General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTROVE Of CLASSIFIED INFO At Broadwell's Home
Paula Broadwell, the author who allegedly had an affair with former CIA Director David Petraeus, is suspected of storing significant amounts of military documents, including classified material, at her home, potentially in violation of federal law. A source familiar with case told ABC News that Broadwell admitted to the FBI she took the documents from secure government buildings. The government demanded that they all be given back, and when federal agents descended on her North Carolina home on Monday night it was a pre-arranged meeting.
Prosecutors are now determining whether to charge Broadwell with a crime, and this morning the FBI and military are poring over the material. The 40-year-old author, who wrote the biography on Gen. Petraeus "All In," is cooperating and the case, which is complicated by the fact that as an intelligence officer in the U.S. Military Reserve she had security clearance to review the documents.
The FBI found classified material on a computer voluntarily handed over by Broadwell earlier in the investigation. Prosecutors will now have to determine how important the classified material is before making a final decision. Authorities could decide to seek disciplinary action against her rather than pursue charges. Senior FBI officials are expected to brief the House and Senate Intelligence Committees today on their handling of the Petraeus investigation. The officials are expected to lay out how the case was developed and argue that there were no politics involved.
The case is so critical that FBI Director Robert Mueller may attend to defend the bureau, ABC News has learned. Members of Congress have been angry that they were not informed about the case before the story was reported by the media, but FBI officials maintain that their guidelines forbid them from discussing ongoing criminal cases. This summer, Florida socialite and "honorary ambassador" to the military Jill Kelley received anonymous emails accusing her of flaunting a friendly relationship with military brass in Tampa. Kelley then called the FBI, which traced those emails back to Broadwell's computer. Investigators are said to have then found emails in Broadwell's inbox that pointed to an intimate affair with Petraeus, who on Friday admitted to the affair and announced his resignation as CIA director.
cont'
http://gma.yahoo.com/broadwell-classified-document-probe-114054139.html
ann---
(1,933 posts)to SEE them, but she certainly didn't have the right to take them into her home.
Segami
(14,923 posts)curious to know her motive for removing and storing such classified material.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)One would assume that she had all this info so she could continue writing and speaking glowingly of him which is why he wanted her there in the first place. Wouldn't surprise me if the sole reason she had any security clearance was so that Betrayus could pass her such information in order for her to continue writing and speaking glowingly about him.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Vernon Loeb wrote about his part as ghost writer, which inckudes, apparently, seeing and reading some if not all of that "classified" information.
the way he describes it, Broadwell found and provided the info, and HE wrote the actual book.
As he wrote in the Post: "My role was far less dramatic: I sat in my basement in Maryland and wrote what was virtually a real-time narrative fashioned from the torrent of e-mails, documents and interview transcripts Broadwell sent my way. ...
"I had no say over the books ultimate take on Petraeus, which some have found excessively laudatory. Broadwell was free to make whatever revision or modifications she desired to the text, and did so liberally. "
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-11-13/features/bal-david-petraeus-ghostwriter-blindsided-by-broadwell-affair-20121113_1_broadwell-petraeus-paula-broadwell-david-petraeus
global1
(25,241 posts)with this classified material. One doesn't take classified info just because they can. They have some reason for taking it. I want to know what her intentions were?
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)Plenty of people use ghost writers. Either they just aren't good writers or they don't have the time or inclination to do the writing. She was a biographer and did the research and had a ghost writer do the writing. Big deal. Many many publications are collaborations. What, she's supposed to be perfect at everything?
It's obvious what she was doing with the material. Petreaus wanted her to be his biographer and write and speak glowingly about him because he's a self-promoting bloated ego, so that's what her roll was - it's the entire reason why she was there and given access to all this material. OBVIOUSLY she had all this material because he GAVE it to her for that purpose. They took it because it MAY have been improperly secured seeing as it was in her house and on her computer though she did have the security clearance to review it. They aren't yet even sure if having it in her home and on her computer was an issue or not at this point. And I'm not seeing why she would have had it so obviously in her house or on her computer if it weren't for Petreaus having her believe there was no problem with that.
HE is the one with the ultimate responsibility here. She's just an underling doing the self-promoting bidding of the top dude, and it was HIS responsibility that she got no material she wasn't entitled to and that it was stored correctly. What the hell was he thinking anyway as the CIA Director having some underling glued to his side given access to who knows what material and doing who knows what with it solely so he could self-promote his bloated ego anyway?
She's already blabbed publicly in a speech saying that the CIA was in Benghazi and holding prisoners there which was the reason for the attack. She didn't just pull that out of her ass - she obviously was given access to that info and didn't even know that it was illegal for the CIA to do (which now the CIA vehemently denies it happened of course). How else would she know that and go blabbing it publicly if Petreaus didn't let her in on that info and didn't bother telling her it was illegal as hell and to keep her yap shut about it? He already had a reputation for doing whatever the hell he wanted even ignoring what the president wanted and doing end runs around him.
This saga isn't about Broadwell, it's about PETREAUS and HIS actions that have little to nothing to do with where he was dipping his wick.
global1
(25,241 posts)there was another party involved that she could have passed on this material to - the ghostwriter. I know that this person has been identified - don't know his name. Unfortunately - he didn't have the same security clearance as Broadwell. We don't know the background of this person. He could have been a spy.
Both Petreaus is at fault for first giving her access to this info and even letting her take it and store it in her home. He could have provided her access to info at a secure location - and not allow her to take it with her.
Broadwell - being military with security clearances should have also known better. We don't know how much of this material she shared with the ghost writer or anyone else for that matter. You indicated that she already blabbed publicy. This was at a speech - but who else might she have shared this info with. So I don't absolve her in this matter.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)WTF? Shouldn't this book have been vetted before publication? And wouldn't that vetting by intelligence agencies have turned up questions about her access to classified materials?
Classified info can only be stored in computers which are specifically designated. And such a computer cannot be removed from locations which are cleared to hold both the computer and the information. A private residence is definitely not a location where classified computers and info can be stored. In addition, even if she possesses an active security clearance, it does not mean that she meets the second condition, which is referred to as "the need to know". So there are definitely grounds here for taking legal action should the USG decide to do so. (Just FYI, I am a retired federal agent and worked similar cases).
JPZenger
(6,819 posts)Broadwell I believe had been a reserve officer, so she probably had some clearance (expired?). However, you don't keep classified information on a home computer. Period.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Pursue fucking charges if they are warranted. Otherwise, it's nothing more than a slap on the wrist and leaves no reasons for someone to do this again. If I break the law, I get charges, if this woman breaks the law, she possible gets disciplined? What is this, high school?
Segami
(14,923 posts)High schoolers might have faired better judgement than them.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)There's no real evidence on Manning, only circumstantial.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)for all sorts of things that can be considered a lesser crime. I'm not assigning any kind of guilt to Broadwell at this point but if she is found to have had material she shouldn't have had, disciplinary action isn't harsh enough. She needs to go to the brig (if there is a crime).
MADem
(135,425 posts)Nothing was lost, nothing was compromised. He simply fucked up the paperwork.
It ended his career, and there wasn't shit I could do to help him. I did try.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)A court martial for a Major and West Point graduate is no "slap on the wrist".
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Gives me great confidence in our country's intelligence.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Don't know about the US, but IIRC in Germany that's worth up to 2 years of jail-time for public servants.
And on top of that, they are classified.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)it's called the right to know and need to know. She could see some jail time. Especially if she passed this info on.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Maybe she didn't sneak hard copies out of the buildings. Maybe she got them by e-mail, or by hacking, or even by using the general's own files/accounts.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)I asked sarcastically were they hot pictures or hot documents?
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Depending on classification, only a small number of copies are made, the copies are numbered, you sign the copies out, and they have to be stored in your office in an approved safe when not in use.
livetohike
(22,138 posts)too. Even though it was decades ago.....I doubt the procedures have changed. I can still see the font type on the stamps and the shade of the red and blue stamp pad ink.....
AlexSatan
(535 posts)but if you are in a facility with open storage of classified, it is FAR less controlled.
I used to have classified stuff all over my desk most of the time (even when I wasn't there).
Even today, not working in an open storage facility, I can print out classified without having to log it or have anyone double-check it. The whole point of getting a clearance is that the gov't should be able to trust you.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If she's a spy, she's the dumbest one ever.
glinda
(14,807 posts)about Dems by gleaning documents and passing them to Rove and interested parties. I think this could be big actually. Could be Kelly was also doing the same thing and in the spirit of "jealous competition" or even "warning emails to lay low" this whole thing blew open.
broiles
(1,367 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)DIA?
DCKit
(18,541 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)either...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)sally5050
(151 posts)fuck a general,
take all the documents you like , classified or not, and peruse them in the oh so secure environment of your home.
NO PUNISHMENT...
Don't fuck a general,
take documents, and forward them to an independent news organization that releases the data mostly redacted without impact to individuals
Rot in jail without a jury, trial or sentencing for over 800 days.
Bradley should have found a way to fuck a general! ; 0
glinda
(14,807 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Those who aren't already familiar with it should really look into the series of events which led to the capture of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard, here.
Hit the reset button or put what you know about the case on hold, or just move it aside in your mind: If they really have discovered classified material improperly stored and/or acquired in her posession there is a whole 'nother investigation which will go on to determine everything about the trail of that material, such as where it originated from, the circumstances under which it was passed to her, who paseed it to her, why it was passed to her, and (last but not least) what the use(es) of that material was.
B-L-A-M-M-O!!!!!
PB
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It keeps getting stranger by the hour, isn't it?
MADem
(135,425 posts)AlexSatan
(535 posts)If she has classified at home, there is no "potential" about it.
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)CNN Breaking News?@cnnbrk
U.S. officials: Paula Broadwell's security clearance has been suspended pending outcome of investigations
NBC News?@NBCNews
A U.S. Army official tells NBC News that Paula Broadwell's security clearance and access have been suspended
GP6971
(31,141 posts)what they've done is place an "Adverse" report on her clearance which effectively suspends the clearance until an investigation is completed. If there is no wrongdoing, then the Adverse report is rescinded.