HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » The rogue FBI agent was a...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:30 PM

The rogue FBI agent was a RW nut

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/us/timeline-shows-fbi-discovered-petraeus-affair-in-summer.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0

Motives Questioned in F.B.I. Inquiry of Petraeus E-Mails


That agent, who had previously pursued a friendship with Ms. Kelley and had earlier sent her shirtless photographs of himself, was “just a conduit” for the complaint, a law enforcement official said. He had no training in cybercrime, was not part of the cyber squad handling the case and was never assigned to the investigation.

But the agent, who was not identified, continued to “nose around” about the case, and eventually his superiors “told him to stay the hell away from it, and he was not invited to briefings.” The Wall Street Journal first reported on Monday night that the agent had been barred from the case.

Later, the agent became convinced — incorrectly, officials say — that the case had stalled. Because of his “worldview,” as the official put it, he suspected a politically motivated cover-up to protect President Obama. The agent alerted Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who called the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, on Oct. 31 to tell him of the agent’s concerns.

74 replies, 7274 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 74 replies Author Time Post
Reply The rogue FBI agent was a RW nut (Original post)
riverwalker Nov 2012 OP
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #1
Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #15
Whisp Nov 2012 #2
bluestate10 Nov 2012 #19
sheshe2 Nov 2012 #33
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #3
yardwork Nov 2012 #4
John2 Nov 2012 #35
SoapBox Nov 2012 #47
Ruby the Liberal Nov 2012 #5
beac Nov 2012 #20
Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2012 #60
fadedrose Nov 2012 #6
jberryhill Nov 2012 #14
fadedrose Nov 2012 #22
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #37
jberryhill Nov 2012 #48
2naSalit Nov 2012 #59
Lochloosa Nov 2012 #25
notadmblnd Nov 2012 #74
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #28
Cha Nov 2012 #30
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #36
Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2012 #63
Cha Nov 2012 #72
Aerows Nov 2012 #71
grantcart Nov 2012 #65
Carolina Nov 2012 #68
libdem4life Nov 2012 #7
Indpndnt Nov 2012 #8
defacto7 Nov 2012 #18
glinda Nov 2012 #52
Renew Deal Nov 2012 #58
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #9
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #13
LTR Nov 2012 #38
msanthrope Nov 2012 #69
LTR Nov 2012 #70
msanthrope Nov 2012 #73
ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #44
Skittles Nov 2012 #23
Renew Deal Nov 2012 #57
morningfog Nov 2012 #10
Jack Sprat Nov 2012 #43
Tutonic Nov 2012 #11
Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #12
BainsBane Nov 2012 #16
Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #41
Historic NY Nov 2012 #17
alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #29
Historic NY Nov 2012 #45
ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #46
Major Nikon Nov 2012 #51
Thinkingabout Nov 2012 #21
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #39
Thinkingabout Nov 2012 #66
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #67
AzDar Nov 2012 #24
WillyT Nov 2012 #26
janx Nov 2012 #27
Pirate Smile Nov 2012 #31
SaveAmerica Nov 2012 #32
riverwalker Nov 2012 #34
HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #40
DallasNE Nov 2012 #42
Marr Nov 2012 #49
SweetieD Nov 2012 #61
LineReply .
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #50
sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #53
PossumSqueezins Nov 2012 #54
Renew Deal Nov 2012 #55
Yavin4 Nov 2012 #56
Major Hogwash Nov 2012 #62
SpartanDem Nov 2012 #64

Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:33 PM

1. I Knew It.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:52 PM

15. Now it makes sense :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:36 PM

2. so Cantor believed this guy that it was a cover up to protect the President

 


and so he speed dialed the FBI to catch it in time for the election?
sounds like?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:58 PM

19. The FBI and Justice department are supposed to stay clear of the Executive Branch.

Cantor was trying to throw a stick of dynamite into the election in favor of Mitt Romney. Cantor failed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestate10 (Reply #19)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:32 PM

33. I am Shocked, Shocked I say

That Cantor would lower himself to such shenanigans!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:38 PM

3. Lawrence O. just reported this as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:39 PM

4. I knew it - he had no business going to Cantor or Reichert. I hope he gets fired.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yardwork (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:36 PM

35. That

 

is what I think, this guy should be fired. As far as I'm concerned, he is unfit to be an agent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to John2 (Reply #35)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:56 PM

47. Ditto to firing but

they do like to protect the crazy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:40 PM

5. Quelle surprise.

On all counts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #5)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:58 PM

20. LOL, Ruby. That was exactly what I said to mr. beac.

And while we're Frenching it up... "Honi soit qui mal y pense" b/c Mr. Shirtless Leaker is probably going down on the ol' U.S.S. Skeevy Behavior right along with Petraeus and Broadwell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beac (Reply #20)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:15 AM

60. "U.S.S. Skeevy Behavior." Lol!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:41 PM

6. I hope the unethical behavior of this agent towards Cantor...

will be just the screw to twist Cantor into staying out of the tax increase on the wealthy. Built in blackmail and they ought to take advantage of it....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fadedrose (Reply #6)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:49 PM

14. First, Cantor is an irredeemable worm

But if this story is correct, he did the right thing.

And that agent should be deciding which side he wants to be buttered on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #14)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:04 PM

22. Diane Feinestein wouldn't agree..

She feels, and rightfully so, that she shoud have been informed long time ago...

The right thing at the wrong time is not the right thing (unless you're a right-winger).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fadedrose (Reply #22)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:38 PM

37. She feels she should have been notified by the FBI

It was their job to notify Intel Committee leadership, not Cantor's. It's likely that when he called the FBI, they told him it was an ongoing investigation and to keep his mouth shut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fadedrose (Reply #22)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:56 PM

48. Cantor had no duty to go to her

Feinstein is saying her committee should have been briefed.

That's not Cantor's job upon being given information by a rogue agent. He went to the director. Whether a Senate committee is briefed is not only not his business, but be shouldn't be the one spreading tales on Capitol Hill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #48)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:36 AM

59. Which leads me to think

That Cantor is doing hat he does best, lying and back-stabbing. He's making it sound like he is covering for his informant because he has no business in this issue.

And look what I found:

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/11/11/a-covert-affair-petraeus-caught-in-the-honeypot/

And interesting pile of stuff to digest. Not sure if I agree with the conclusion but some of the peanut butter on the inside of this sandwich brings out some details that may never have been outed... and connects some dots that have been speculated about elsewhere in our discussion on this web site.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #14)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:08 PM

25. I tend to agree with you tha that Cantor did the right thing....damn that hurts

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lochloosa (Reply #25)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:53 PM

74. did you read this?

snip
So who would have an interest in getting rid of Petraeus? Here’s where the Cantor connection comes in. The tip by an anonymous “FBI employee” that wound up in Cantor’s office two weeks ago came through Rep. David Reichert, Republican of Washington state, who has a friend who knows the whistleblower. Cantor then spoke to the whistleblower directly, who put him in touch with FBI Director Mueller.

Cantor is a great friend of Israel, and Petraeus — not so much. The General was attacked, as you’ll recall, by partisans of the Lobby, including Abe Foxman, when he delivered testimony before Congress citing Israel as a strategic liability in the Middle East. As the executor of the new Obamaite policy of sidling up to Islamists, not only in Libya but also in Syria and Egypt, Petraeus was no doubt seen by the Israelis as an enemy to be neutralized.


snip

Will we ever know the full story? At this point, the story is so hot that it may burn the cover story — “it’s all about sex” — right off the wrapper. Because there’s more — a lot more — here than meets the eye. When Cantor pledged to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he and his fellow Republicans “will serve as a check on the administration” in regard to the President’s policy toward Israel, he was clearly aligning himself with a foreign leader against American interests as perceived by the White House. But would he really go this far — deliberately taking down a key figure, one beloved by Republicans, in order to keep his promise to Netanyahu?

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/11/11/a-covert-affair-petraeus-caught-in-the-honeypot/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #14)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:11 PM

28. I heard on my tv tonight that

Cantor probably tried to push Dir. Mueller on this in order to get it out before the election because he thought it would hurt Obama.

Frankly, I was a little surprised because I originally thought Cantor wanted to protect Petraeus until Mitt was elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #28)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:24 PM

30. Not sure how Patraeus' screwing Broadwell and dumping her.. and her cyberstalking

a 3rd party would hurt Pres Obama? But, I'm sure they could twist it for foxscrews viewers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #30)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:38 PM

36. I gave up a long time ago trying to figure out what Repubs use for logic.

They would have come up with an angle though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #36)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:33 AM

63. They already have. It's basically this, "Obama=bad." The specifics this time seem to be along the

lines of them accusing him of being the one who kept it secret until after the election.

I could have that wrong because it's really hard for me to listen to them very long before feeling ill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dark n Stormy Knight (Reply #63)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:42 PM

72. Eric Cantor kept it quiet. The assholes can keep trying to swiftboat PBO

but it ain't gonna happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #30)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:35 PM

71. Because Bill Clinton had an affair

in the White House, that means every man in America is now able to have one, too, because that is what corrupted the souls of men in our nation.

Yes. I actually heard that as a justification.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #14)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:13 PM

65. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #14)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:23 PM

68. irredeemable worm

LOL... so fitting

Now if ony some Big Fish would come along!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:41 PM

7. Ya think?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:42 PM

8. If he retains his job, it will now be in a tiny outpost in Nowheresville.

Pity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indpndnt (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:57 PM

18. No way he'll keep his job,

unless he has other trash that will keep him in it. It is definitely a fireable offense.

But then he'll just sign on with a private firm or become a soldier of fortune.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to defacto7 (Reply #18)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:06 AM

52. They should give him a psychological eval and take guns away from him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indpndnt (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:29 AM

58. I'm pretty sure he belongs in jail.

And he may not be alone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:42 PM

9. So this agent initially bought into the RW Benghazi Bullshit thinking it would bring down Obama

but as it happens, it may actually bring down the RW shadow govt....


Interesting....


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #9)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:49 PM

13. Exactly.

I like that - Right Wing Shadow Government.

I hope it brings down Fox as well. I think Paula was their "inside source" at the CIA. I have still not figured out if she was coordinating with Petraeus on their "information/disinformation" dumps to Fox or was writing the narrative all by herself.

I can't wait until the Paul Broadwell movie comes out. To me she is the most interesting character in this saga.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:39 PM

38. This whole thing sounds like a Coen Brothers comedy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LTR (Reply #38)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:24 PM

69. Which role is John Goodman playing??? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msanthrope (Reply #69)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:28 PM

70. Hopefully not the shirtless FBI agent

And then there's the inevitable part for John Turturro.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LTR (Reply #70)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:47 PM

73. Turturro plays Eric Cantor. Bet on it. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:54 PM

44. +1 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #9)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:05 PM

23. BINGO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:28 AM

57. No, the agent CREATED Benghazi

The agent told Reichart much earlier than the date Cantor is said to be informed. This is starting to look like a political scandal with Watergate qualities.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:43 PM

10. And he was a close friend of Jill Kelley, who was a close friend of Petraeus.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to morningfog (Reply #10)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:54 PM

43. Why was he sending Jill shirtless

 

photos of himself at the same time PsychoChick was sending her emails telling her to keep her distance from her guy Petreus? Ahh, what a fascinating look behind the scenes of American intelligence agencies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:44 PM

11. Is Don Knots employed by the FBI?

This guy sounds like a total doofus.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:46 PM

12. Ahhhh. NOW we find out why Cantor was called. It was a Republican thing. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #12)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:55 PM

16. I figured it had to be

Why else go to Cantor? It makes no sense otherwise. At least Cantor didn't run right to Fox News. Have to give them that much credit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #16)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:50 PM

41. The reason Cantor didn't go to Fox....

is because the players were all Republican? Sure, it was an Obama appointment (Petraeus), but the CIA isn't a part of the administration, really, is it? And the players were all Republican.

So if Cantor thought the investigation was being suppressed because of a Bengazi coverup....well, he would be squealing on a big Republican hero (Petraeus) and his girlfriend (another Republican). So maybe he and other Repubs weren't sure it would be considered an Obama October surprise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:56 PM

17. He went out of the chain of command to a civilian....thats a no no...

he will be lucky if he spends his remaining time cleaning finger prints ink from old file cabinets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Historic NY (Reply #17)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:11 PM

29. Worse than that: he went to a Congressperson regarding a criminal investigation

That's a big criminal no-no.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #29)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:55 PM

45. Exactly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Historic NY (Reply #17)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:04 AM

51. No

FBI agents are civil service employees, not members of the military. Even if they were members of the military they don't lose their right to petition the government for the redress of grievances just like every other citizen.

So this guy might have fucked up in a number of different ways which may ultimately cost him his job, but going outside the "chain of command" is not one of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:01 PM

21. This should be turned around on Canter.

Canter did not do his job, instead was an obstructist rather than use his time to governor. The whole story of when everybody knew everything. This will be the Benghazi story in the USA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #21)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:40 PM

39. How so?

I mean, how did Cantor not do his job?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #39)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:04 PM

66. When you obstruct instead of governing and you have been elected to Representative

you are not doing your job. If we all sat down and refused to perform on our jobs we would be fired and rightly so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #66)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:22 PM

67. He's obstructed for the past four years

but I've seen nothing that he's done in the Patraeus case that he indicates that he obstructed anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:07 PM

24. K & R

Ermagerd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:09 PM

26. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:09 PM

27. At least he was recognized as such.

Thank goodness.

No big deal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:24 PM

31. Are these idiots ever going to figure out this crap isn't going to find anything on Pres. Obama?

He's the cleanest politician I've ever seen. Seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:30 PM

32. Aaaaaahhh Haaaaah Haaaaah Haaahh!!!!

Children, no matter their place in the country.

This makes me laugh pretty hard!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:32 PM

34. Cantor says he didn't know him

never met him, didn't know if it was credible. That's his story. If there is ANY evidence to the contrary we will have Cantor for lunch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:46 PM

40. I agree Cantor did the right thing...

Even if it may not have been his intent. He talked to Mueller, not to Fox. He didn't initiate a Congressional hearing. He kept his mouth shut. Now, it may have been bc he thought Romney would win, and the career of a republican general and hero would be spared. But, none the less, he went to Mueller and stayed out of it.

Agent appears to be in trouble. Good, he sounds like a wacko.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:54 PM

42. This Is At Odds With Earlier Stories

The earlier story had this FBI agent contacting a Washington Republican Congressman and that Congressman in turn notified Cantor. But there has always been concern with that story because of the passage of time between when the Washington Congressman first learned about this and when Cantor first learned about it. There is also the issue with the woman making speeches on the subject, probably for a fee, based on this inside information. Of course, both women involved have now lawyered up with noted defense attorney's. I am not yet convinced that the Florida woman wasn't more than a family friend any why she now needs a defense lawyer. Because the picture is constantly changing it points to a lot more shoe's to drop, including Cantor's activity in keeping this under wraps until after the election when there were possible national security issues at stake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:46 AM

49. Something tells me Fox is going to lose interest in Benghazi *really* fucking fast.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Marr (Reply #49)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:18 AM

61. I think the same. And if they do my suspicions will probably have been proven right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:57 AM

50. .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:21 AM

53. So was she having an affair with the FBI agent? He is the one she told about the theatening

emails according to reports. He was a 'friend' in whom she confided. I guess she didn't mind him sending her sexy photos of himself.

Nothing about this makes any sense. Broadwell had top security clearance, apparently.

Yet she was going around talking about the Libyan embassy and it was she who claimed that the CIA were holding Libyan Militia members prisoner in the Annex next to the embassy. This was apparently the reason for the attack. To free those prisoners.

And we were told that the US had no 'boots on the ground' in Libya. So why is she talking publicly about all this?

I think there's a lot more to this than we know or ever will know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:25 AM

54. I am waiting to reserve judgment...

until the National Enquirer publishes its story. I hope there are lots of pictures.

<img src=>

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:25 AM

55. And that right there explains the RW Benghazi madness

It's a politically motivated fishing expidition. This has Watergate written all over it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:27 AM

56. The Movie Is Writing Itself

Who plays the rogue FBI guy? Who plays Kelley?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yavin4 (Reply #56)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:26 AM

62. ^Post of the Day^

Absolutely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:47 PM

64. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread