for those still in the military, nobody is forcing them to stay. The vast majority of folks who stay in the military until retirement do so because they know there is no equivalent job on the outside that will provide the level of benefits they receive in the military. Ask the folks still in the military why they haven't gotten out. Listen carefully to the answers they give you. Ask them who they believe pays for those benefits.
Ask the folks who retired from the military why they stayed in the military...wasn't it for the retirement pay and medical benefits they received when they got out, and still receive? What they get in retirement is no different philosophically than what civilians receive when they retire and start collecting Social Security and Medicare.
The tax dollars WE ALL PAY INTO THE SYSTEM pays for "Obamacare" and the other "free stuff" the US Government provides as benefits. Therefore, none of what the Government provides is free. We all pay some sort of price for the benefits we receive.
Lots of folks who currently receive one or more Government benefits like food stamps, unemployment, etc., are ALSO veterans who didn't stay in the military until retirement. In addition to paying for them with their tax dollars, don't those veterans also earn those benefits by virtue of having served their country at some point in their lives?
Unfortunately, logic fails when dealing with some people. Good luck.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)not their rights.
I've paid taxes all my life for the benefits we all receive. We've ALL done something to earn our entitlements. That's why their called entitlements, we're entitled to them.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)VA is a product of WWIi. Some facts usually piss them off.
And it was passed by democrats with clear opposition of the GOP. I add, they think people on government programrs are mooches, so they are.
Yup, they get pissed...but that is the reality.
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Fighting is not the most important contribution anyone can make to their country.
That doesn't diminish how vital or difficult it can be, but we have to start speaking meaningfully about the many fights and sacrifices people make that don't involve warfare.
Chris Hayes tried to get at this on Veterans' Day, and was met with the usual hail of outrage whenever it's suggested we venerate war too much.
But we do. And we do it in a crass, meaningless way that doesn't necessarily honor any real value. Look at Republicans, constantly mouthing respect for the military with all the ritualistic words about heroes and sacrifice, while sending people to die in unheroic missions, to sacrifice everything for causes that are questionable at best, then chopping their benefits and handing out no-bid contracts so their cronies can get fat on the bloodletting.
It's not that our fighting people deserve any less honor or respect or commitment. It's that others deserve the same.
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)Response to SHRED (Original post)
AnotherMcIntosh This message was self-deleted by its author.
Separation
(1,975 posts)Tricare isn't free, an it's far from "great" healthcare. Don't even get me started on the dental.
DaniDubois
(154 posts)Not for my safety. Nothing about any of these wars have made America a safer place.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)That's the standard right wing claim.
Free Market Competition leads to better healthcare.
And so, by accepting government provided healthcare, they are either (a) accepting lower grade healthcare than they could get in the competitive free market, or (b) proving that government based care is in fact, better health care (which apparently, only they deserve).