HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Petraeus doesn't have to ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:42 PM

Petraeus doesn't have to testify about Benghazi now?

That's what I'm reading. WTF?

Coincidence?

Did he give obama bullshit intel re: the attack? hmmm.

9 replies, 994 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply Petraeus doesn't have to testify about Benghazi now? (Original post)
elehhhhna Nov 2012 OP
TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #1
flying_wahini Nov 2012 #2
Iggy Nov 2012 #6
msongs Nov 2012 #3
PufPuf23 Nov 2012 #4
Iggy Nov 2012 #5
underthematrix Nov 2012 #7
Caroline-Vivienne Nov 2012 #8
dem4ward Nov 2012 #9

Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:45 PM

1. It could be that whatever he was going to say was of a nature

that his underlings could also testify about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:50 PM

2. I'm not buying that line...



If Congress call you to testify, you do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flying_wahini (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:07 PM

6. Since When?

 

during the Smirky administration.. and concerning Plamegate.. how many of his cronies were subpoened by congress.. and didn't bother to respond??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:58 PM

3. he has to testify if he is subpoenae ntd

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:58 PM

4. The truth is more layered than adultry I started to type but WTF? .nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:04 PM

5. VERY Convenient, eh?

 

I don't think it's about the General giving Obama "bullshit intel".. I think it's safe to assume the General was not going to play the fall guy for anyone on the Benghazi fiasco.. and he probably made some noise about "telling the truth to the American people"...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:49 PM

7. Petraeus must still testify. It's makes no difference he

resigned. Benghazi does not have anything to do with a security breach. There was no security breach. The ambassador died in the line of duty along with the ex-navy seals. And I don't believe for minute Petraeus was having an affair. I think he's lying about that. I think the most important thing is to protect the real purpose of the CIA operation. I want the senate intelligence committe to track adelson's 100 million dollars and netanyahu's chest thumping.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:33 AM

8. Petraeus will testify if he is called to, by name...

But the 'Director of the CIA' is scheduled to testify next week, and that is no longer him.

Petraeus' Second in Command (I forgot his name) who is now (I assume) the acting Director of the CIA, until a new one can be appointed, will testify instead.

This is my understanding of the situation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elehhhhna (Original post)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:37 AM

9. I was kind of wondering too if it had to do with Benghazi somehow.

 

I'm shocked none of my right wing tea baggin family members haven't spouted this off yet!
Their still stuck on the impeachment plan & blaming the economy on Obama. Now he's inherited his own economy they say LMAO!!! Once again like it just magically appeared in 2008 & once again in 2012. It hurts my brain to try and rationalize their thoughts. ugh

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread