Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:23 AM Nov 2012

nev. brothel owner rides to victory

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BROTHEL_OWNER_ELECTED?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-11-19-04-10-52


FILE - In this July 18, 2007 file photo, brothel owner Lance Gilman is interviewed inside the newly renovated World Famous Mustang Ranch near Patrick, Nev. Gilman is the first brothel owner to win election to public office in Nevada since prostitution was legalized here in 1972. (AP Photo/Reno Gazette-Journal, Andy Barron) NEVADA APPEAL OUT, MAGS OUT, NO SALES

RENO, Nev. (AP) -- Lance Gilman is a thriving businessman with dozens of employees. That those workers include a good many prostitutes didn't faze the people of a rural Nevada county who recently elected him as a Storey County commissioner by a wide margin.

The Mustang Ranch brothel owner is the first such owner to win election to public office in Nevada since prostitution was legalized here in 1971, Nevada historian Guy Rocha said. And he's believed to be the first to do so in the state's 148-year history

"He's in rare company," Rocha said. "Of course, it's going to be rare because the business of selling sex for money is illegal in every jurisdiction in the United States except in rural Nevada."

Some two dozen brothels legally operate in 10 of Nevada's 17 counties. Prostitution is illegal in the counties that include Las Vegas and Reno, the state's population centers.
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
nev. brothel owner rides to victory (Original Post) xchrom Nov 2012 OP
The Talibangelical wing of the Republican Party won't be too thrilled. marmar Nov 2012 #1
The Talibangelical wing of the Republican Party won't be too thrilled. Flashmann Nov 2012 #2
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 madokie Nov 2012 #3
The Talibangelicals are probably his best customers meow2u3 Nov 2012 #26
any repug doesnt give a shit as long as they are voting for their interest. havent we seen this seabeyond Nov 2012 #10
Like one of their leaders? progressoid Nov 2012 #12
I dont think prostitution should be legal. darkangel218 Nov 2012 #4
Job creator? Scuba Nov 2012 #5
The people are sick of seeing their money sent to a shadow state. napoleon_in_rags Nov 2012 #6
“dye-in-the-wool Republican" who sells humans beings for money. yea, lets cheer. in a rural setting seabeyond Nov 2012 #7
Where's the cheering? RevStPatrick Nov 2012 #8
Do you have a link.. Upton Nov 2012 #9
Notice the subtle use of double entendre in the headline? pinboy3niner Nov 2012 #11
No one is cheering, but name one business that doesn't do the same. Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #13
Happy he won GermanSmoker Nov 2012 #16
except because women are such poor drivers you feel they need their own parking. seabeyond Nov 2012 #17
this is a hoot. you are so fuckin enchanted with women being prostitutes that you seabeyond Nov 2012 #18
Yep, it's the women's business.. Upton Nov 2012 #21
You're wasting your keystrokes LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #22
Hear, Hear. Spoken so well!!! left on green only Nov 2012 #54
A pimp who sells women's bodies, perfect Republican. Odin2005 Nov 2012 #14
Good for him. I think brothels (male and female) should be legal everywhere. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #15
Prostitution is the purest form of exploitation and degradation geek tragedy Nov 2012 #19
uh-huh... opiate69 Nov 2012 #24
they are when there's an element of economic coersion. geek tragedy Nov 2012 #25
Then every exchange of labor for money is as well. opiate69 Nov 2012 #27
It sure feels like it some days... Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2012 #28
Why is sexual harassment illegal? nt geek tragedy Nov 2012 #29
Because it, by definition, implies non-consent. opiate69 Nov 2012 #30
A secretary always has the right to say no to sexual advances and stay geek tragedy Nov 2012 #31
A: Harassment of many flavors in the workplace is illegal. opiate69 Nov 2012 #32
So, if a woman has to engage in those acts to prevent herself geek tragedy Nov 2012 #33
I have to engage in acts I would rather not to keep from starving as well. opiate69 Nov 2012 #36
So, why is it illegal for a boss to ask for a BJ but not ask someone geek tragedy Nov 2012 #37
It`s not illegal in some places for a boss to expect his/her employees to engage in sex acts.. opiate69 Nov 2012 #39
And we have our winning quote: geek tragedy Nov 2012 #42
I`m sorry if that`s beyond your capability to understand. opiate69 Nov 2012 #45
Again, those who are unable to distinguish between opposing geek tragedy Nov 2012 #48
Asking and demanding are not synonymous. opiate69 Nov 2012 #50
Because they've been trained to think of women as helpless children LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #38
Oh please. Opposing exploitation doesn't mean prudishness. geek tragedy Nov 2012 #40
If you genuinely feel that the women at the Mustang LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #43
Meaningful consent isn't a simple yes/no question. geek tragedy Nov 2012 #44
Consent is not determined by your personal judgement. See request in above post n/t LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #46
And right on cue, the slippery slope fallacy makes its grand re-entrance! opiate69 Nov 2012 #47
Incidentally: "Pro-pimp" i.e. supporters of sex workers are "pro-pimp" LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #49
I know, right? Also, her calling all "Johns" "fat ugly losers" isn`t misandrist... opiate69 Nov 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author RandySF Nov 2012 #52
Really? RandySF Nov 2012 #53
Well said. nt redqueen Nov 2012 #35
Well, pimping is pretty nasty, but free agents can do quite well. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #41
Meh LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #20
Fuckin` A.. well said as usual, LadyHawk! opiate69 Nov 2012 #23
LOL, "brothel owner"... he's a pimp redqueen Nov 2012 #34
Legalize and tax marijuana first Aerows Nov 2012 #55

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
2. The Talibangelical wing of the Republican Party won't be too thrilled.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:34 AM
Nov 2012

That,alone,almost automatically means this is a good thing......

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
10. any repug doesnt give a shit as long as they are voting for their interest. havent we seen this
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:23 AM
Nov 2012

Last edited Mon Nov 19, 2012, 10:11 AM - Edit history (1)

repeatedly on the national stage?

they ditch their supposed moral compass always, to get a repug in office.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
6. The people are sick of seeing their money sent to a shadow state.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:52 AM
Nov 2012

We are sick of shadow bankers, shadow security forces, shadow anything. We are sick of seeing our states become bankrupt while the money goes to shadowy drug cartels, shadowy sex work cartels, shadow banking cartels. Therefore, individuals who work in these sectors who are willing to step up, and carry the moral work of caring for the people of the state without shame, are and should be heroes. The people of Nevada thus made a good choice here.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
7. “dye-in-the-wool Republican" who sells humans beings for money. yea, lets cheer. in a rural setting
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 08:57 AM
Nov 2012

where he probably drove the women he sells, to vote for him and little competition.

but, here on du, because he sells women for his greedy profit (any other "businessman" would not get the same applause) we start an OP to congratulate this repug a winner.

interesting.....

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
8. Where's the cheering?
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:17 AM
Nov 2012

What the fuck are you talking about?
I don't see any cheering "here on du, because he sells women for his greedy profit."
It's an interesting article, but it didn't look to me like someone "start(ed) an OP to congratulate this repug a winner."

Upton

(9,709 posts)
9. Do you have a link..
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:19 AM
Nov 2012

backing up your assertion that this Lance fellow drove women out there to vote for him?

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
13. No one is cheering, but name one business that doesn't do the same.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 09:41 AM
Nov 2012

And he is required to so safely, and they are well paid.

 

GermanSmoker

(91 posts)
16. Happy he won
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:17 PM
Nov 2012

Something i wanted to tell you in the Playboy-Quiz Thread:

After 16 years of conservative government the red-green coalition liberalized prostitution laws to make it more like a normal job.
When the Socialdemocrats had their first run in the 70s they legalized pornography. So the things you consider "Anti-Women" came always from the left to help women get out of the dark corners and more into the center of society. Like i said, 50 % of all german men
at least visits once in their lifetime a prostitute. And I'm one of them

Women are treated way better here. We have no debates about abortion. Contraceptives are covered without any debates. Better childcare so women can have a career and childen. Our head of government is female. In a few years there will be a regulation in effect that 40% of all "Board of Directors" Members have to be female. This whole war on women and their rights don't exist here.

And i treat women as equals like i treat every other humen being as equal. But I don't judge women who chose a different path in life.
When a women wants to become prostitute or porn star it's her business. Not mine and not yours.

And I am 34.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
17. except because women are such poor drivers you feel they need their own parking.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:28 PM
Nov 2012

that alone tells me you have absolutely no objectivity, nor realistic perspective.

now, tell me, you are glad this man was elected. a republican. ONLY because he sells women and makes a profit?

well, as a repug, do you know if he is anti choice? do you know if he believes his business should not provide health care and the women should pay out of pocket for protection? do you know if he feels he should get tax breaks and his "girls" should pay more of their money in?

do you know any of his stance as a die in the wool repug?

no.

you simple answer is, yea.... he sells women, good for him.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. this is a hoot. you are so fuckin enchanted with women being prostitutes that you
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:57 PM
Nov 2012

do not even.... at the mature age of 34, consider the consequence to the women you respect so damn much, this man being a repug. YET, as you argue your respect for these women, you have so little respect for women that you buy into the stereotype of sexism about their driving.

totally fuckin stupid.

Upton

(9,709 posts)
21. Yep, it's the women's business..
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 02:59 PM
Nov 2012

though it would appear some here would like to make it their own. If an adult woman, or man, wants to work in some capacity in the sex industry, more power to them....

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
22. You're wasting your keystrokes
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:00 PM
Nov 2012

and painting a big shiny target on your back by talking about how much better off women are without having their sexuality criminalized. Trust me on this one. There are people here who really, really hate that idea.

Keep it up though. The rest of us appreciate it.

For the record, the guy's a Republican, which in the States means that in spite of his brothel ownership, he's probably not a supporter of women's rights. Or worker's rights. Or anyone else's rights but his own.

Welcome to DU!

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
15. Good for him. I think brothels (male and female) should be legal everywhere.
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 12:23 PM
Nov 2012

I'm sick of the government trying to legislate "morality". Legalize pot, legalize prostitution, legalize gambling, just leave us the fuck alone.

Caveat: I've never had a prostitute and don't intend to, I smoked POUNDS of weed, and I don't gamble. It's just an attitude thing.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
19. Prostitution is the purest form of exploitation and degradation
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 02:02 PM
Nov 2012

produced by economic inequality. It's an evil, wholly distinct from victimless crimes like smoking pot.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
25. they are when there's an element of economic coersion.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:42 PM
Nov 2012

Just like sexual harassment is degrading and exploitative.

Same dynamic--economic need leveraged for sexual exploitation.

Prostituted women don't engage in that stuff because they just can't get enough sex from fat, ugly losers.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
31. A secretary always has the right to say no to sexual advances and stay
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:00 PM
Nov 2012

in the work place.

How is that an absence of consent? No one's forcing her to keep that job.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
32. A: Harassment of many flavors in the workplace is illegal.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:28 PM
Nov 2012

Sexual advances do not, necessarily, automatically constitute harassment. Harassment is defined as "the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands." But whatever the case, you`re attempting to conflate consenting adults engaging in activity you find distasteful with non-consentual behaviors.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
33. So, if a woman has to engage in those acts to prevent herself
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:29 PM
Nov 2012

from starving to death and being homeless, that's real consent to you?

Especially in this economy?

How about the women who started when they were underage because a pimp targeted them?

Amazing how liberals turn into Ron Paul libertarians when sex is involved, completely unwilling to examine the issues of meaningful consent and economic power.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
36. I have to engage in acts I would rather not to keep from starving as well.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:36 PM
Nov 2012

I mean, some people may enjoy slinging 70 pound shackles around all day, but there`s frankly a shit ton of things I would rather do. And as for your "underage" tangent, why do so many "liberals" seem to always try to muddy the waters by introducing clearly illegal and unrelated scenarios into discussions about consenting adults engaging in legal activities?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
37. So, why is it illegal for a boss to ask for a BJ but not ask someone
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:45 PM
Nov 2012

to sling 70 pound shackles, if your theory that sex is just another form of labor is correct?

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
39. It`s not illegal in some places for a boss to expect his/her employees to engage in sex acts..
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:55 PM
Nov 2012

(Hint: See the article at top)

Having said that, maybe the reason it is illegal in places is because the people who fought to make sexual harassment illegal overreached. Just because something`s "not legal" doesn`t make it "wrong." (See: marrige equality for example) Of course, I`m not convinced that just asking for a sexual favor is illegal in the workplace. Demanding it, is. Because.... say it with me class.... non-consent.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
42. And we have our winning quote:
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:05 PM
Nov 2012
Having said that, maybe the reason it is illegal in places is because the people who fought to make sexual harassment illegal overreached. Just because something`s "not legal" doesn`t make it "wrong." (See: marrige equality for example) Of course, I`m not convinced that just asking for a sexual favor is illegal in the workplace.


The voice of male sexual entitlement has spoken.
 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
45. I`m sorry if that`s beyond your capability to understand.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:12 PM
Nov 2012

Many people, male and female, don`t find human sexuality to be inherently degrading or exploitative. Interestingly enough, it`s usually the religious fundy types who love to toss around words like "evil" (as a noun) who typically do.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
48. Again, those who are unable to distinguish between opposing
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:16 PM
Nov 2012

all forms of sexual harassment and moral prudishness really have no credibility on this issue.

People who think that it should be legal to sexually harass employees by 'requesting' sexual favors are in the Ron Paul extremist camp.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
50. Asking and demanding are not synonymous.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:25 PM
Nov 2012

And given the number of couples who meet and fal in love at work (it is where we spend the majority of our waking hours, after all) it would seem that there`s no shortage of sexual conversations (and, perish the thought, sexual activity) going on in the workplace.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
38. Because they've been trained to think of women as helpless children
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:50 PM
Nov 2012

unless they fit the (patriarchal) virginity/monogamy fetish, so every sexual decision a woman makes outside that acceptable (patriarchal) mold has to be somehow conflated with the acts of a child. Real Women™ only have sex when properly married, so any woman who has sex outside of marriage must have something wrong with them and can't consent. See how that works?

It's swallowing the blue pill, and they don't even see it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
40. Oh please. Opposing exploitation doesn't mean prudishness.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:03 PM
Nov 2012

Such nuances are lost on the pro-pimp left.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
43. If you genuinely feel that the women at the Mustang
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:06 PM
Nov 2012

are being exploited against their will, please provide proof.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
44. Meaningful consent isn't a simple yes/no question.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:10 PM
Nov 2012

That's the libertarian fallacy that permitted child labor and unsafe workplaces and would allow things like organ trafficking.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
49. Incidentally: "Pro-pimp" i.e. supporters of sex workers are "pro-pimp"
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:20 PM
Nov 2012

i.e. all prostitutes are pimped i.e. it's not their fault, they're helpless children who can't make a choice.

But it's not about prudishness or misogyny or infantilization. Oh no.

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #33)

RandySF

(58,786 posts)
53. Really?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:30 PM
Nov 2012

What about an adult with kids who has to take fast food orders from rude kids all day long? And by the way, underage = non-consent under the law for ANY sexual contact.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
20. Meh
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 02:53 PM
Nov 2012

The headline might as well read "Another old white businessman gets elected". If it weren't for that business being a brothel, this would be a "dog bites man" story. Get back to me when one of the brothel workers gets elected, and I'll get excited about that.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
55. Legalize and tax marijuana first
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:54 PM
Nov 2012

WAY before you start contemplating prostitution. Somebody smoking a joint is far less offensive than a young woman being yoked into a life of prostitution.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»nev. brothel owner rides ...