HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » SS: Clark . . . . SecDef:...

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:48 AM

SS: Clark . . . . SecDef: Flournoy

Problems solved.

Two VERY competent people.

Kerry stays in his senate seat.

McCain blows out like a cat 1 hurricane that never makes landfall, sinking unceremoniously in the north Atlantic.

5 replies, 610 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply SS: Clark . . . . SecDef: Flournoy (Original post)
Stinky The Clown Nov 2012 OP
NYC_SKP Nov 2012 #1
ananda Nov 2012 #2
lalalu Nov 2012 #4
graham4anything Nov 2012 #3
Renew Deal Nov 2012 #5

Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:51 AM

1. No. We want SS Rice. NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:51 AM

2. I say Secretary Susan Rice ..

.. just to blow Reep sexism and bigotry back in their faces..
and to show that Dems do not back down when we're in the right
AND the majority.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ananda (Reply #2)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:56 AM

4. I also just think she is the right person for

 

the job. The response to her nomination is ridiculous. I think Kerry would make a good secretary of defense as long as his senate seat remains safe. He has been right on many issues and has real military experience. He could also bore some of our enemies to death

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:52 AM

3. It's sure to be Rice. 100% certain unless she actually doesn't want it.

 

Eric HOlder for SCOTUS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:56 AM

5. Why do we want generals as diplomats?

I don't really understand this. We have generals in the military. We have generals at the CIA. Now we want more generals in the State Dept? And what does it say to the world when our top diplomat is a war maker?

I like Clark, but not for Secretary of State.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread