Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Hobbit (Original Post) brettdale Nov 2012 OP
I will see all three movies eShirl Nov 2012 #1
Movies? Plural? Do I understand correctly that he's cut The Hobbit up into three Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #6
Yes, it includes Gandalf's journey to the tower and Moria Recursion Dec 2012 #20
You mean go see RudynJack Nov 2012 #2
As long as Jackson keeps turning the studio's money into more money, eShirl Nov 2012 #3
Ah, ok RudynJack Nov 2012 #4
No. eShirl Dec 2012 #21
how necessary they are depends on how good/bad the movies will be JI7 Nov 2012 #8
You really don't RudynJack Dec 2012 #9
clips show Galadriel who wasn't in the Hobbit JI7 Dec 2012 #13
Spoilers (if that's neccessary) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #17
No. Peter Jackson did an outstanding job with LOTR Hekate Dec 2012 #15
I felt taken advantage of by Rankin/Bass's The Hobbit eShirl Dec 2012 #22
Yeah, he's milking it alright. WCLinolVir Dec 2012 #26
No tama Dec 2012 #27
Not at all- In fact I am happy they are doing it Marrah_G Dec 2012 #40
The 3 LOTR movies were one hell of a fucking rush and EXCELLENTLY executed. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #5
Of the original Tolkein books, The Hobbit was always my favorite. Electric Monk Nov 2012 #7
I'd only be interested for the Star Trek preview. And that's only in IMAX, LeftyMom Dec 2012 #10
The exact moment I clicked on this thread... GReedDiamond Dec 2012 #11
I kind of wish they hadn't made the Dwarves look so goofy, but... Marr Dec 2012 #12
I love what they've done to give the dwarves some individuality. Aristus Dec 2012 #42
All 3 LOTR movies were superb. If The Hobbit is as good... Hekate Dec 2012 #14
Talk about padding the script to make more money!!! tedzbear Dec 2012 #16
Jackson has very little to do with Hollywood tama Dec 2012 #28
I hear you can almost hear souls of all the animals cruely abused in the special thanks credits n/t Earth_First Dec 2012 #18
You base this statement on what evidence? Hekate Dec 2012 #23
tons of evidence. Here, take your pick. There is NO dispute that cali Dec 2012 #30
I saw that on the news too Cali. Howler Dec 2012 #33
... and the folks who made those claims were fired from the production team TWO YEARS AGO. Myrina Dec 2012 #36
bullfuckingshit, honey: From the article YOU linked: cali Dec 2012 #43
I would love to see your reasoning behind that accusation. Marrah_G Dec 2012 #41
I can't wait to go see it Aerows Dec 2012 #19
The opening minutes of The Fellowship pulled me in at once Hekate Dec 2012 #24
I just saw the advertisement for it Aerows Dec 2012 #25
"Extended" versions are much better tama Dec 2012 #29
I have all three of them Aerows Dec 2012 #31
Just before LOTR3 came out I got to see the others again on big screen Hekate Dec 2012 #34
Can't wait to see them. n/t MuseRider Dec 2012 #32
As mentioned in another reply, I can't go see it since animals died. Avalux Dec 2012 #35
False Myrina Dec 2012 #37
you can listen to the soundtrack free at Rolling Stone's website eShirl Dec 2012 #38
This was my introduction to fantasy novels Marrah_G Dec 2012 #39

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
2. You mean go see
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 05:22 AM
Nov 2012

three movies - two of which are unnecessary - and keep New Line flush with cash?

How does New Zealand benefit from me seeing this? They've already reaped the benefits of this movie - the local caterers aren't paid on spec.

eShirl

(18,477 posts)
3. As long as Jackson keeps turning the studio's money into more money,
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 05:31 AM
Nov 2012

Last edited Wed Nov 28, 2012, 07:31 AM - Edit history (1)

they will keep giving him money to make movies, which he likes to do in NZ.

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
4. Ah, ok
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 03:58 AM
Nov 2012

Well, given that, I'd rather spend my money on a director who'll spend his money in the US.

And I've been to New Zealand and I love it. But I won't spend my money for the express purpose of making sure another country benefits. I may see the Hobbit... waiting for the reviews. But I'll definitely see Lincoln. Spielberg needs to know he has the support to make another movie /sarcasm.

Do you think Peter Jackson's future relies on what DUers do re: The Hobbit? The series will make billions regardless of what I do.

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
9. You really don't
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 03:41 AM
Dec 2012

feel taken advantage of by turning a small book into three movies?

Maybe it's just me. I think it's crass Hollywood cash-generating cynicism at its worst.

JI7

(89,235 posts)
13. clips show Galadriel who wasn't in the Hobbit
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 04:12 AM
Dec 2012

my guess is the film will include things we know from LOTR . it's not just straight from the Hobbit.

i might feel taken advantage of if the movies suck and it does seem like they include a bunch of things or drags on just so they could have more than 1 or 2 films.

but if it's done right and entertaining i would be happy about 3.

also, you don't have to watch the movies if you feel that way at this point. wait until the reviews and if they suck don't watch or wait until you can rent it or watch on tv.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,258 posts)
17. Spoilers (if that's neccessary)
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 08:58 AM
Dec 2012

The Hobbit does have Gandalf leaving the group, after the episode with Beorn if I remember correctly, to go and take part in the White Council's attack on the Necromancer (ie Sauron) in Dol Guldur, and Galadriel was in the Council, even if she wasn't mentioned in The Hobbit. So they may be just filling things that were background in The Hobbit - which are conveniently action-filled and suitable for large screen special effects.

And, even more than LOTR, The Hobbit is lacking female characters, so I'm not surprised they've brought Galadriel in. The Hobbit makes the Republican party look gender-balanced.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
15. No. Peter Jackson did an outstanding job with LOTR
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 05:09 AM
Dec 2012

I'm sure his version of The Hobbit will be as good.

eShirl

(18,477 posts)
22. I felt taken advantage of by Rankin/Bass's The Hobbit
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:30 AM
Dec 2012

And Bakshi's The Lord of the Rings.

Jackson did well enough with The Lord of the Rings that I expect The Hobbit will be worth seeing.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
27. No
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 04:34 AM
Dec 2012

The main fault of the Lord of the Rings is that it is way too short. Fans and Tolkien Geeks accept Jackson to carry the mantel and wish more and more goodies to gawk.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
40. Not at all- In fact I am happy they are doing it
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:31 PM
Dec 2012

The more details they can include, the better it will be.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
5. The 3 LOTR movies were one hell of a fucking rush and EXCELLENTLY executed.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 04:23 AM
Nov 2012

Fuck, yes, I'll go see the Hobbit movies. In the theater even.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
7. Of the original Tolkein books, The Hobbit was always my favorite.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 05:40 AM
Nov 2012

I will definitely see that one in theater. Really looking forward to it.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
10. I'd only be interested for the Star Trek preview. And that's only in IMAX,
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 03:47 AM
Dec 2012

which I can't watch without getting sick.

Tolkien bores me, sorry.

GReedDiamond

(5,310 posts)
11. The exact moment I clicked on this thread...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 03:50 AM
Dec 2012

...there was a commercial on TNT for The Hobbit.

I have TNT on (via Dish), with Total Recall playing in the background.

I was not aware of The Hobbit movie until that exact moment.

I know my girlfriend will wanna go see it.

So we will.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
12. I kind of wish they hadn't made the Dwarves look so goofy, but...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 04:04 AM
Dec 2012

... I understand that the 13 characters have to be easily distinguishable. Can't wait to see it.

Aristus

(66,262 posts)
42. I love what they've done to give the dwarves some individuality.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:46 PM
Dec 2012

Because there were so many of them, and so few have anything more than a sketchy personality profile in the book, the screenwriters had to do some close studying of the book, and the LOTR books, as well in order to develop screen personas for them.

For example, Tolkien mentions that one of the dwarves (I can't remember who right now) is hard of hearing, so Peter Jackson portrays him with an ear trumpet. The dwarf Ori had hardly any description in "The Hobbit". However, in "The Fellowship Of The Ring" novel, he is mentioned as knowing a number of different languages and alphabets. So Peter Jackson gave him a prop book and portrays him as a scholar. That is kind of cool for a Tolkien geek like me.

One thing I initially objected to was the notion of "hot dwarves". Fili and Kili are the youngest dwarves, and are played by young, good-looking actors, probably to bring in more women to the theaters. And that's fine; but Tolkien went out of his way to portray the dwarves as being very coarse-featured, and unattractive by human standards (even dwarf women have beards, etc.)

There will be things that many people find objectionable. Bombur, the fat dwarf, is evidently the comic relief. But I'm looking forward to the films, and, based on my affinity for the LOTR films, I expect to enjoy "The Hobbit".

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
14. All 3 LOTR movies were superb. If The Hobbit is as good...
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 05:06 AM
Dec 2012

... I will be extremely happy. Peter Jackson et al. were amazingly faithful to the books, and the changes they made (for instance updating a couple of the female roles, thank you) were spot on.

