HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » 'Does your husband know y...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:49 AM

'Does your husband know you've been touching Petraeus under the table?

hope both of these women and Petraeus and all the men involved are getting all the attention they obviously needed

Some divorce attorneys are going to get a nice payday soon LOL



It's the daily mall but who cares, more juicy to read

'Does your husband know you've been touching Petraeus under the table?' The cat-fight emails sent by Paula Broadwell to supposed love rival Jill Kelly

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2232133/Does-husband-know-youve-touching-Petraeus-table-The-cat-fight-emails-sent-Paula-Broadwell-supposed-love-rival-Jill-Kelly.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The mistress of shamed former CIA chief David Petraeus accused her supposed love-rival of touching him under the table and asked if her husband was aware of her actions, in a string of threatening emails.
Paula Broadwell's affair with Petraeus was exposed after she sent a series of messages to Florida socialite Jill Kelly, apparently warning her off her lover.







She does have that, "I'll let you stick it anywhere you want for a scoop look"
while petrahorny has that "Can you believe I'm tapping this! I look like a turtle! expression"

79 replies, 5565 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 79 replies Author Time Post
Reply 'Does your husband know you've been touching Petraeus under the table? (Original post)
snooper2 Nov 2012 OP
CherokeeDem Nov 2012 #1
joe_sixpack Nov 2012 #26
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2012 #43
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #47
renate Nov 2012 #57
hrmjustin Nov 2012 #27
HopeHoops Nov 2012 #2
snooper2 Nov 2012 #4
Berlum Nov 2012 #5
HopeHoops Nov 2012 #6
flamingdem Nov 2012 #25
hrmjustin Nov 2012 #28
HopeHoops Nov 2012 #33
flamingdem Nov 2012 #38
HopeHoops Nov 2012 #40
liberalmuse Nov 2012 #3
4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #9
ismnotwasm Nov 2012 #21
Whisp Nov 2012 #29
seabeyond Nov 2012 #42
Lilyeye Nov 2012 #62
4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #68
Whisp Nov 2012 #69
4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #70
Nye Bevan Nov 2012 #75
edbermac Nov 2012 #7
alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #8
Whiskeytide Nov 2012 #18
Carolina Nov 2012 #34
4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #10
MicaelS Nov 2012 #11
marions ghost Nov 2012 #12
seabeyond Nov 2012 #13
snooper2 Nov 2012 #14
seabeyond Nov 2012 #16
marions ghost Nov 2012 #15
seabeyond Nov 2012 #17
marions ghost Nov 2012 #20
seabeyond Nov 2012 #23
marions ghost Nov 2012 #32
seabeyond Nov 2012 #36
marions ghost Nov 2012 #37
seabeyond Nov 2012 #39
marions ghost Nov 2012 #71
seabeyond Nov 2012 #73
marions ghost Nov 2012 #76
marions ghost Nov 2012 #72
seabeyond Nov 2012 #74
snooper2 Nov 2012 #22
seabeyond Nov 2012 #24
MoonRiver Nov 2012 #46
seabeyond Nov 2012 #50
MoonRiver Nov 2012 #54
seabeyond Nov 2012 #63
WinkyDink Nov 2012 #48
seabeyond Nov 2012 #51
aletier_v Nov 2012 #55
seabeyond Nov 2012 #64
cliffordu Nov 2012 #52
Lilyeye Nov 2012 #61
ismnotwasm Nov 2012 #19
eShirl Nov 2012 #30
Carolina Nov 2012 #35
aletier_v Nov 2012 #45
broiles Nov 2012 #31
aletier_v Nov 2012 #66
Liberal_in_LA Nov 2012 #41
Blue_Tires Nov 2012 #44
seabeyond Nov 2012 #53
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #49
rainbow4321 Nov 2012 #58
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #67
aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2012 #79
Buns_of_Fire Nov 2012 #56
aletier_v Nov 2012 #59
snooper2 Nov 2012 #77
mfcorey1 Nov 2012 #60
warrprayer Nov 2012 #65
SaveAmerica Nov 2012 #78

Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:13 AM

1. Good grief...

This is beginning to sound like one of those "Wives of whatever" reality shows...except in this case it's the "Lovers of the Pentagon." Can a Lifetime or Bravo show be far away?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CherokeeDem (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:07 PM

26. You're right!

In fact, I thought one of those photos was of a Kardashian! Are we sure this isn't a script that accidentally was mistaken for a news report?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joe_sixpack (Reply #26)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:38 PM

43. Jill Kelley and her twin sister do have a certain Kardashian je ne sais quoi about them

For their sakes, I hope it doesn't extend to their intellects as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #43)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:46 PM

47. "a certain Kardashian je ne sais quoi "---I'm SO stealing this expression!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #43)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:11 PM

57. they both seem to have an inner-ear problem

{head tilt to the left}

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CherokeeDem (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:12 PM

27. You need a chart to keep up with the players.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:15 AM

2. Sometimes you just need to adjust your petraeus.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:26 AM

4. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:38 AM

5. Could you please keep your petraeus (R) in your pocket

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Berlum (Reply #5)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:42 AM

6. "I don't care what you call it, just keep it zipped."

 

- one of the NYC cops in "The Out of Towners".

On Edit: My first girlfriend called it "Ralph".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:02 PM

25. Is that a drone in your pocket

or are you just happy to see me - PB

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #25)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:12 PM

28. LMAO!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #25)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:38 PM

33. My drone's bigger than YOUR drone.

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #33)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:09 PM

38. New song: I like a man without a uniform

What else can we wring out of this "republatragedy"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #38)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:26 PM

40. "Abc-defghi-jkl-mnop-qrs-tuvwxyz - It's the most incredible word I've ever heard.

 

Big Bird won.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:17 AM

3. When I was in basic training...

The women would have these loud cat fights in the barracks and of course we'd all get our leaves taken away. The guys just went in the laundry room, had their fist fights and left their disagreements there with our superiors being none the wiser.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalmuse (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:55 AM

9. One thing I enjoy about

 

traditional male-behavior: a physical fight doesn't necessarily fix the underlying issue or favor the just party. But it does end things, permanently and let's people move on with their lives.

Quite civilized and rational.

Settling disputes by screaming and scheming seems very inefficient to me (particularly since it never seems to actually solve anything).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:30 PM

21. Well

When my daughter served in Afghanistan she worked under a first Sargent who was just an asshole. Did all kinds of weird shit. He comment was "you don't DO that in a high stress environment with a bunch of soldiers carrying around big guns"

The guy got moved elsewhere after enough complaints. And screaming and scheming by the guys.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:15 PM

29. in all my years of working

with hundreds of people over that time

it was generally the men that were the screamer/schemer gossip mongering/rumour mongering ones.

This was my personal observation and not saying that is true everywhere but just to assume it's women who have these traits and men don't, or as much, is absolutely not true by what I have witnessed over many years with many, many people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #29)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:32 PM

42. i have started picking up on this one too, having two teenage sons and listening to them.

personally i was not much into cliches ect... in high school and even older never much into that behavior. but, ok, we give it to women.

damn straight, now that i have two boys i am calling them on the behavior and saying, wtf is this saying it is a female trait.

even in business i never much listened to it. i always felt would end up nippy me on the ass, even if i wasnt saying anything, so just walk away. i didnt need or want the drama trauma in life or work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #29)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:32 PM

62. I could not AGREE more.

I am in college and notice that the guys gossip and scheme just as much as the girls do. My ex boyfriend's friend was one example of a gossiping harpy, who would lie, scheme and back stab better than any queen bee in high school. However, women are always haunted with that stereotype when it can go both ways.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #29)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:20 PM

68. I've had the exact opposite experience

 

And I suspect many who made it out of public school did as well.

A male bully will beat you senseless, but he won't gossip about you and try to drive a wedge between you and your friends.

A female bully often won't be overtly physically violent (although that happens as well, particularly among the very young) but she will spread rumors and attempt to destroy your reputation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #68)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:40 PM

69. not in my experience.

I guess yours is different,

that's okay, you know.

all kinds of wedges from male bullies in my experience. real nasty shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #69)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:49 PM

70. Fair enough.

 

Although I suspect part of the difference stems from societal acceptance of violence against boys vs girls.

If a guy starts spouting off he's likely to get beaten up.

If a girl does it . . . you sit there quietly and take it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #69)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:20 PM

75. Wedges? Or wedgies? (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:44 AM

7. "Is that a bazooka in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"

This story is getting weirder by the minute.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:46 AM

8. "Dayuum Ladies...There's enough of the Joint Chief to go around..."

"...the Joint Chief is what I call my penis."

- General David Petraeus

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:21 PM

18. Has anyone remined of Eddie Murphy's line...

"I'm a spy, baby. Like James Bond. You know, double oh 7? Except, I'm more like double oh 9 and a half".

Fitting with the new Bond film out this past weekend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:41 PM

34. or chief's

joint

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:56 AM

10. Highschool stuff

 

funny . . . if these people weren't in charge of our safety.

Our sexual prudery is more than just silly; apparently it's actually making us less safe.

Let's discard it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:00 PM

11. This just gets stranger by the day. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:05 PM

12. "I look like a turtle"...

sorry to turtle lookalikes, but I did laugh...

Poor Betrayus--his concubine isn't gonna see him the same way anymore...she's not about "true luv." He's small turtle again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #12)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:06 PM

13. she wouldnt be a concubine, either. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #13)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:14 PM

14. swingers?

floozy? debaucher? womanizer? hussy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Reply #14)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:18 PM

16. could be swingers. i dont know if they were swingin'. floozy? for having sex? no more so than

him. so are you going to call him a floozy? womanizer? no more so than her being a manizer. hussy? really? again, is there a problem with a woman having sex.

but, she is not in a subservient role so she is not a concubine.

i get it. i get that you men need to have women serve you in a subservient manner. but, this is not it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #13)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:16 PM

15. So what is PC for his ?

I use concubine loosely like consort or paramour--I use the words interchangeably re gender.

Would extracurricular fuckbuddy be better? What would you prefer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #15)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:21 PM

17. fuckbuddy would be more accurate. calling her something that isnt, isnt about PC.

or, now, when people just say something wrong, are we really gonna jump up and down and yell pc police, when corrected?

you might better question why all the names we have for women when it comes to sexuality makes them powerless, without rights, control or voice.

dontcha think?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #17)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:28 PM

20. I don't think the word's going to go away

I think you can call a woman's "other man" a concubine. In this case, the man is a general and they are in fact, not equals. So I see her as more his concubine. I could imagine it the other way around, as women get more power.

I think the way to deal with PC terms is to question them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #20)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:33 PM

23. it isnt a matter of a word going away. it is a matter of using a word appropriately.

con·cu·bine/ˈkäNGkyo͝oˌbīn/
Noun:
(in polygamous societies) A woman who lives with a man but has lower status than his wife or wives.
A mistress.


she is not kept. she is not servicing anymore than he is. she is making her choices independent of him.

it has nothing to do with pc. it has everything to do with proper usage of a word

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #23)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:31 PM

32. Agree in part

eg. I don't use the word "mistress." But I do use "concubine" as meaning illicit consort for either gender.
If you don't like this, what other word is there?

In this case I do think this woman has a lower status than the wife, as far as society is concerned. How could she have the same status?

An interesting question would be how does Paula's husband feel about it? -- ie. what name would he give to HER concubine?

Should we just go with girlfriend and boyfriend then? But that doesn't distinguish between the unmarried terms.

It is confusing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #32)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:55 PM

36. concubine is an ownership. on the point of slavery. the lower status of wife

is really saying something. no voice. no rights. no anything. ownership.

that is not what this is.

what would i call a woman fucking around with a man who is fucking around while both are married. i dont need to name call. i dont know. assholes. jerks.

geez. and what name would petreaus wife give to him. fucker?? asshole??

what you are not getting is you keep putting womens sexuality in ownership of some man. being it the general or the hubby.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #36)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:07 PM

37. You say

you're not name calling and then you use 3 negative epithets for the principles in the liaison.

I'm not putting anything in terms of ownership. I'm agreeing it is done by either sex these days. I'm looking for a mere term for the relationship that is not a cuss word. So for my own purposes, I just call all cases of it "concubinage." I guess I don't ever see it as a relationship of equality. Not if it's an extended affair. You do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #37)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:17 PM

39. ya gotta have a name that applies. literally applies. adulterers. and yes. i do see sexual

relationships between two adults as equal.

if there was a condition where one has power over the other, or some evidence power was used over another. then i would be right there

i see two users using each other for their reasons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #39)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:13 PM

71. AP is going with "paramour"

--"a male or female lover, usually illicit" is the common definition...

AP source: "Target of emails from Petraeus paramour is State Department military liaison"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ap-source-target-of-emails-from-petraeus-paramour-is-state-department-military-liaison/2012/11/11/82e7de62-2c35-11e2-b631-2aad9d9c73ac_story.html

OK so I will go with "paramour" --is that a good compromise here?

(adulterer sounds too biblical for me)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #71)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:13 PM

73. bah hahahaha

Last edited Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:46 PM - Edit history (1)

i have been so busy and saw that you posted a reply. i am thinkin thinkin thinkin and decided i had to go to a thesaurus. and how i am just not up on cool, hip words that is two adults fuckin each other behind partners backs.

that sounds perfect marion. seems to be the word.

A lover, especially one in an adulterous relationship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #73)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:31 PM

76. We both have had to consult theasauri...



Yeah maybe there's a point to reviving the medieval word "par amour" (I think comes from Fr.) since it is uni-sex.

-------------
Some poster on a blog points out that it sounds more chic than "Adulterer"

Paramour is not so much ‘illicit’ as ‘destructive, an indulgence of betrayal for momentary or temporary pleasure’. Perhaps the word paramour implies an affluent or aristocratic setting. The formality of referring to an adulterer as a ‘paramour’, as in, ‘affair of the heart (l’ amour)’ – a seedy and scarcely hidden refuge of those that marry for family or monetary advantage, rather than respect and affection for a mate.

On a lighter note, this was posted:

"Down south, we often confuse “paramour” with its homonym, “power mower.” Then again, it’s great when you can get your paramour to cut your grass."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #39)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:45 PM

72. But what if she's a succubus

Last edited Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:16 PM - Edit history (1)

In that case, it's not equal & she's the predator This is a dual gender demon:

"In folklore traced back to medieval legend, a succubus (plural succubi) is a female demon or supernatural being appearing in dreams, who takes the form of a human woman in order to seduce men, usually through sexual intercourse. The male counterpart is the incubus. Religious traditions hold that repeated intercourse with a succubus may result in the deterioration of health or even death."

He doesn't seem like an incubus--he risked and lost too much in the deal. An incubus would be like a rapist.

"An incubus (nominal form constructed from the Latin verb, incubo, incubare, or "to lie upon") is a demon in male form who, according to a number of mythological and legendary traditions, lies upon sleepers, especially women, in order to have sexual intercourse with them. Its female counterpart is the succubus."

Just speculating here...not arguing with you. (I mean, who really knows?...but in this case it seems to me that SHE has the power....the power to destroy...)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marions ghost (Reply #72)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:15 PM

74. then he is a dead man walking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #17)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:32 PM

22. dominatrix

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Reply #22)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:34 PM

24. do you know this to be true? i havent heard. but wtf, who knows. maybe. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #24)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:44 PM

46. My husband mentioned how muscular her arms are, and that she participates in Iron Men.

Maybe Broadwell and Petraeus were kinky. Who knows?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #46)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:49 PM

50. or maybe she is in hell of good shape. she isnt a wallflower, though. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #50)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:00 PM

54. I think she is in really good shape.

But you know how these rumors escalate day by day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #54)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:36 PM

63. ya ya ya, lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #17)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:47 PM

48. That's pretty much a gay term.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinkyDink (Reply #48)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:53 PM

51. fuckbuddy? ah, the things du makes me look up.

fuck buddy 2042 up, 922 down
n. A sex partner to whom you have no special attachment. A person you occasionally have sex with who is not your S.O.

A fuck buddy is similar to a friend with benefits.


3. fuck buddy 1479 up, 722 down
A person who is not your boyfriend or girlfriend (or farmyard animal), with whom you have sexual relations, on the mutual understanding that you both want sex and nothing more.

Strictly, for the term 'fuck buddy' to apply, both people involved have to be single.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fuck%20buddy


*not a farm animal, yawl. lol.

i didnt see gay linked to any of the definition, just someone who is SO for a fuck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #51)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:03 PM

55. Id say she had an attachment

no fuckbuddy would jealous email.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #55)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:37 PM

64. sure. i can see all kinds of reasons. and reasons that has nothing to do with the actual man

or relationship and all about her and her ego. are you kidding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinkyDink (Reply #48)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:53 PM

52. No it ain't.

Might have started there, but not since about 1982.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinkyDink (Reply #48)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:29 PM

61. No it isn't. Maybe it started out that way (I really don't know)

However, I am in my 20s and people my age use the term to describe hetero or homosexual relationships all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:24 PM

19. Ew

BAD visual.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:27 PM

30. Her hand is bigger than petrahorny's

and his hand looks like he has a weak handshake

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eShirl (Reply #30)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:44 PM

35. plus look at

her arms in the sleeveless photo... I can see the dominatrix thing easily

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carolina (Reply #35)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:40 PM

45. yup. it has that flavor

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:20 PM

31. I'm betting both of these women have had boob jobs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to broiles (Reply #31)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:39 PM

66. yeah... their husbands... bada bing!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:29 PM

41. both women are married to doctors. I guess 4 star general outranks doctor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:38 PM

44. God...This trainwreck is starting to make John Edwards' case look classy and dignified

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #44)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:54 PM

53. ha ha. i get what you mean. but, that is not gonna happen. lol. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:49 PM

49. NY Post sez John Kerry and Sheldon Whitehouse both know Kelley's

sister Natalie, because she is or was dating a prominent Democratic fundraiser, after divorcing the Bush appointee Wolfe guy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #49)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:16 PM

58. And that Dem fundraiser guy "loaned" her $300,000


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/battle_john_allen_also_helped_jill_YjkEYUNY2INC4smBMEYqUI

A spokesman for Whitehouse today that lawyer, Gerald Harrington, has dated and "may have been engaged to Khawam." Harrington has not returned a call seeking comment.

Khawam claimed in a July 12 letter to her estranged husband that she took their now 4-year-old son "on vacation last year to Martha Vineyard," where their son and "I had a great time at the DSCC event."
(snip)

"Derry Gerry," Whitehouse wrote. "I am excited to hear that you and may be coming to the Family Clambake. That would be terrific! All the best wishes, Sheldon."
(snip)

That letter was written to Harrington, who has been a fundraiser for Kerry and other Democrats out of Rhode Island. Harrington, according to Khawam's federal bankruptcy filing earlier this year in Florida, gave her a personal loan of $300,000.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rainbow4321 (Reply #58)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:45 PM

67. That's quite the loan.

I'm glad to see that she only has a passing acquaintance (it seems) with our Senators. She and her sister seem like people you don't want to be mixed up with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #67)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:34 PM

79. An unsecured loan (i.e. a gift)

I believe it was discharged in bankruptcy along with a total of $4 million in debt.

http://www.golocalprov.com/news/new-ri-lobbyist-gave-300000-loan-to-sister-of-jill-kelley/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:09 PM

56. Johnny! You stop playing with your Petraeus RIGHT NOW!

"Or you'll go blind," his mother added.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:19 PM

59. can you get arrested for exposing your patraeus?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #59)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:28 PM

77. Yes, and if you don't wash your patraeus every day bad things can happen

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:19 PM

60. These women make the one who drove to Florida in a diaper

seem like an angel.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:38 PM

65. I'm not the first

to notice, but the really sad thing about all of this is how bad the situation is in Afghanistan and these "leaders" seem to be spending more time on this crap than conducting the war.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to warrprayer (Reply #65)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:23 PM

78. Noted here, also. How many inside attacks on US troops in the

past 4 months or so?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread