BookTV just played (it's over now) a re-run of the PETRAEUS biographer. CHEEKY BookTV!1

Last edited Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Wow!1 The "wow" doesn't refer to her and whatever her personal or intellectual characteristics might or might not be, but to the cheekiness of the BookTV programmers.

That said, Jon STEWART is quoted (to clarify: NOT in BookTV, but in the NYT) back from when he hosted her on her book tour, “I would say the real controversy here is, is he awesome or incredibly awesome?”

3 replies, 288 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

3 replies	Author	Time	Post
BookTV just played (it's over now) a re-run of the PETRAEUS biographer. CHEEKY BookTV!1 (Original post)	UTUSN	Nov 2012	OP
"is he awesome or incredibly awesome"	PoliticAverse	Nov 2012	#1
Whoa, I was't caring much about the affair story, but she sounds obsessed/stalking more than fawning	UTUSN	Nov 2012	#2
Indeed. n/t	PoliticAverse	Nov 2012	#3

Response to UTUSN (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:26 PM

PoliticAverse (5,541 posts)

1. "is he awesome or incredibly awesome"

Stewart in his comedic manner beautifully pointed out what a fawning bio it apparently is.

Reply to this post

Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 04:19 PM

UTUSN (34,878 posts)

2. Whoa, I was't caring much about the affair story, but she sounds obsessed/stalking more than fawning

There's this other thread with a WaPo article about threats, ewww.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021784706

Reply to this post

BookTV just played (it's over now) a re-run of the PETRAEUS biographer. CHEEKY BookTV!1

1. "is he awesome or incredibly awesome"

2. Whoa, I was't caring much about the affair story, but she sounds obsessed/stalking more than fawning

3. Indeed. n/t