Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:18 AM

Whovian (2,866 posts)

Teabagger, Teabagged and Teabanger all include male genetalia in a sex act. Sexist.

I find this offensive as a male. Can't we just call them assholes as Everyone has one and it would not be considered sexist in that way?

Waaaah! I done got my feelings hurt by a word.

12 replies, 686 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

12 replies	Author	Time	Post
Teabagger, Teabagged and Teabanger all include male genetalia in a sex act. Sexist. (Original post)	Whovian	Nov 2012	OP
They are the ones that assumed nothing has changed since the Boston Teaparty...	Agnosticsherbet	Nov 2012	#1
"I gayly teabagged Lipton" can now mean soooooooooo many things.	DonRedwood	Nov 2012	#5
As I recall......	Flashmann	Nov 2012	#2
Yes, but it's an intentionally degrading action and the teabaggers started using it themselves.	HopeHoops	Nov 2012	#3
Now they want to be called "Scroto-Americans"	Arugula Latte	Nov 2012	#9
I think I'll stick with "teabaggers".	HopeHoops	Nov 2012	#10
Irony though, they were the ones to adopt	nadinbrzezinski	Nov 2012	#4
You think you're clever.	Hutzpa	Nov 2012	#6
What are you talking about? A proper teabagging?	snooper2	Nov 2012	#7
A proper teabagging	PD Turk	Nov 2012	#8
I laughed out loud the first time I heard them call themselves "teabaggers"	cherish44	Nov 2012	#11
They were the ones that called themselves that to start with.	hobbit709	Nov 2012	#12

Response to Whovian (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:31 AM

Agnosticsherbet (1,226 posts)

1. They are the ones that assumed nothing has changed since the Boston Teaparty...

and that a teabag is only about Lipton.

That's OK. Gay used to just mean "happy." Now, it is almost never used in that context.

Reply to this post

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:44 AM

DonRedwood (3,415 posts)

5. "I gayly teabagged Lipton" can now mean soooooooooo many things.

Reply to this post

Response to Whovian (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:31 AM

Flashmann (1,975 posts)

2. As I recall......

These shitstains,in the beginning named themselves teabaggers...Until they began to grasp what else the term might mean,they were quite proud of the moniker....

Recognizing them,right away,for the despicable,STUPID shitbags they are,I found it quite appropriate they'd be referred to,and defined,by what is to me ,a disgusting and repulsive act....

I care no more about their feeling or opinions than I do those of a flea.......Fuck em...

Yes.I do note your sarcasm....I'm agreeing with you....

Reply to this post

Response to Whovian (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:40 AM

HopeHoops (47,675 posts)

3. Yes, but it's an intentionally degrading action and the teabaggers started using it themselves.

They called themselves "teabaggers" before WE did. Remember the "I'm teabagging for Jesus" lady? I don't even comprehend what that was supposed to mean!!! They only changed it to the "Tea Party" after months of us laughing at them over the name. I guess someone FINALLY figured out what it means. They're still teabaggers.

Reply to this post

Response to HopeHoops (Reply #3)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 12:01 PM

Arugula Latte (40,221 posts)

9. Now they want to be called "Scroto-Americans"

Reply to this post

Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #9)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 12:52 PM

HopeHoops (47,675 posts)

10. I think I'll stick with "teabaggers".

Reply to this post

Response to Whovian (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:42 AM

nadinbrzezinski (120,441 posts)

4. Irony though, they were the ones to adopt

Those words early on. I remember an older woman telling a young reporter. "I am teabagging the President."

Young male reporter stood there faberglasted. Vid is on YouTube.

Reply to this post

Response to Whovian (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:46 AM

Hutzpa (10,475 posts)