HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » is "anonymous" ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 01:50 PM

is "anonymous" an accessory after the fact?

if they are keeping evidence of karl rove's felonies from prosecutors, what does that make them?

9 replies, 1004 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply is "anonymous" an accessory after the fact? (Original post)
arely staircase Nov 2012 OP
JVS Nov 2012 #1
arely staircase Nov 2012 #2
Eyes of the World Nov 2012 #3
arely staircase Nov 2012 #4
Live and Learn Nov 2012 #6
arely staircase Nov 2012 #9
tritsofme Nov 2012 #5
Zorra Nov 2012 #7
randome Nov 2012 #8

Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 01:55 PM

1. What prosecuters? You can't withold something from people who don't exist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JVS (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 01:59 PM

2. what prosecuotrs?

well, they could start with their local United State's Attorney's office (he or she wil be an Obama appointee, btw) - or the one for whichever Ohio federal district this supposedly occurred in.

If they have the goods on Rove and aren't turning it over to the DOJ they are as guilty as he, no?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:04 PM

3. Tell your congressman to ask for investigations

 

Tell them to subpoena "Anonymous"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:04 PM

4. definition

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT

Whoever, knowing that an offense has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact; one who knowing a felony to have been committed by another, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the felon in order to hinder the felon's apprehension, trial, or punishment. U.S.C. 18

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/a007.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Reply #4)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:35 PM

6. Not an accessory after the fact at all.

They claim to have prevented the felony from occurring. I don't believe that is against the law at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Live and Learn (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 07:06 PM

9. but are they not now hindering rove's prosecution

by withholding the evidence needed to carry it out?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:35 PM

5. It makes them fiction writers.

If you actually believe this silliness...what does it make you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Original post)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:44 PM

7. What if they already did, and were ignored?

An awful lot of evidence of voter fraud, white collar (bankster) crime, and war crimes has been completely ignored by law enforcement over the past 12 years.

There was nothing we could do about it, we were totally dismissed, and told to "move along, because there was nothing to see there".

Why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Zorra (Reply #7)

Fri Nov 23, 2012, 03:45 PM

8. It's the Internet Age.

They could publish info and it would go viral. They could give the info to Wikileaks. They haven't so it's pretty clear nothing happened on their end on Nov. 6th.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread