Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:48 AM
gollygee (12,318 posts)
Seen on Tubmlr: Obviously, they can afford to pay more in taxes
In fact, it would probably have cost them less in the long run.
|
35 replies, 7136 views
 35 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Seen on Tubmlr: Obviously, they can afford to pay more in taxes (Original post) |
gollygee | Nov 2012 | OP |
| Heidi | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| TalkingDog | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| ThomThom | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| txdemsftw | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| Aeroette | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| allan01 | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| BlueMan Votes | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| krispos42 | Nov 2012 | #8 | |
| Coyotl | Nov 2012 | #9 | |
| meeshrox | Nov 2012 | #10 | |
| Whiskeytide | Nov 2012 | #11 | |
| DarleenMB | Nov 2012 | #14 | |
| xtraxritical | Nov 2012 | #16 | |
| Sherman A1 | Nov 2012 | #12 | |
| kag | Nov 2012 | #13 | |
| sebastianj333 | Nov 2012 | #15 | |
| WhoIsNumberNone | Nov 2012 | #17 | |
| dchill | Nov 2012 | #18 | |
| Royal Sloan 09 | Nov 2012 | #19 | |
| Blue_Tires | Nov 2012 | #20 | |
| progressoid | Nov 2012 | #21 | |
| pacalo | Nov 2012 | #22 | |
| flakey_foont | Nov 2012 | #23 | |
| L0oniX | Nov 2012 | #24 | |
| abelenkpe | Nov 2012 | #25 | |
| ErikJ | Nov 2012 | #26 | |
| horsedoc | Nov 2012 | #27 | |
| Cha | Nov 2012 | #28 | |
| WhatsGoodForAmerica | Nov 2012 | #29 | |
| FailureToCommunicate | Nov 2012 | #30 | |
| MrModerate | Nov 2012 | #31 | |
| colsohlibgal | Nov 2012 | #32 | |
| calimary | Nov 2012 | #33 | |
| caseymoz | Nov 2012 | #34 | |
| socialindependocrat | Nov 2012 | #35 |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 09:41 AM
txdemsftw (447 posts)
4. A-F*cking-Men!!!!
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:20 AM
Aeroette (89 posts)
5. Selfish bastards
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:22 AM
6. re:Seen on Tubmlr: Obviously, they can afford to pay more in taxes
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:22 AM
7. after spending all that money- they're tapped out.
|
sorry...
 |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:30 AM
krispos42 (45,126 posts)
8. If they can afford to buy US Treasuries, they can afford to pay highter taxes.
Response to DarleenMB (Reply #14)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:42 AM
xtraxritical (2,931 posts)
16. At least it was in America and they will have tax liability for those profits.
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:02 AM
Sherman A1 (11,533 posts)
12. Well Said!
 |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:30 AM
kag (941 posts)
13. In the immortal and insightful words of Buffy, the vampire slayer...
|
"Does the word 'duh' mean anything to you?"
  |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:25 PM
19. k & r, A very good ? for those GOP leaders, nt
 |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:58 PM
progressoid (27,276 posts)
21. fuckinA!
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 07:08 PM
pacalo (20,644 posts)
22. There you have it.
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:39 PM
ErikJ (2,599 posts)
26. And Rove got 10% of it. nt
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 09:50 PM
Cha (124,404 posts)
28. That's right you Greedy ol Plutocrats! nt
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:58 PM
FailureToCommunicate (4,399 posts)
30. The truth is strong with this one!
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:29 PM
MrModerate (8,040 posts)
31. To be fair . . .
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:08 AM
calimary (30,555 posts)
33. KICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:17 AM
caseymoz (5,166 posts)
34. But those were investments!!
|
Last edited Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:18 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to gollygee (Original post)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:16 AM
35. Now they have NO money for taxes or jobs because they spent it all on elections!
