HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Why did Andrea Mitchell r...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:23 PM

Why did Andrea Mitchell repeat Peter King's version of what Petraeus said

Eff you Andrea Mitchell - you have no credibility whatsoever.

7 replies, 874 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why did Andrea Mitchell repeat Peter King's version of what Petraeus said (Original post)
malaise Nov 2012 OP
1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #1
hrmjustin Nov 2012 #2
Skidmore Nov 2012 #3
nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #4
dennis4868 Nov 2012 #5
Spazito Nov 2012 #6
librechik Nov 2012 #7

Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:27 PM

1. Because the election is over ...

But the script remains, unchanged?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:29 PM

2. She is showing her true colors.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:56 PM

3. I always see her a schmoozer...out to get the

best cocktail party invitations and have the fattest contact book. She could care less about content, IMHO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 01:58 PM

4. Cause we are desperate for a scandal

Headline should be why is the chairman talking of a closed door (read classified) meeting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 02:00 PM

5. If Peter King, a known liar, says it...

IT MUST BE TRUE ACCORDING TO ANDREA...wtf?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 02:01 PM

6. Ratings, ratings, ratings...

No controversy = lower ratings = lower ad rates

Repeating the lying repubs trying to drum up a nonexistent scandal in hopes of keeping viewers watching.

She also leans right which makes it even easier to cater to the repub liars, imo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2012, 02:01 PM

7. cuz the MIC RULES at NBC News. Don't expect anything else, even from Rachel.

It's great when Rachel and others denounce the MIC, but they are treading a fine line when they do that, and I don't expect it from MSNBC, which fired Donahue for having anti war guests in the run up to Iraq. Despite Donahue having the best ratings on the channel at the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread