HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Does anybody know what th...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:43 PM

Does anybody know what the fuck is going on with this Cantor/Broadwell/Patraeus/FBI/Benghazi Thing??

Last edited Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:32 PM - Edit history (7)

All I know is Cantor/Broadwell/Patraeus/FBI knew about the Affair and ultimately the resignation of Patraeus before Obama did... and they told him the day AFTER the election??

Broadwell was speaking in public, after 'knowing' she had been caught in the affair and was telling people shit knowbody else knew, in public.... she even said at a speaking event in Denver, in late Oct that they had militant captives in Benghazi and that may have triggered the attack? Nobody else was talking about that at the time?

Here are a couple of other Gems...

Broadwell knew Rove (saw a post and pic here at DU)....

Patraeus had right wing military think tank people in Afghanistan...

is there anybody at DU that is an expert on this stuff, because at this point, I smell a huge rat...

remember, Obama knew nothing until after the election...


on edit, kpete has put a little info together... just saw this post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1798966

and another link from kpete about the right wing think tanks in Afghanistan http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021801412

on edit: post from koko with the Broadwell speech video from Oct http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021802911

added: now the fbi is raiding Broadwells home? http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014302225 http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021803319#post1

57 replies, 3457 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 57 replies Author Time Post
Reply Does anybody know what the fuck is going on with this Cantor/Broadwell/Patraeus/FBI/Benghazi Thing?? (Original post)
trailmonkee Nov 2012 OP
Sheldon Cooper Nov 2012 #1
Whisp Nov 2012 #11
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #20
Whisp Nov 2012 #23
R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2012 #45
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #2
Laurian Nov 2012 #9
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #14
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #21
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #25
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #35
R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2012 #40
MadrasT Nov 2012 #3
immoderate Nov 2012 #4
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #22
MinneapolisMatt Nov 2012 #5
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #30
Gin Nov 2012 #6
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #24
global1 Nov 2012 #7
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #13
sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #26
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #31
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #8
Awknid Nov 2012 #12
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #18
jollyreaper2112 Nov 2012 #10
Incitatus Nov 2012 #16
sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #32
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #33
union_maid Nov 2012 #15
grasswire Nov 2012 #17
marlakay Nov 2012 #28
union_maid Nov 2012 #37
R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2012 #42
Dems50State Nov 2012 #19
GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #27
nenagh Nov 2012 #29
ThoughtCriminal Nov 2012 #34
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #41
Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #36
union_maid Nov 2012 #38
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #39
riverwalker Nov 2012 #43
riverwalker Nov 2012 #47
Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #57
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #44
underthematrix Nov 2012 #50
morningfog Nov 2012 #55
aletier_v Nov 2012 #46
riverwalker Nov 2012 #48
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #49
trailmonkee Nov 2012 #51
global1 Nov 2012 #53
riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #56
CK_John Nov 2012 #52
aletier_v Nov 2012 #54

Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:45 PM

1. I wish someone would come up with a chart or something, because I can't

really follow it. I'm lost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheldon Cooper (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:55 PM

11. here is something to start with.

http://www.muckety.com/David-H-Petraeus/22415.muckety

I haven't looked at it yet - found it linked here on DU earlier and bookmarked it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Whisp (Reply #11)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:14 PM

20. as usual, that just made my head explode

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Reply #20)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:19 PM

23. yeh, I just took a look and it hurt me too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheldon Cooper (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:58 PM

45. Call up Nate Silver.


He's probably free and would take up the challenge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:46 PM

2. The CIA has denied the the militant captives story.

Who do you believe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:52 PM

9. Veracity is not the first thing that comes to mind when I think of the CIA.

I think there may be some truth to this element of the story......but who knows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:05 PM

14. A large-ish CIA station in the middle of the revolution isn't detaining anyone for "questioning"?

It begs credulity.

Since the CIA has had a history of doing this up until VERY recently, with Petraeus being on the ground personally witnessing the CIA doing this in both Iraq and Afghanistan, I just find it hard to believe it wasn't happening with covert approval by the top brass (aka Petraeus).

Occam's Razor and all that...

... says they had people there that the Libyans were trying to break out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #14)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:16 PM

21. do you think they were doing some interrogating?

at a consulate or an embassy, or anything related to that, would put our presence in jeopardy all over the world

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Reply #21)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:20 PM

25. Remember this was a "temporary" consulate that had been overlaid onto an existing CIA station

So yes, I have absolutely no trouble believing that the CIA would continue to operate as they usually would/do regardless of the status change of the villa they were renting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:29 PM

35. I think they had captives....

.... Broadwell was at an event in late Oct and said that they did.... a week later, they outed the affair to shut her up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:51 PM

40. Perhaps they don't refer to them as ccaptives.


Guests maybe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:47 PM

3. I can't keep up.

This already sounds like a major motion picture... so many layers of intrigue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:48 PM

4. It appears that Patraeus was indiscreet, but broke no laws.

The rest is hype the Republicans want to exploit.

--imm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to immoderate (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:18 PM

22. Notice they have stopped? Also, if Republicans would have seen something as an Obama Negative...

Cantor knew and we would have heard something sooner... I think this one is going to ultimately look very bad for the republicans

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:48 PM

5. I was about to post the same thing!

This whole thing is nuts and makes zero sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MinneapolisMatt (Reply #5)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:25 PM

30. I know, I thought I would be a wiseguy and put together a timeline...but it melted my brain after...

about 5 minutes...

it will take somebody with much more mental fortitude and a stash of amphetamines to get through this... I only have weak coffee and half a brain

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:49 PM

6. Some new info I heard on CNN....the agent Kelley contacted became obsessed with

The case...sent her shirtless pics of himself...and is not on the case anymore..


FBI Agent in Petraeus Case Under Scrutiny


FBI Agent in Petraeus Case Under Scrutiny‎
39 minutes ago
A federal agent who launched the investigation that ultimately led to the resignation of CIA chief David Petraeus was barred from taking part in ...
Wall Street Journal9991 related articles


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324439804578115410189757452.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gin (Reply #6)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:20 PM

24. shit... this gets grosser by the minute

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:50 PM

7. MSM Looks Like They Are Trying To Squelch This Whole Thing....

I've heard on more than one network and radio show today that this is only a "sex scandal" and there's nothing else going on. How come they're not asking all the questions we're asking here on DU? Why aren't they connecting the dots.

You are right - this smells. Something isn't computing. It is not making any sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:00 PM

13. I agree. The media is trying to keep a lid on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:22 PM

26. I agree

The MSM is throwing out a lot of shiney objects. They also had us believing it was a toss up a couple of weeks ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:26 PM

31. they all got the memo it looks like

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:51 PM

8. I just can't get interested in this...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:55 PM

12. I don't care about it either

I guess everyone is just bored now that we have finished the campaign

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Awknid (Reply #12)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:11 PM

18. If the Republicans are frothing at the mouth, I know it's a non-story

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 08:53 PM

10. confused as hell

Somehow, this is pointing the stink finger back at Obama the racial epithet. (According to my father, the talk radio listener.) And for some reason Obongo the Anointed One (his terms) is selling the country out to (unspecified) and orchestrating an attack in Benghazi because it is key to screwing the whole country over and delivering us to the godless communists. Or something. I can't even figure out what the alleged fucking conspiracy is supposed to be in the first fucking place. The whole thing about him getting Americans in harm's way and dickishly preventing any rescue is straight out of Rambo. I guess they're cribbing their conspiracies from 80's action movies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jollyreaper2112 (Reply #10)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:07 PM

16. I don't get it either.

At least with the 9/11 conspiracy, the proponents of the conspiracy can claim a motive (The Patriot Act, and the wars).

I still have not heard a coherent explanation of the motive for the Benghazi conspiracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Incitatus (Reply #16)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:27 PM

32. It was to Jimmy Carter Obama

The old Iran hostage brought back again. Worked the first time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jollyreaper2112 (Reply #10)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:27 PM

33. the right has dropped most of the foaming at the mouth since they know they have NOTHING on Obama

this is pointing right at the righties

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:06 PM

15. I'm so glad you posted this

I was thinking of asking if anyone could post a Petraeus affair for dummies thread, with bullet points, circles and arrows and things like that. Because it seems to me that the more I read about it, the less I know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to union_maid (Reply #15)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:10 PM

17. oddly enough, Senator Diane Feinstein said almost the same thing this morning

She said that the more she learns, the more confusing it gets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grasswire (Reply #17)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:24 PM

28. I think they are purposely confusing us

Because they don't want us to know the truth...which I think is that FBI, CIA, and others acting like junior high school kids with the security of our nation at stake!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marlakay (Reply #28)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:36 PM

37. Ooh, that sound right

You might just have something there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marlakay (Reply #28)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:56 PM

42. Like this?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/17/dania-suarez-secret-servi_n_1974111.html

Would those trusted with our nation's security act like frat boys?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:13 PM

19. Just wait till the Republicans scream for blood

 

You know it is coming the Republicans will be mad that the only person who lost their job during this was the General who was Bush Golden Boy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:23 PM

27. Spooks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:25 PM

29. I was trying to remember when Darryl Issa's committee outed the Benghazi annex as CIA...

Did Paula Broadwell talk about the CIA annex in her late Oct speech before Issa's committee revealed it was a CIA base?

I just returned from cookoo land where the CIA Annex has been spun as a CIA detention centre.

Those Right Wing creeps are really creepy. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:28 PM

34. Criswell Predicts Again!

Both left and right will have many conspiracy theories that conform their worst suspicions.

"National Security" will cloud everything.

There will be hearings in which obvious witnesses will not be called and none of the right questions will be asked.

"National Security" will cloud everything.

In the end, none of the official explanations will be persuasive to anyone with a pulse.

"National Security" will cloud everything.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ThoughtCriminal (Reply #34)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:51 PM

41. thanks for the reality check

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:31 PM

36. It's not related to Benghazi. It is as simple as "they" say it is. Here it is:

All the facts aren't out yet, but here's the gist of what I've heard/read:

During the summer, Jill Kelly (Kelly & her hubby are friends of Petraeus and his wife), complained to a friend in the FBI that she was getting anonymous threatening e-mails telling her to stay away from "my guy." (Note: Kelly was not having an affair with Petraeus.)

FBI started an investigation to track down the anonymous sender. It took some time and some doing, tracking through a fake account, etc.

FBI discovered the anonymous sender was Broadwell.

This FBI investigation was a CRIMINAL investigation into Broadwell's actions. Not a national security investigation.

In the course of investigating Broadwell's e-mails, the FBI discovers intimate e-mails from someone who is supposedly Petraeus. FBI doesn't know if it is really him, or someone who is posing as him. FBI investigates this. It also investigates the possibility that Petraeus' email account had been hacked. It also looks into whether Broadwell got access to his e-mails, and that's how she knew about Jill Kelly.

FBI discovers the email supposedly by Petraeus ARE in fact by Petraeus, and that Petraeus is having an affair with Broadwell. This is still a criminal investigation. Nothing involving Nat'l Security.

FBI informed the DOJ, since a criminal investigation now involves Petraeus. The investigation does NOT involve any criminal acts by Petraeus.

How Cantor finds out. This is still murky to me. But apparently, Cantor has an FBI friend. The FBI friend calls Cantor in October and tells him about the FBI investigation (the FBI is NOT investigating Petraeus, remember; they're investigating Broadwell, who is apparently having an affair with Petraeus, and whose alleged criminal acts - the threatening e-mails - are related to that affair).

I'm not clear on what Cantor tells the FBI friend at this point. A spokesman for Cantor says that Cantor told no one about the substance of that call.

I've heard it reported that at some point, Cantor states that Petraeus needs to resign. It was not reported, or I didn't catch, WHEN Cantor said that, or to whom. Or why he was allowed to have an opinion at all.

I've heard it reported that Cantor was made aware on the day of the election, or the day before, that Gen. Petraeus would be resigning. It could be at this point that Cantor made the statement that Petraeus should resign, but I don't know for sure.

The White House is told on the day after the election about Petraeus; Petraeus sends his resignation.

Obama waits 24 hours (tells Petraeus to reconsider maybe? Or Obama wants 24 hours to think about whether to accept it?). Then Obama accepts the resignation.

Diane Feinstein, CHAIRMAN of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, learns about all this on the news. She had not been told anything before the general public was.

NOTE: I heard someone familiar with FBI matters state on TV this morning that it is NOT the norm for FBI to notify the White House or Congress of criminal investigations. That prevents attempted interference in criminal investigations. Remember that the FBI DID notify the DOJ. Still no explanation as to why Eric Cantor was told.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:41 PM

38. Thank you

This is quite the helpful guide. I'm not sure if any of it means anything to anyone other than the principals, but it helps a lot to have the thng laid out like this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:47 PM

39. thanks....

the benghazi connection is with Broadwell talking about it at the end of oct and bringing up the militant captive idea... she seems to be mostly alone in that idea and now she's not talking?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:56 PM

43. How Cantor finds out

Jill Kelley has a friend who is low rank FBI, lets call him Agent X, she reports the emails to him. He then reports this to the FBI who officially investigates. Meanwhile, Agent X is frustrated with investigation and goes to Congressman Dave Reichert (R) of Washington and tells him about the Petraeus affair. Congressman Reichert then tells Eric Cantor (R) who goes higher up in FBI and tells them.
Agent X meanwhile, is sending nekkid pics to his "friend" Jill Kelley.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Reply #43)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:06 PM

47. and if that doesn't give you a migraine

throw in the fact that Jill Kelley (born Khawam) is Lebanese/American (as is Darryl Issa) and Paula Broadwell studied Arabic in Jordan.
Broadwell and Reichert are friends of Rove, and Issa is an asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riverwalker (Reply #43)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:38 AM

57. Hmmmm. That is not what Cantor's rep said in report I heard. Rep specifically said Cantor was called

by FBI friend, and Cantor told no one.

The shirtless pics, it's now being reported, we sent to Jill Kelley BEFORE she told him about the anonymous emails. Sounds like she was having a little affair of her own with Agent X.

Now reported that Agent X is Republican and was involved in the investigation at the beginning. Then was removed because he was too involved. Agent X thinks the investigation isn't being pursued appropriately, so that's why he calls Cantor, who is a friend.

Telling Cantor was clearly NOT FBI protocol, I'm sure. To use my niece's phrase, Agent X, I think, "is in gobbles." (trouble)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 09:57 PM

44. Except the FBI found classified info on Broadwell's personal computer in September

So in September this became a national security issue imho.

http://www.businessinsider.com/classified-documents-paula-broadwell-2012-11

"Well, it turns out that during the FBI's investigation, the bureau did find classified documents on Broadwell's computer, reports the Wall Street Journal.

In September, the FBI began to do a legal analysis to see if there were any charges that could be brought. They decided to interview Broadwell.

During her first interview, she admitted that she was having an affair with Petraeus and gave up her computer to the investigators. On it, they found classified documents.

Petraeus was interviewed too, and he admitted to the affair as well. However, he said that he did not provide Broadwell with those classified documents. Broadwell echoed Petraeus' claims in her next interview with investigators in early November."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:26 PM

50. Your summarizing is consistent with news reports except for the following:

Kelley's FBI friend was barred from participating in the investigation of the threatening emails. And as a result he concluded that the FBI was sweeping the matter under the rug to prevent disclosure of security lapses. This FBI agent reached out to a WA Republican Congressman friend. The Conressman reached out to the FBI and subsequently told Cantor about an FBI agent who had some information about a coverup of a national security lapse. Cantor spoke to the FBI agent and later contacted FBI director Mueller. Cantor described the FBI agent as a whistleblower. Why because that is the only way he could talk to Cantor and WA Rep about an ongoing criminal investigation - legally. As it turns out - Broadwell has retained criminal defense counsel. WA rep has retained counsel. And FBI agent is being investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility for allegedly sending Jill Kelley, the original complainant shirtless pics of himself.

Yes. The story sounds bizarre but the real issue is how does all of this relate to the Benghazi attack? How does it relate to the ME protestors who told the Egyptian government they were paid to protest? How does it relate to Netanyahu's rightwing US tour? How does it relate to the right-wing anti-muslin hate film? How does it relate to Adelson's pledge of $100 million to elect Romney? How does it relate to McChrystal's downfall following publication of an article in Rolling Stones in which he dissed PBO, his commanding officer and other members of the Obama leadership team? At the time, Petraeus was McChrystal's boss. How does this relate to an article about a month ago regarding the military's problem with white supremacists in among their ranks?

It is clear Broadwell had possession of classified information. Did this information have anything to do with the CIA operations in Benghazi? How did the militants discover the location of the CIA's Benghazi safe house? Yep there are lots of questions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #36)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:55 PM

55. You left out the classified documents on Broadwell's computer.

And the apparent FBI raid of Broadwell's home tonight.

And Petreaus setting up the right wing think tank in Afghanistan.

It is all still very messing and going to get worse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:04 PM

46. Looks like FBI is raiding Broadwell's home

Gotta give the freepers credit for this,
they found it almost thirty minutes ago.

http://twitchy.com/2012/11/12/breaking-fbi-agents-raid-paul-broadwells-home/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #46)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:12 PM

48. wow!

if Rove is involved I hope Paula sings like a canary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #46)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:14 PM

49. Yup, its moved into a whole nother level. Wowsa. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #49)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:29 PM

51. i have a feeling this will be watergate big when all is said and done.... it has all the classic

earmarks of a major scandal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #46)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:50 PM

53. If The FBI Found Classified Info On Broadwell's Computer In September - Why Are They Raiding....

Broadwell's home now? What else are they looking for? Why did they wait this long to do this raid when they found the classified info on her computer way back in September?

Something is not adding up here and it seems like there is something ruminating behind the scenes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #53)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 11:01 PM

56. Agreed. The timeline on this makes no sense.

Unless there are forces acting behind the scenes with insider knowledge...


From here on out, I presume that's all we've got. Something shitty this way comes... and all that. We're going to be left trying to piece this together from whatever scraps we can dredge up.

This Affair-Petraeus has a major reek all over it but damned if we peons get any more information.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trailmonkee (Original post)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:36 PM

52. Wonder which countries she is evolved with? That PhD work in London makes me

think MI5.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CK_John (Reply #52)

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 10:53 PM

54. BAHAHAHAHA!!!

Oh my god, I can't believe you managed to drag James Bond into the conspiracy.

That's awesome.

Daniel Craig as her "M15" contact in the movie?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread