HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Petraeus Other Woman - Ji...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:11 PM

Petraeus Other Woman - Jill Kelley

An ex State Department Military Liasion, now lives in Florida.

She got the threats from Paula

From the venerable NY Daily News

A senior U.S. military official says the author who had an affair with David Petraeus sent harassing emails to a woman who was the State Department's liaison to the military's Joint Special Operations Command.
The official says 37-year-old Jill Kelley in Tampa, Fla., received the emails from Petraeus biographer Paula Broadwell that triggered an FBI investigation.
The official was not authorized to discuss the case publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Another person who knows Kelley and Petraeus confirmed their friendship and said she saw him often.
Petraeus quit as CIA director last week after acknowledging an extramarital relationship with a woman later identified as Broadwell.
The FBI probe began several months ago with a complaint against Broadwell. That investigation led to Broadwell's email account, which uncovered the relationship with Petraeus.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ap-source-target-emails-petraeus-paramour-state-department-military-liaison-article-1.1200299#ixzz2BwmBQD31

58 replies, 9143 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 58 replies Author Time Post
Reply Petraeus Other Woman - Jill Kelley (Original post)
Caroline-Vivienne Nov 2012 OP
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2012 #1
SoapBox Nov 2012 #2
HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #9
kalli007 Nov 2012 #3
lalalu Nov 2012 #4
Wind Dancer Nov 2012 #19
warrior1 Nov 2012 #5
flamingdem Nov 2012 #15
lalalu Nov 2012 #52
Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #6
bluestate10 Nov 2012 #7
DURHAM D Nov 2012 #8
underthematrix Nov 2012 #36
Odin2005 Nov 2012 #10
LisaL Nov 2012 #11
Indpndnt Nov 2012 #21
Odin2005 Nov 2012 #37
Separation Nov 2012 #41
Indpndnt Nov 2012 #44
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2012 #12
ananda Nov 2012 #13
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2012 #16
Odin2005 Nov 2012 #38
LiberalAndProud Nov 2012 #45
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #14
lastlib Nov 2012 #17
aletier_v Nov 2012 #25
senseandsensibility Nov 2012 #27
Thrill Nov 2012 #30
Octafish Nov 2012 #32
lalalu Nov 2012 #53
Overseas Nov 2012 #58
underpants Nov 2012 #49
InkAddict Nov 2012 #54
Ruby the Liberal Nov 2012 #18
aletier_v Nov 2012 #24
MgtPA Nov 2012 #31
jsr Nov 2012 #55
alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #20
PufPuf23 Nov 2012 #22
sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #34
PufPuf23 Nov 2012 #57
oswaldactedalone Nov 2012 #23
Wounded Bear Nov 2012 #40
Evergreen Emerald Nov 2012 #26
fairfaxvadem Nov 2012 #35
seabeyond Nov 2012 #43
fairfaxvadem Nov 2012 #47
Nye Bevan Nov 2012 #51
Kalidurga Nov 2012 #28
Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #29
Dalai_1 Nov 2012 #33
Caroline-Vivienne Nov 2012 #39
L0oniX Nov 2012 #42
grasswire Nov 2012 #46
PCIntern Nov 2012 #48
Nye Bevan Nov 2012 #50
LineLineNew Reply .
flamingdem Nov 2012 #56

Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:12 PM

1. You mean the OTHER other woman.

Dude got around.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #1)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:14 PM

2. Chuckle...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #1)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:25 PM

9. I think the preposition is into rather than around

However, that would be a technique-al distinction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:14 PM

3. Googled the name and got a porn star. Alrighty then!

Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:15 PM

4. Wow, gives new meaning to military drillings.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lalalu (Reply #4)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:03 PM

19. LOL!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:17 PM

5. wow he was a player

now he's a joke.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to warrior1 (Reply #5)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:33 PM

15. The Tiger Woods of the CIA!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamingdem (Reply #15)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:01 PM

52. Ha Ha Ha

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:21 PM

6. You could have knocked me over with a cement truck

 

when I heard that a military man had been slippin' around.

Everyone knows that the military, professional sports figures, etc. are paragons of chastity and fidelity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:21 PM

7. The General was busy. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:24 PM

8. Good lord...

The FBI, the House leadership/staff, and now the military is leaking all over the place.

It is no wonder that leaks have been a problem for this administration - too many people are working their own agenda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #8)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:11 PM

36. that's been every administration, something

I'm sure the President before he took office. Afterall, he was a US senator. However, in Obama's administration, they prosecute leakers big time. Of course, they can't do that to Congresspeeps and senators IN MOST CASES.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:30 PM

10. Powerful men cheating on their wives, this is NEWS?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Odin2005 (Reply #10)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:30 PM

11. Yes, this is news.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Odin2005 (Reply #10)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:12 PM

21. Anyone in the CIA having an affair is considered a security risk and will be let go.

And this is the director! THAT'S why it is news. Had he never taken the CIA position, it wouldn't be news, except in the Nat'l Enquirer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indpndnt (Reply #21)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:11 PM

37. Good point.

An adulterous spook is an easy target from a spy posing as a "mistress".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Odin2005 (Reply #37)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:25 PM

41. +1

It was a successful tactic used by both sides during the Cold War. Not saying this is the case here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Odin2005 (Reply #37)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:40 PM

44. Yes, plus a prime target of blackmail by anyone with an agenda learning of the affair.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:31 PM

12. I guess the zippers on military uniform pants

are just as easily operated as the ones on civilian pants...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:31 PM

13. So there were two women.

That never works. What an idiot Petraeus was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ananda (Reply #13)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:34 PM

16. It is always a bad idea to cheat on your mistress

with your other mistress. It really complicates things.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #16)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:17 PM

38. Especially when you are the HEAD of the spooks.

I guess Petreus never got the memo about spooks needing to be careful about who they fuck least they become a security risk.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ananda (Reply #13)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:41 PM

45. Three if you count his wife. But maybe she doesn't

count. I suspect these are just the most recent liaisons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:33 PM

14. Hmmm...friendship..."saw him often"...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #14)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:45 PM

17. "Up close"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lastlib (Reply #17)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:43 PM

25. Photo of Patraeus & his wife with Other other woman and her husband



I got this freeperville, gotta give them credit for ferreting it out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #25)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:50 PM

27. Nice jewelry.

I guess they were at Mardi Gras together. Looks like a fun loving group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #25)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:58 PM

30. He seems to be fine with smiling with men while

While he's banging their wife. Not cool

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thrill (Reply #30)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:01 PM

32. That smile.

Is David Petraeus Dirty? Ted Westhusing Said So, and Then He Shot Himself.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021777389

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #32)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:04 PM

53. It's interesting you posted this.

 

I was just talking to someone about Patreus and how he was regarded in the military. It isn't pretty but many were afraid to speak up.
Patreus had some powerful protectors which may explain why the FBI kept their investigation secret.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #32)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 11:01 PM

58. I hadn't heard about him before. Tragic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #25)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:44 PM

49. There it is

thanks for the post. I was wondering what she looked like

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:00 PM

18. We don't know what their relationship was

It could have been a working relationship that the psycho chick felt threatened by. I am really disappointed that the media leaked this woman's name without clarifying that point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #18)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:41 PM

24. She has a twin sister!

This could turn into a movie script soon!

"Dr. Scott Kelley of Tampa hosted a surprise birthday dinner party for his wife Jill and her identical twin sister Natalie Khawam of New Jersey at a Tampa restaurant"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aletier_v (Reply #24)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:59 PM

31. Apparently, the twins were on The Food Network together.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:06 PM

20. As I said in the other thread, one does not BEGIN such behavior at 60

Petraeus no doubt has a trail of mistresses going back to the Ford administration.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:31 PM

22. POTUS Obama should never had retained, listened to, nor appointed

Petraeus to CIA in the first place.

The man is a War Criminal.

I hope POTUS Obama is much wiser in his appointments during his 2nd term.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PufPuf23 (Reply #22)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:03 PM

34. Maybe hiring Republicans won't be so popular this term. You should never trust a Bush

loyalist and I believe many of us warned about that but were slapped down and told what a great choice it was. Bad enough to have hired him for Iraq and Afghanistan, but then to appoint him as head of the CIA? A Bush Guy?

'Betrayus', remember how the DLCers were outraged over us calling him that?

And I have a question. Is there no Democrat in the entire country who could not have been appointed to these positions given to Petraeas?

Anyone, never mind the CIA chief, who does not know that you do not conduct personal business, like having an affair, through email. That has to be one of the most stupid things ANYONE can do, whether they are a top CIA guy or just a regular guy cheating on his wife.

To think we were told how brilliant this guy was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #34)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 10:54 PM

57. Agree. Not much else to say but hope for better appointments this time.

Appreciate your posts at DU.

War crimes and war profiteering by outsourcing for me overweigh slimy sexual BS.

Again appreciate your posts and smart energy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:34 PM

23. Gives new meaning

to Moveon.org's phrase David Betrayus. What did they know that the rest of us didn't?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oswaldactedalone (Reply #23)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:23 PM

40. Wasn't that what the troops in his own command called him? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:49 PM

26. I am so curious to know what was in those harassing emails.

I know. I know. I shouldn't be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Evergreen Emerald (Reply #26)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:10 PM

35. You're not alone...

I know, I'll have a bunch of fingers wagging at me for that, but hey, I need a break from contemplating the fiscal cliff!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fairfaxvadem (Reply #35)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:30 PM

43. it is more a slope than a cliff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seabeyond (Reply #43)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:42 PM

47. Oh come on...

That's as much fun as folks who say, "meh, this is just about sex!" Boring...

Cliff!! Scandal!! State secrets! Economic Ruin!! Email hacking!! Tax the Rich or the whole country gets it!

The election is over, so hey, we gotta fill up the time leading up to Black Friday and Christmas tunes 24/7 and our constant bemoaning of the crass consumerism of the holiday season. What more do you want to kill a few weeks than a juicy Republican CIA Director sex scandal accompanied with Doom and Gloom prophecies of our imminent financial demise?!

Get with the program Seabeyond!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Evergreen Emerald (Reply #26)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:56 PM

51. Meow meow. Catfight on steroids (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:51 PM

28. The funniest thing is that in the conservative bubbleland...

They think this is some kind of liberal plot to get Obama off the hook i.e. Bengazi.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kalidurga (Reply #28)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 04:56 PM

29. They connect things that aren't connected :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:01 PM

33. Picture of Jill Kelly with her Husband

Note this part of the post

Kelley has a twin sister named Natalie Khawam, a lawyer dedicated to "successfully representing whistleblowers."




http://www.buzzfeed.com/jtes/meet-the-woman-who-exposed-david-petraeus-affair

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:18 PM

39. OK, I'm just gonna come out and say it...

If I were Holly Petraeus, I wouldn't go NEAR that disgusting man.

I'd let him fuck every ho he could find. And he would NEVER TOUCH ME again. No hug. No kiss. No emergency choke hold. LET. ME. DIE.

And I wouldn't dare divorce the fucker either...because they live on her inherited property.

Let him die of some undiagnosed venereal disease.

But, I WOULD call and warn the married partners of his playmates.

OK, rant over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:26 PM

42. So uhm ...he's lucky that Jill Kelley isn't the other pr0n Jill Kelley ...huh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to L0oniX (Reply #42)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:42 PM

46. she looks like she could be a porn star, though

She's wearing a baby doll nightie to a party?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:42 PM

48. This thread is useless without pictures. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Caroline-Vivienne (Original post)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:55 PM

50. So why didn't Paula drive non-stop to Florida, wearing a diaper, to confront Jill?

I thought that was the done thing in this kind of situation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #50)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:11 PM

56. .

that was one of the most amazing stories, evuh!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread