Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe War on Women Backfires - Michelle Goldberg/DailyBeast
The War on Women BackfiresThe GOP thought it could get away with endless attacks on the fairer sex. They could not have been more wrong. How rape, abortion, and contraception led to Republicans resounding defeat.
by Michelle Goldberg - DailyBeast
Nov 9, 2012 10:00 PM EST
<snip>
In the days leading up to the election, conservative pundits seemed confident that Democrats had overplayed the idea of a Republican war on womenand equally confident that women would not turn in fury against the GOP when Election Day came. New York Times columnist Ross Douthat, noted interpreter of the female soul, wrote that Obamas paternalistic pitch assumes that ... Democratsespecially male Democratswin when they run as protectors of the sexual revolution, standing between their female constituents and the Todd Akins of the Republican Party. That conceit, he argued, is probably wrong. On voting day, Janice Crouse of the evangelical Concerned Women for America published a piece titled Obamas War on Women Rhetoric Backfires Heading Into Election, claiming that women now prefer Romney 56 percent to 40 percent Obama.
Then the results came in. It quickly became clear that women hadnt just reelected the presidenttheyd dealt a historic blow to the religious right, helped put a record number of women in the Senate, and become the heart of a new governing coalition. According to CNN exit polls, women made up 53 percent of the electorate, and they went for Obama by 11 points. (Romney, meanwhile, won men by 7.) According to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers, it was the second-largest gender gap in American history, exceeded only by the 1996 electorate. Because of womens votes, Republicans lost two Senate seats they once seemed certain to winMissouri and Indianaafter their candidates made shocking comments about rape, pregnancy, and abortion. Among some conservatives, a realization has begun to set in that they need to start winning over women or get used to being a permanent minority party. Writing in National Review Online, the Independent Womens Forums Carrie Lukas admitted that shed been wrong in assuming that the war on women frame wouldnt work: This should be a wakeup call for everyone on the right.
In fact, never before in American history have womenand particularly liberal womenheld so much power, both as voters and as politicians. There will be 20 women in the next Senatehardly parity, but still a record. (Of the five new female senators elected Nov. 6, four are Democrats.) Perhaps the nights biggest upset came in the North Dakota Senate race, where Democrat Heidi Heitkamp beat Tea Party favorite Rick Berg, who in September was given an 80 percent chance of victory by polling savant Nate Silver. Also prevailing were Elizabeth Warren, the first female senator from Massachusetts, and Wisconsins Tammy Baldwin, the countrys first lesbian senator.
There were so many female firsts on election night that it was sometimes hard to keep up. Hawaiis Mazie Hirono will be the first Asian-American woman in the Senate. Tammy Duckworth, who lost her legs in a helicopter crash in Iraq, became the first disabled female veteran elected to Congress. (She defeated the bombastic Tea Party Congressman Joe Walsh, who recently made news for arguing that abortion is never necessary to save a womans life.) New Hampshire is sending the countrys first-ever all-female congressional delegation to Washington; the state also elected a Democratic woman governor, Maggie Hassan.
Several of the states where women triumphed had particularly large gender gapsin New Hampshire, for example, Obama lost the male vote by 4 points but won the female vote by 16. Its a safe bet that it was these same women voters whove turned the state into a political matriarchy. But the influence women exercised on this years results goes beyond electing female representation. Women voters proved that politicians cannot threaten their rights with impunity. We dont yet know the precise influence that issues like equal-pay legislation, abortion, and birth control had on the electorate. Women are more liberal than men on a whole range of issues, including the strength of the safety net, and would likely have broken for Obama even if reproductive rights had played less of a role in the race.
<snip>
More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/11/11/gop-s-war-on-women-backfires.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The War on Women Backfires - Michelle Goldberg/DailyBeast (Original Post)
WillyT
Nov 2012
OP
WillyT
(72,631 posts)1. Kick !!!