HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Things For Which You'd Li...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 04:23 AM

Things For Which You'd Like To See Nate Silver Forecast

Odds of Karl Rove finding out where Jimmy Hoffa is buried.

Odds of John Boner crying when we go off "The GOP cliff".

Odds of Dick Cheney becoming cellmates with Bernie Madoff.

Odds of Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, and John McAfee getting together and acting out a real life "The Three Amigos".

6 replies, 661 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Things For Which You'd Like To See Nate Silver Forecast (Original post)
Kennah Nov 2012 OP
graham4anything Nov 2012 #1
RichGirl Nov 2012 #2
graham4anything Nov 2012 #4
malaise Nov 2012 #3
HopeHoops Nov 2012 #5
Kennah Nov 2012 #6

Response to Kennah (Original post)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 04:29 AM

1. The odds of Nate Silver not selling out like Tim Russert and Chuck Todd did before him(among others)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 07:12 AM

2. Sell out to what?

Nate Silver never claimed to be a democrat or was he biased in any way. He did his job. He is not a pollster, he just analyzes them. His job is to be accurate, not to get anyone elected. His reputation and career is based on being accurate. You think he's going to ruin that to favor a candidate when that in itself is not helping anything?

A polling company's job, also, is to be accurate. If they skew polls to favor a candidate, they lose their crediblilty. Also...it doesn't help the candidate at all to have polls report in their favor when it's not accurate.

Polling companies make mistakes and are off at times...but to claim they are biased just because they don't say what you want them to say...is silly. It's wasted energy and space on a discussion board to constantly question polling.

Newcasters are another story. I don't think they are told to lie necessarily. I think they are expected to keep an election neck in neck to create a horse race. Newscasters are bought with big pay checks and owned by networks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RichGirl (Reply #2)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 08:48 AM

4. he is not the most accurate. Electoral-vote.com has been for 12 years now

 

And it depends if he wants a book that sells 10 million or a vanity production

Tom Brokaw and Tim Russert sold 10 million by selling out.
Tim Russert became the person who ruined Dennis Kucinich

Dan Rather sold a couple of books to his biggest fans and the majority of copies were returned by remaining true.

Book sales are phony.
The big money passed to the author who plays ball is not

all depends on what he wants
to remain a smarmy correct pollster, or to be a rich person and live with his family in luxury down the road a piece.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kennah (Original post)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 07:15 AM

3. The day I will pop that champagne cork because...that man croaked

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kennah (Original post)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 10:00 AM

5. Next spring's last frost. I like to get my crops in early.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kennah (Original post)

Thu Nov 22, 2012, 06:46 PM

6. Odds the Hillary texting meme will outlive the Hitler reacts meme

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread