General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Low Would Pay Go If Minimum Wage Law Were To Be Abolished Like The GOP Wants?
FightForMichigan
(232 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Slaves are expensive to keep. Better to have a disposable labor force. I should think $1/hour would be a good round figure, at least in climates where you can sleep under the bridge all year. That would be $16 a day, 6 days a week. No point in being greedy--let 'em have Sundays off if they can document that they go to a good Fundie church.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)As long as you don't mind living in an alleyway, wearing the same clothes all the time, and eating from the dollar menu at McDonalds.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That would be a "good" employer...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Can't have 'em passing out on the job--then two others will have to stop their work to toss the fainter to the side.
Of course, the cheese sandwich would be made from Welfare Cheese, purchased from rMoney government larders, at a steep discount! It would also serve to "bind up" the workers (see? Not just women can do that "binding" thing!) so they wouldn't be taking too many poop breaks that would slow them from their labors. They can poop on their own time!!!
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)My definition would permit any harmless contaminants, where "harmless" is defined as "not likely to kill or seriously sicken the worker within the time period during which he/she is still useful to the company." On average, under the system I propose, I expect that workers will be useful for about 3 years before they need replacement from the Unemployed pool.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)But take it out of their paycheck.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)A--Depends.
liberal N proud
(60,289 posts)Think China or India.
The jobs would come back, but standard of living would drop like a rock.
geardaddy
(24,923 posts)shanti
(21,668 posts)used to hire lots of people for day labor and the pay was $40 per day. not sure if that was before or after taxes. that would be about $5 an hour. people fought for those jobs too, and they were backbreaking. even these kinds of jobs have fallen off the radar now though...
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)I think that gives us an idea of what it would look like.
Sgent
(5,856 posts)I used to be a waiter / bartender. Although we get paid $2.13, the minimum wage is actually the same as for anyone else -- if we do not make the difference in tips over the course of a week, the restaurant must pay the difference.
At my restaurant at least, the first time they had to do that you'd be retrained, the second time you'd be fired. I actually was ok with this, as even when I was working the small sections as a new waiter I made much more -- someone who couldn't make the minimum wage was having issues serving customers.
AlexSatan
(535 posts)If the employer is not abiding by the law, the employer should be reported.
What is the minimum wage for workers who receive tips?
An employer may pay a tipped employee not less than $2.13 an hour in direct wages if that amount plus the tips received equal at least the federal minimum wage, the employee retains all tips and the employee customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips. If an employee's tips combined with the employer's direct wages of at least $2.13 an hour do not equal the federal minimum hourly wage, the employer must make up the difference.
http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/q-a.htm#.UI_5GHU5zng
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)The employer should pay the base wage. The patron's tip should be purely a reward for good service and tolerating the MF'ing public. The only reason this paternalistic bull is allowed to continue is the majority of waitstaff in the nation are still female and poor, vulnerable with little power by definition.
standingtall
(2,785 posts)That system is nothing more than wage theft made legal. A tip should be considered a gift not a wage, and nor should tips be taxed.
AlexSatan
(535 posts)I hate it that my waitstaff often has to split it with the hostess, bar and others. Pay them a base wage and let my tip go to the person who earned it.
That's why I usually tip 10% on the credit card and the rest in cash.
theKed
(1,235 posts)The host/hostess serves a vital function, seating guests in sections at a controlled pace so each server is able to properly serve the tables they have, keeping track of reservations, and so on.
The bartender makes all the drinks for that server and all the other servers, so that they aren't tripping over each other making their own drinks (and slowing down service to everybody in the process)
The bussers clear the tables for the servers, so they are able to direct more of their time to giving you the best dining experience, and allowing you to get a table more quickly.
The kitchen (if it's a restaurant that tips out the kitchen staff - not all do) aren't taking it easy back there. They're cooking for lots of people, in a gruelling environment, and getting your food out quickly and to the table hot.
Even the managers might qualify for some of that tip. They coordinate all those different aspects of the restaurant labour and smooth over any difficulties during the service.
Each and every one of those people contributes to your dinner experience. Should you just tip the face that shows up at your table? Why just them, because they smiled and said "have a nice night"? Is it because those others "make more money"? The bussers, host(esses), and bartenders sure don't. And when you include those tips into their take-home, servers are often the best paid person in the restaurant...if they aren't, they are probably not very good at their job (or should look into working at a restaurant that gets customers through the door)
AlexSatan
(535 posts)It is pretty hard for a hostess to screw up from a diners perspective. Sure, from a management perspective it matters, but not from mine (as a diner). Having him/her chat me up as I walk to a table does nothing for my experience.
At many of the places we go, the servers have a second station for drinks. Those who get alcohol are perfectly capable of tipping the person who makes their drinks.
As with the hostess, the bussers have an impact on the functioning of the restaurant (and should have a set wage) and do not impact my dining experience. If the wait is going to be too long (due to poor bussing) we leaveagain the managements problem.
For the kitchen staff, I dont know of any place that does tip them out. However, I have specifically tipped the kitchen staff before.
The waitstaff by far has the most impact on my mealrefilling drinks, replacing bread/rolls, ensuring the order is right. The kitchen is the second in impacting my meal. The rest have almost no impact.
Using your logic, your newspaper carrier should be tipping out to everyone who prints, writes or drives the truck to deliver the papers to central locations.
theKed
(1,235 posts)So when the hostess screws up and seats 5 tables in Sever A's section within 10 minutes of each other, causing the server to not be able to quickly come take your drink order, that doesn't impact your dinner? When they don't have time to refill your bread because they're running food and drinks to all the other tables that sat and ordered at the same time, that doesn't affect your dinner experience?
When you have to wait 10 minutes longer because there's no busser to clear the table, or they aren't quick enough, that doesn't affect your dinner experience?
The functioning of the restaurant IS your dining experience. To think otherwise is simply foolish.
The server is often the least impactful on your total dining experience. They are the smiling, chirpy mask on top of all the other things going on behind the scenes in the restaurant.
AlexSatan
(535 posts)It can affect my dinner, but if I see the server is busting his/her ass because they oversat her, Im not going to take it out on him/her.
I will mention it to management and, if it is a regular occurrence, go somewhere else from then on. Again, that is a management problem.
If I have to wait too long, I go somewhere elsemanagements problem.
Usually there are multiple hostesses. If ones screws up, should the waitstaff and other hostesses be punished? If there is only one and he/she screws up but the waitstaff compensates, should he/she be rewarded? Nope and Nope.
And thanks, but you have no clue what impacts my dining experience and what I value. We go through a lot of drinks (4-5 each) and bread and we tip knowing we are somewhat high maintenance. The biggest factor on our experience is whether the drinks are kept refilled. I realize it is hard to cook a meal, especially steak, perfectly (which I what I am avoiding when going out to eat), so I cut them some slack.
The hostess and bus job never changeseat people as table comes open and clear dishes. The waitstaff, on the other hand, have to deal with personalities, complex orders, and differing needs of patrons.
And no, I am not biased because I was or ever have been waitstaff-- I havent.
theKed
(1,235 posts)that you have no restaurant experience. You only have a surface understanding of that part that directly interacts with you.
However, as someone that's worked in the industry in a lot of different places, and a lot of types of restaurants, you are really ignorant of how these things operate. And yes, as a ridiculously overqualified member of the trade, I do have something of an idea what you value and what impacts your dining experience...it's my job to know those things.
When the server tips out the host(ess)/bartender/kitchen/busser/etc, it's not you tipping them. It's the server tipping them for making their job easier. They tip the busser so that the busser moves quickly clearing their section, so the server can get more tables in. They tip out the kitchen for making their food properly and promptly, helping ensure a positive reaction from the customer (and a better tip at the end). And so on. Their tipout doesn't even come from the tips directly. The vast, vast, vast majority of establishments take tipouts as a (tiny) percentage of overall sales and redistribute it to others.
On the other hand, if the servers are pooling their tips between themselves and splitting them up after the shift, I don't necessarily agree to that. But, that's an oddity for the most part, especially the higher up the restaurant foodchain you go.
AlexSatan
(535 posts)If it was optional (as tipping is for the patrons) for the server to tip out to the others, then you might have a point. But since it is a set, mandatory percentage, it is not tip.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And dorms near the factory so the workers can get up on command. Remember Steve Jobs saying how great that was?
Mitt was practically salivating in that 47% tape about having workers who were so eager to get the jobs, they were lined up outside, waiting for someone to quit (having saved up enough to go back to the village and get married, for the girls.)
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)We have perfectly good bridges, doorways & heating grates in this country.
China is a liberal nanny-state.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)It would be far less for women.
vinny9698
(1,016 posts)The city of Galveston is hurting for low income workers. Hurricane Ike destroyed low income government housing. The city officials want the federal dollars but do not want to spend it on low income housing. The city is a tourist attraction, so most of the jobs are part-time minimum wage jobs Housemaids, restaurants, gift shops, are the major employers. Now to drive from Texas City which is the closest town about 20 miles away it is not practically because the gas alone makes it not worthwhile to work.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)without the costs of keeping the slaves healthy enough to work.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)There they would round Indians to do the farm work during the planting and harvesting, then set them free the rest of the year because they didn't want to feed them.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)All the better for those who measure their personal worth in terms of the differences between themselves & everyone else. The rich do just fine in countries with crashed economies.
swayne
(383 posts)NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)there's no promise you'll ever be hired on, you can be fired at will, and you have to pay all your expenses.
so, you're exactly right, they'll always want it worse.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)thecrow
(5,519 posts)Indentured service.... then they will work toward being released.
begin_within
(21,551 posts)Initech
(99,881 posts)eShirl
(18,462 posts)debt collection and temp employment will merge and "let" you work off your debt by selling your labor as a temp worker. you will live in a dorm and eat cafeteria slop.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)an hour 10 years ago.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/10/29/the-revival-of-american-manufacturing-but-the-jobs-still-arent-coming-back/
This is happening just as other clusters of manufacturing machinery, electrical products, transport equipment, furniture, etc are re-shoring back from from China to the US. A 16% annual rise in Chinese wages over the last decade has changed the game.
It is true that this re-shoring is happening. But again theres not all that much extra employment that is going to come from it. And the secret to that is in that Chinese wages number. Those wages have indeed risen by 16% a year for a decade: and two years ago we could have said by 14% since the millennium. But just 16% per year for a decade means they have risen over 4 times. Yes, really, Chinese manufacturing wages are over four times what they were only ten years ago. This is quite probably the fastest and largest rise in general wages in the history of our entire species. The thing is, such Chinese manufacturing wages are still only in the $6,000 to $7,000 a year range. Much better than they were but still nowhere near as high as those in the US.
Which is where our problem comes in for the US job count. Because China is also losing manufacturing jobs. No, not just those being re-shored. Theyre losing many more than that. And theyre losing them to machines. Take Apples fabricator, Foxconn, theyve just over 1 million people working for them at present. And theyve announced plans to install 1 million robots over the next three years. Even at a cost per worker of $6,000 a year it seems that it is cheaper to use a robot, a machine, than a person. And as we can all note, a US employee costs rather more than $6,000 a year in wages. So there most certainly wont be a mass flood of jobs from China to the US. Just as there isnt a massive expansion of jobs from those natural gas prices.
Simply because in most of manufacturing it is now cheaper to buy a machine than it is to hire a worker.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,314 posts)durablend
(7,402 posts)"There's 168 hours in a week YOU LEECH! GET TO WORK YOU LAZY DEADBEAT!!!!!!"
durablend
(7,402 posts)Either way they'll make money off of your existence.
NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)regular slavery is just too expensive an alternative. by rights of property laws you are expect to somewhat have to care for those slaves.
wage slaves owe YOU money, and you don't have to care if they live or die. they're not your property, so you have zero responsibility.
we've done this before in history. anyone remember the saying, "when sheep ate men" or ideas of the company store? yeah, that.
MountainLaurel
(10,271 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)they have to be paid the same. So I assume $1 an hour or whatever Chinese workers get. Plus no workplace protection.