Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:52 PM
bluestateguy (40,060 posts)
50.82% to 47.47%
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AjYj9mXElO_QdHpla01oWE1jOFZRbnhJZkZpVFNKeVE&toomany=true
|
16 replies, 879 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| bluestateguy | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| yardwork | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| yellowcanine | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| Cirque du So-What | Nov 2012 | #14 | |
| dsc | Nov 2012 | #15 | |
| demwing | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| joeybee12 | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| alcibiades_mystery | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| bluestate10 | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| LeftInTX | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| bluestateguy | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| ProSense | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| winstars | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| bluestateguy | Nov 2012 | #11 | |
| winstars | Nov 2012 | #16 | |
| democrattotheend | Nov 2012 | #12 | |
| yardwork | Nov 2012 | #13 |
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:52 PM
yardwork (37,075 posts)
1. 47.47% is just too perfect.
Response to yardwork (Reply #1)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:59 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
2. Yes it is. I hope it stays there. No more, no less.
|
|
Response to yellowcanine (Reply #2)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 10:44 PM
Cirque du So-What (8,907 posts)
14. Well, it could get better...
|
if it became an irrational number: 47.474747...
|
Response to Cirque du So-What (Reply #14)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 10:51 PM
dsc (39,392 posts)
15. that is actually a rational number
|
irrational decimals go on forever without a repetitive pattern. His percent would have to be rational (the number of votes he got / the total number of voters) * 100. Since both his vote number and the total are integers that is by definition a rational number.
|
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:59 PM
demwing (10,979 posts)
3. STOP!
|
counting.
That number is perfect, karmic, and fun to review every once in a while |
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:01 PM
joeybee12 (41,681 posts)
4. If you can find the old thread...I predicted 332 electoral votes and a 3.5%
|
margin of victory one week before the election...bow down before me!!!
|
Response to joeybee12 (Reply #4)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:17 PM
alcibiades_mystery (28,419 posts)
6. Nice try, but there is a search function
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:02 PM
bluestate10 (8,579 posts)
5. GOD. Please stop the vote counting. This IS Heaven. nt
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:41 PM
LeftInTX (2,251 posts)
7. It was short lived: 50.84% to 47.45%
Response to LeftInTX (Reply #7)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:58 PM
bluestateguy (40,060 posts)
8. I love California
|
Hot damn.
|
Response to LeftInTX (Reply #7)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 06:04 PM
ProSense (98,268 posts)
9. Let's watch for 47.47 percent is non-swing states
|
Wheeeee!
|
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 06:47 PM
winstars (1,214 posts)
10. I knew that!!! See below:
Response to winstars (Reply #10)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 06:53 PM
bluestateguy (40,060 posts)
11. He won't get that high
|
He might break 51.0% at best.
|
Response to bluestateguy (Reply #11)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 03:55 AM
winstars (1,214 posts)
16. Yeah, I get that part. I was referring to the 47% part of the post... n/t
|
I incorrectly thought if Mittens got 47% our guy would get 53%... I now know better...
|
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 06:55 PM
democrattotheend (7,442 posts)
12. Down to 47.43% now
|
A bunch of votes from Los Angeles, New Jersey, New York, Philadelphia and Michigan came in today.
|
Response to democrattotheend (Reply #12)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 07:15 PM
yardwork (37,075 posts)