I am currently reading The Hobbit to my 8 y.o. grandson, and plan to take him to see the movie when it comes out. We tried to buy advance tickets today, but only the midnight show on the 14th is on sale yet.



tedzbear

(1,963 posts)
16. Talk about padding the script to make more money!!!
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 06:27 AM
Dec 2012

At least one movie worth of filler and possibly one and a half. Hollywood sure is shameless at exploitation.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
28. Jackson has very little to do with Hollywood
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 04:37 AM
Dec 2012

you meant to say "New Zealand film industry sure is shameless at exploitation". But don't expect Tolkien fans to complaint...

Howler

(4,225 posts)
33. I saw that on the news too Cali.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 11:38 AM
Dec 2012

And has much has I love the Lord of the rings Movies I'm seriously thinkin about abstaining from the Hobbit because of it.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
43. bullfuckingshit, honey: From the article YOU linked:
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 04:32 PM
Dec 2012

A spokesman for Jackson's production company has confirmed that the deaths of two horses were "avoidable and we took steps to make sure it didn't happen again."

Mark Stubis, a spokesman for the AHA, said that his group did inspect the farm but that the deaths highlight a loophole in their oversight of the use of animals on film sets.

"We would love to be able to monitor the training of animals and the housing of animals," Stubis said. "It's something we are looking into. We want to make sure the animals are treated well all the time."

At the center of the controversy are allegations brought by wrangler Chris Langridge, who was hired as a horse wrangler in December, 2010 but quit just two months later after injuries to two horses resulted in one having to be euthanized. Langridge characterized the facility as being full of "death traps."

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
19. I can't wait to go see it
Sat Dec 1, 2012, 09:15 AM
Dec 2012

It was a phenomenal experience for me to see all three of them in the theater. I remember the rush I got during the scene in the Two Towers where they are going down the river and pass the statues of the kings. It was fantastic to see all of it come to life.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
24. The opening minutes of The Fellowship pulled me in at once
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 03:18 AM
Dec 2012

And when the camera brought us in to The Shire, it was everything I ever imagined it would be.

I first read the books the summer of 1965, along with a whole generation of my peers. (Not that I ever actually discussed it with anyone -- I grew up a solitary F&SF reader, so never knew who else might even be interested.) However, the fan base for the books became enormous over time, and we had wanted a production of this caliber for decades and decades. Peter Jackson did not disappoint.

I saw each of the episodes in the theater several times, knowing I wouldn't get another chance to see it on the big screen. The audiences differed -- when I went with my retired movie-buddies, we had a mix of older and college-age viewers (time of day + proximity to the university). One of the times I saw Two Towers it was a matinee absolutely stuffed with teenaged boys (after school, downtown theater). They were adorable in their enthusiasm -- the ones in the row in front of me were overcome with admiration when Legolas leapt onto his horse, cape swirling.

Not sure why various respondents in this thread are so aggrieved at the thought of a filmmaker making money, nor do I understand why -- since none of them are apparently fans of LOTR in the first place -- they feel called upon to attack the number and presumed quality of The Hobbit films. They don't have to go see it -- not anyplace, not any time. It's their loss -- but it might be polite on their part to leave the topic alone.

Hekate

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
25. I just saw the advertisement for it
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 12:23 AM
Dec 2012

beautiful. and they should leave the topic alone. It is amazing . Can't say anything else.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
29. "Extended" versions are much better
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 04:40 AM
Dec 2012

than those cut for movie audiences. I would have wanted to see the real "extended" versions in movie theater... boohoo

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
31. I have all three of them
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 08:18 AM
Dec 2012

it's like 9 hours of wonder. I would have loved to see them in the theater, too!

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
34. Just before LOTR3 came out I got to see the others again on big screen
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:20 PM
Dec 2012

My husband taught at the local college and one of his colleagues quietly arranged to use one of the lecture theaters that had a movie screen over a weekend -- a strictly non-profit endeavor, I think we all chipped in for pizza and other snacks. So on that Saturday we saw The Fellowship and on Sunday, The Two Towers, and in the following weeks we individually made our ways to local movie houses to see The Return of the King. What a great idea.

I revisit my DVDs at home every couple of years or so. Nine hours of wonder...

Hekate

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
35. As mentioned in another reply, I can't go see it since animals died.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:01 PM
Dec 2012

I am a Hobbit/LOTR fan, the books are a big part of my childhood. However, knowing that animals used in the films died due to unsafe conditions that Warner Bros. was fully aware of - can't do it.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-207_162-57551648/hobbit-farm-had-animal-death-traps-that-killed-as-many-as-27-handlers/

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
39. This was my introduction to fantasy novels
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:30 PM
Dec 2012

I was maybe 7 or 8 years old.

I cried my eyes out in the theatre during the opening scene of LOTR, the Shire just came to life.

I am really looking forward to seeing the hobbit and I am really confident that it will be well done

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Hobbit