The Case for Obama: Why He Is a Great President. Yes, Great.

[Liberal_in_LA]

The Case for Obama: Why He Is a Great President. Yes, Great.





I decided to support Barack Obama pretty early in the Democratic primary, around spring of 2007. But unlike so many of his supporters, I never experienced a kind of emotional response to his candidacy. I never felt his election would change everything about American politics or government, that it would lead us out of the darkness. Nothing Obama did or said ever made me well up with tears.

Possibly for that same reason, I have never felt even a bit of the crushing sense of disappointment that at various times has enveloped so many Obama voters. I supported Obama because I judged him to have a keen analytical mind, grasping both the possibilities and the limits of activist government, and possessed of excellent communicative talents. I thought he would nudge government policy in an incrementally better direction. I consider his presidency an overwhelming success.

I can understand why somebody who never shared Obama’s goals would vote against his reelection. If you think the tax code already punishes the rich too heavily, that it’s not government’s role to subsidize health insurance for those who can’t obtain it, that the military shouldn’t have to let gays serve openly, and so on, then Obama’s presidency has been a disaster, but you probably didn’t vote for him last time. For anybody who voted for Obama in 2008 and had even the vaguest sense of his platform, the notion that he has fallen short of some plausible performance threshold seems to me unfathomable.

Obama’s résumé of accomplishments is broad and deep, running the gamut from economic to social to foreign policy. The general thrust of his reforms, especially in economic policy, has been a combination of politically radical and ideologically moderate. The combination has confused liberals into thinking of Obamaism as a series of sad half-measures, and conservatives to deem it socialism, but the truth is neither. Obama’s agenda has generally hewed to the consensus of mainstream economists and policy experts. What makes the agenda radical is that, historically, vast realms of policy had been shaped by special interests for their own benefit. Plans to rationalize those things, to write laws that make sense, molder on think-tank shelves for years, even generations. They are often boring. But then Obama, in a frenetic burst of activity, made many of them happen all at once.

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10/barack-obama-is-a-great-president-yes-great.html

[zipplewrath]

1. Fathom this

"For anybody who voted for Obama in 2008 and had even the vaguest sense of his platform, the notion that he has fallen short of some plausible performance threshold seems to me unfathomable."

Gitmo is still open and we've found out that he has no intention of ever closing it, merely moving it to Illinois.

There are still more troops in Afghanistan today than when he took office.

Two words: Rick Warren

His stimulus was too small by half, he ignored everyone that tried to tell him so, it had too many tax cuts, and he decided to stand pat and let unemployment hover around 8%.

One word: Mandates

He could have suspended DADT while the military did its internal review, but allowed the explusions to continue anyway.

He's never done anything on NAFTA despite campaigning on renegotiation.

Geithner worked to ensure that the bankers would keep their bonuses, and everything he tried on home mortgages has been a dismal disappointment, often by the administrations own admission.

He kept Gates and the command staff and executed Bush's SOFA, even allowing the Sec Def and State to try to negotiate and additional extension in Iraq.

He went to the Nobel Peace Prize Awards ceremony and advocated for wars of choice.

He could find no place in his administration for Howard Dean, but he could find a place for Rahm Emanuel.

If these things are important to you, one might be able to understand how they might decide that he has "fallen short of some plausible performance threshold".