General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAny ideas for ways to respond to the CEOs who fire workers as petty revenge for an Obama victory?
When I first started hearing that bosses had threatened to fire workers if Obama won, I immediately wondered where they all got their marching orders.
I was enraged and wanted to boycott them. Proud2blibKansan asked how I planned to boycott a coal company clearly, bursting my balloon.
Others pointed out that boycotts would hurt workers.
So it is a question of what is the best strategy to get to the CEO and maybe even in a way that the workers will be able to secretly enjoy. I thought about the time DU filled a room with hundreds of dozens of roses for Helen Thomas. Maybe CEOs who play this game with their workers need to receive similar barrages of goods -- just not roses. How about lumps of coal, for example? All mailed to the CEOs.
Something cheap, and easy and legal that expresses our displeasure. Something that inundates the company so that all of the workers know we are on their side.
Any ideas?
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Is that possible?
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)If they are firing people they need to do the job, their quality of service will suffer. This will cause them to either lose business or hire the people back. It is the Invisible Hand of Adam Smith slapping them in the face.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Adam Smith's invisible hand slaps them hard too. I don't want to do that. I want to aim my barbs. I want to stand with my fellow workers who are being abused.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)who (hopefully) aren't jerks. So it may temporarily increase the pain for employees of asshats, but if the business moves enough the jobs will follow along with it.
I think most employees recognize they are alone in the voting booth and have no obligation to tell their employer who they honestly voted for. Some of them may well resent the threat. They also know better than to wear Obama clothes, pins, etc. to work.
Any business that fires employees due to the result of an election is not going to last anyway. You hire and fire based on current business needs, not a scenario you fear may come about in a year or two.
I suspect the businesses that threatened and then actually fired already planned to fire and just used the election as an excuse.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)The workers all in their cubicles suddenly jump on their desks and rip off their shirts and ties to reveal Obama shirts as the boss has a tizzy fit! They do a few bumps and grinds then push the CEO into a chair and wheel him out to the dumpster and tip him in!
What music should they dance to?
iemitsu
(3,888 posts)I thought I detected, somewhere between the lines, that the employees were black.
The news said all black people voted for Obama because they are racist (Colin Powell as proof) so black employees must have voted that way.
It seems, that these employees need to be taught that voting for their own interests is actually voting against their interests.
It may be a symptom of the republican world view's death throes, for Papa John to respond this way to the election results, but it is ugly behavior, designed to terrorize the employees and their families.
The spirit of the old KKK lives in the person of the Papa John's CEO.
In the above scenario, I would have the workers push the tied boss and his chair off the roof of the building, not just to the dumpster and the background music would be terrifying, Mau Mau, jungle music from an old Hollywood, exploit Africa adventure film (reminiscent of the scene from Birth of a Nation where the new Congress eats chicken in the Senate Chambers).
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)I think it is largely BS.
Most layoffs--if they are going to happen--happen this time of year anyway. Been that way for decades.
The employees of those threatening the firings are largely part time so they don't get healthcare benefits.
And of course, as you mentioned, if a business owner needs work done, they are going to hire someone to do it. If they have built a business which is that sensitive to the political winds and tides, they need to re-evaluate the business model.
For the employee's who do get fired because the boss doesn't like a Black man in the White house, the best revenge is going to work for that dickhead's competitor.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)They count on us to cower in fear. Doing nothing makes me feel like I am sending the message that they accomplished their mission. I could ignore this if it is limited in scope, but if it continues to be thrown in our faces, it seems as if we should a least consider a response.
Otherwise we send the message that we really don't stand together in the face of bullies.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm more moved to pity. They have clearly lost their last marbles.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I agree it is pitiful.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)thank you.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)They feed on our fear and panic. We immediately shout "boycott the bastards! Fire off a sternly-worded email! Google carpet-bomb the capitalist pigs!"
If we treat it for what it is, mostly idle threats, and layoffs that would be happening anyway, they don't get their power.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)The coal company that announced to its employees on Friday it was laying off 150 workers (somewhere in that neighborhood) because of Obama's war on coal is using that as a smokescreen.
The reality is that coal has been hit hard. Hit hard but not by any Obama action but rather by the free market these CEOs tout is so wonderful. Fracking has enabled natural gas producers to produce much more gas. That has reduced the cost of ng and consumption of ng has increased. Now usually an increase in consumption only goes so far before demand begins to increase prices. So far that has not been the case.
Because more consumers (individuals and businesses) are using ng, demand for coal is going down. As a result the price of coal is going down.
This has nothing to do with a "war on coal" but a CEO trying to find a way to blame Obama for a decision he/she was going to have to take in the face of decreased demand for their product.
They should be looking at ways to make coal cleaner but also how to mine and produce it more cheaply so as to compete with ng.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)There really is a war on the worker.
chalky
(3,297 posts)I'd like to boycott the ones I can, and keep an eye on the rest.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I will try and start a list here.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)Seriously. Everyone should call their local Democratic headquarters and sign on NOW. We know those MofFo's are gonna obstruct us for the next two years, so let's get a jump on it. Let those SOB's firing folks that your involvement is a direct result of the choices they have made, and that their pettiness has consequences.
My 2 cents.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)to vote those skunks out! (Sorry, couldn't resist). I actually want a badge now.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)And now that I have the Windex out, it appears it's time I back away from the pc and move on to Saturday morning cleaning, LOL!
Thanks for THAT!!!
rrely
(7 posts)straight up, simple boycotts of the companies that could possibly be patronized -- like maybe not that Murray coal company (I don't buy coal retail), but definitely something like Papa John's or any other company that threatened this before the election...no need to be loud about it, just quietly carry it out.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I initially thought boycott was the way, but I want the message sent to the guilty CEOs personally. Maybe a bulletin board of shame with their pictures on it. Their personal bios. They want to be public figures and play dirty politics with workers, threaten to push any of us over a cliff, then workers need to step up and push back.
These bosses are the Akins and Murdoucks of the business world. They shouldn't get away with pulling this crap. We need to find out who gave them their orders.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Glad to see you are ready to fight!!
rucky
(35,211 posts)I'd be approaching all of that company's customers, saying that our company isn't laying off workers and we're confident we'll do just fine under any president - so maybe you should partner with a more stable company like ours.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)The 47% buy stuff too.
For example, the Ace Hardware store in Davis, California. They must have competitors. I wonder what the corporate office thinks of the franchise owner firing employes on such a flimsy pretext?
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/11/09/davis-business-owner-facing-backlash-for-urging-employees-to-vote-for-mitt-romney/
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Davis Ace Hardware owner and president Jennifer Anderson sent a letter to all of her employees last month urging them to Vote Romney when they hit the polls Tuesday.
The store owner described her intentions not necessarily as a ploy to alter the election results in Davis, but rather as a process to get her employees thinking about the ramifications of the presidential election on her company.
It is your choice who you vote for, but I want to share with you my concerns and how I feel it will impact our company, Anderson wrote, before citing several policies, including Obamacare, that she believes will negatively affect her business and her employees. If our company is impacted, it will impact each employee.
But while Anderson did hope to sway the vote of some of her employees, it was not her intention to offend any of them.
http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/city/davis-ace-hardware-president-asks-employees-to-vote-for-romney/
Ace Employee: Don't Boycott Local Business; But Do Voice Your Concerns
http://davis.patch.com/articles/ace-employee-don-t-boycott-local-business-voice-your-concerns-in-other-ways
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)"I am joining other business owners around the nation in asking employees to vote for Romney & Ryan," Anderson begins.
http://davis.patch.com/articles/davis-ace-owner-encourages-employees-to-vote-for-mitt-romney-in-letter-photos#c
ancianita
(35,932 posts)This should be researched, but off the top of my head it seems as if you have a case for wrongful dismissal and being made to work in a hostile environment. My 2 cents.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Those stupid right-to-work states have no legal protections for workers.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)You need to hit these assholes in the wallet to get their attention.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)For taking this kind of crap against workers seriously. Ignoring it sends a bad message to struggling workers that the rest of us don't care. Or that labor doesn't have muscle.
I agree it's time we had a national conversation about tax exemptions for churches too.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)... do not deserve to be tax exempt. Period. At that point, they crossed the line into the "political advocacy group" category. I've got news for them. If there is a god, he/she doesn't give a shit about your petty political arguments, and Jesus certainly would NOT be a Republican. Jesus is exactly what Republicans are against! He helped and fed the poor and sick. He was against money changers. He was anti-establishment. He brought people together. Religious or not, he was a real person and he did said things (although perhaps without the hokus pokus in the Bible). The GOP would crucify him today if he actually did come back. They don't even believe in what they claim to.
off
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Asking if there is something we could do. I agree that we need to. Something like a layoff fund for fired workers, along with a petition to pressure the CEOs doing the firings. It isn't right to let the workers just swing in the breeze. This needs help.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)While I am imagining throwing cream pies in a bunch of CEOs faces!
Thanks for some good suggestions.
apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)including articles about their wealth, homes, affairs, and anything else they can find. Destroy any privacy they may have once enjoyed.
Meanwhile, make some of the newly unemployed famous and offer them better jobs.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)They deserve public shaming. And that hurts way more than anything else could.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)You think they knew who was likely voting Obama? You have raised a very interesting question with your observation that former Repubs were among those laid off.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"vote my way or I'll ruin your life" is not a good strategy. People (dem or GOP) will only take so much shit.
Blue4Texas
(437 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I am Japanese American. After Pearl Harbor, my community suffered from similar kind of treatment.
Blue4Texas
(437 posts)Though the workers that were fired because the president won can receive unemployment, it does not mitigate what translates to agregious abuse. Personally I will boycott "their" services and hopefully we can expose all of those involved who can potentially lose over 50% of their business.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)as IRS auditors, DEP and OSHA inspectors ? Heh, heh....
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)You are a genius!
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)That is the other half of the Rethug plan. It's brilliant. With the House sitting on NO, the Sequestration kicks in unless the President caves. If the President doesn't, the Government is slashed, programs are slashed, jobs are slashed. Tens of thousands of jobs will be lost, and we want to hire the laid off to get revenge? How? We're already looking at being unable to keep good workers in jobs as it is.
No, the Rethugs thought this out, months ago. I only wish I'd have figured it out sooner and sounded the alarm. I wish one of us had figured it out before. Because the fuckers have us over a barrel. We won the election, and they still have the fucking power to completely stymie us.
For now, they want tax cuts for the wealthy to avoid the Fiscal Cliff, but what will be next? Will we sell out the ACA to save some jobs? We have to stand tough, but when we do, hundreds of thousands will suffer. We're dealing with Domestic Terrorists, and we should be able to do something, but I'll be damned if I can think of what.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)They can abort that idea at any moment. I guess they wanna see who blinks first? I am getting the feeling Obama doesn't blink. Staring right straight into little old loser Ryan's eyes. He's gonna have a harder time strutting around Congress now that he's had his comeuppance. He's the new Sarah Palin. And he has no one's coat tails to hide behind.
I think they will do what Obama demands or they will hear about it from voters. January 1 is a little early in the second term to be pulling that crap. At least that is my hope!
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)He hold all the cards. The Republicans are blowing smoke.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Don't tweet the twit, either.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Papa John's (ticker = 'PZZA'), so that I gain shareholder rights to complain to its Board of Directors about the comments from its CEO and possibly even launch some type of shareholder revolt at the next annual meeting.
Still thinking about it. So any advice and feedback would be appreciated. I can buy the single share through Schwab which charges a $9 commission.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Have you ever seen that movie "It Should Happen to You"? Miss Glover does just what you are contemplating doing, and she becomes the talk of the town.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)Being a lone wolf at a stockholders meeting almost assured you will be ignored or portrayed as a crank. Get a dozen or more friends...all attending the meeting and things get interesting. Get 50 people and I'll bet you can take over the meeting. If you're looking to embarrass this works fine...not sure what any long term change it would bring.
Fortunately I live in the Pizza capital of the earth...never had a Papa Johns or Dominoes or any other right wing pizza.
Overall, I'd like to see an ongoing UFCW action to inform people about Schatter's lavish lifestyle and robber-baron operation. While asshats like this and Murray have no shame, they do have vanity and a long term campaign to shine the light on the company...television and internet...could be a real burr under his saddle. The best result is are the greedy bastards get tired of fighting and cash out...
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)John Schnatter is the founder, as well as chairman and CO-CEO of PaPa Johns International Inc., with a net worth of $300 million. John Schnatter has accumulated his net worth through his franchises in over 3400 restaurants around the world. He was born in Jefferson, Indiana U.S.
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/ceos/john-schnatter-net-worth/
his house:
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Papa John doesnt want you to have health care, lives in 40K square foot home, 22 car garage, underpays his employees
Partisan pizza maker, John Schnatter, founder and CEO of Papa Johns, is having a public hissy fit over ObamaCare, so much so that hes announced to the world that he is forced (forced, I tell you) to raise his prices due to the new health care law. Schnatter is raising his prices 11 cents, likely in protest.
http://freakoutnation.com/2012/08/09/papa-john-doesnt-want-you-to-have-health-care-lives-in-40k-square-foot-home-22-car-garage-underpays-his-employees/
a driver for his pizza company earns $6.41 an hour.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)the answer is usually "the Koch brothers".
EC
(12,287 posts)have plans to replace their jobs. Like in WV I'm hoping they have already started something in wind or solar or some sort of production they can do instead of going into unsafe Massy mines.
On edit: My family was WV coal miners near Thomas/Davis and everybody around there wished there were other jobs that paid a living wage instead of the mines. The mines break your back before you're 40 and just wears you out.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)There's nothing I can add you haven't already thought of, I am sure.
Cognitive_Resonance
(1,546 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)which complicates it a bit.
TBF
(32,004 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)You are cruel. And so right.
Illinoischick
(35 posts)But these types of companies have outside firms do their auditing and taxes.
As said before, of they are stupid enough to let good workers go, they will only hurt themselves.
BlueMan Votes
(903 posts)and houses to make them more energy efficient.
or other types of projects to facilitate a new environmentally friendly and sustainable energy-delivery system for the country.
gulliver
(13,168 posts)It's bad business. There might be a few who will "sadly" have to lay off people. And they may say it was because of Obama's election or whatever. But I'll bet the true story for those CEOs will be that they were failing as CEOs and needed something to blame.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)and other info on her actions.
Also see the Papa John CEOs statements.
gulliver
(13,168 posts)I'm actually quite happy for Republican-owned businesses to fire people. It's their funeral. I just don't see it happening, because they know better.
There will be a few local examples, of course. But as I say, likely as not those are cases where the business was already failing and the boss just needed a face-saving excuse.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)They threatened to fire. They now say they will do so or are doing so. The Ace Hardware CEO says that is her plan at any rate.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)And yeah, it has the potential to negatively impact workers.
So do these CEO's feckless stunts.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Pizza and hardware. Perhaps. But I don't want to hurt the workers. I wonder if the ones who were fired were identified as liberals by their fellow employees? The idea that this might be the case is rather alarming.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)ecofer
(1 post)This is a new group page on FB... Help me organize... Administrators welcome...
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Big-Business-That-Hate-Let-Go-American-Workers/251604804965549
librechik
(30,673 posts)as negative as possible and as truthful. Shame them and shun them. Some of them are literally murderers, like that Murray guy.