Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:11 PM
Renew Deal (56,907 posts)
What is the republicans role in Benghazi?
There's something about the Benghazi mess that is clear to me. Republicans are trying to make a scandal out of a terrorist attack. But what if it wasn't just a terrorist attack? Why have the Republicans been having fits over it? Republicans doth protest too much. This is a big red flag. Is there something they don't want us to know?
I always thought the way Benghazi worked out and the timing was suspicious. Romney seemed a little too confident about victory, particularly over the summer. Benghazi happened before Romney received security briefings. Romney's response was over the top. Then the republicans started hearings before the election with the expectation they would find something. After that, Romney took shots at Obama about Benghazi during the debate and got crushed. But again, he behaved like he knew something. I think the republicans are creating a smokescreen to cover their own role in the Benghazi mess.
|
11 replies, 653 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Renew Deal | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| still_one | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| Agschmid | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| still_one | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| Renew Deal | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| still_one | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| Mnemosyne | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| Renew Deal | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| Historic NY | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| TwilightGardener | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| Renew Deal | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| Tx4obama | Nov 2012 | #11 |
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:15 PM
still_one (31,073 posts)
1. They refused to approve an increase in embassy protection. The only other point I can think is that
|
Last edited Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Republicans were actually involved in attacking the embassy
|
Response to still_one (Reply #1)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:16 PM
Agschmid (1,863 posts)
2. I'll go with the first one... the second is just treasonous. n/t
Response to Agschmid (Reply #2)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:19 PM
still_one (31,073 posts)
3. I wasn't actually serious about the second,, however, outing CIA agents is also treasonous
Response to still_one (Reply #1)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:22 PM
Renew Deal (56,907 posts)
5. What do you mean by "attracting the embassy?"
|
I don't get it.
|
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #5)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:30 PM
still_one (31,073 posts)
7. Stupid iPad auto corrects, attack
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:21 PM
Mnemosyne (16,151 posts)
4. I wonder if they were trying to set up impeachment. nt
Response to Mnemosyne (Reply #4)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:23 PM
Renew Deal (56,907 posts)
6. It probably had more to do with the election
|
But now they want to waste Obama's time like they did for Clinton with Whitewater, etc.
|
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:35 PM
Historic NY (19,704 posts)
8. Playing games....
|
The consulate office was placed right in the middle of a CIA operations to provided cover. They know but they are like yipping dogs.
|
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:40 PM
TwilightGardener (39,679 posts)
9. It's very suspicious. They're not really getting to the bottom
|
of it, either--the GOP is focused on what was said AFTER the fact.
|
Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #9)
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 11:46 PM
Renew Deal (56,907 posts)
10. That's a good point
|
For all of Rohrbachers talk about "four dead americans" he and the republicans are focused on what was said after the fact.
|
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 03:40 AM
Tx4obama (28,751 posts)

