Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

man4allcats

(4,026 posts)
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 01:47 PM Nov 2012

Nov. 2: For Romney to Win, State Polls Must Be Statistically Biased - By NATE SILVER

"...these arguments are potentially more intellectually coherent than the ones that propose that the race is “too close to call.” It isn’t. If the state polls are right, then Mr. Obama will win the Electoral College. If you can’t acknowledge that after a day when Mr. Obama leads 19 out of 20 swing-state polls, then you should abandon the pretense that your goal is to inform rather than entertain the public." Emphasis Mine - m4ac

Read the full article here.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nov. 2: For Romney to Win, State Polls Must Be Statistically Biased - By NATE SILVER (Original Post) man4allcats Nov 2012 OP
Not to worry. He's wearing those magic undies. Tutonic Nov 2012 #1
Its about time we abandon the idea that the main stream media has iemitsu Nov 2012 #2
I must say I find it disconcerting... regnaD kciN Nov 2012 #3
I think its certainly not something to be completely discounted onenote Nov 2012 #4

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
2. Its about time we abandon the idea that the main stream media has
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 01:54 PM
Nov 2012

any intent to acurately inform Americans about anything. They are propaganda outlets that put Tass and Pravda to shame.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
3. I must say I find it disconcerting...
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 03:54 PM
Nov 2012

...that Nate would think that there is around a 1-in-6 chance that the aggregate polling has a bias of a couple of points or more in Obama's favor, enough to change the outcome of the election. Really?



onenote

(42,585 posts)
4. I think its certainly not something to be completely discounted
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 04:09 PM
Nov 2012

I am optimistic, but not prepared to celebrate yet. There are a number of indicators, some more subjective than others, that give me pause. They include the fact that in several states, the repubs have closed the gap in early voting as compared to 2008 (i.e., there are more early votes being cast in repub leaning districts than in 2008 and/or fewer early votes being cast in Democratic leaning areas). But it is impossible to predict with any certainty what this change portends. There also is the utterly subjective evidence in my community, which was overwhelmingly pro-Obama in 2008 (my precinct supported Obama over McCain by a 36 point margin) I am seeing at least as many, if not more yard signs for Romney as for Obama. While I know that the campaign hasn't put as much emphasis on yard signs, it still makes me uneasy.

But I've cast my ballot, urged others to do the same and now must await the outcome, fingers crossed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nov. 2: For Romney to Win...