Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:38 PM Jan 2012

So, bottom line, did Santorum's wife have an abortion or not?

By "abortion," I mean an induced abortion to protect the mother's health, not a spontaneous abortion as a result of infection.

I've seen this reported both ways--it was induced or it was spontaneous. If it were the former, Santorum is a massive hypocrite and should be derided for it. If it were the latter, it's a tragedy and the family is deserving only of sympathy on this matter.

Has anyone proven this one way or the other?

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, bottom line, did Santorum's wife have an abortion or not? (Original Post) mistertrickster Jan 2012 OP
I don't know, I don't care, and it's none of my business Demeter Jan 2012 #1
Generally, I'd agree. But doesn't Santorum's hard-line make this an issue? nt mistertrickster Jan 2012 #2
No Demeter Jan 2012 #13
He "respected her decision" not to have one. But he won't let you make your own decision. SharonAnn Jan 2012 #35
According to the following Salon.com article justiceischeap Jan 2012 #3
Yup, I saw that too. mistertrickster Jan 2012 #7
I agree that he's opened his family up to this scrutiny justiceischeap Jan 2012 #24
I heard that she lived with an abortionist, roguevalley Jan 2012 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Erose999 Jan 2012 #4
article from 1997 mzteris Jan 2012 #5
Very good . . . it was spontaneous and doesn't exactly conflict with Santorum's position mistertrickster Jan 2012 #12
this, of course, is the same santorum who says that women who have been raped have no need for an niyad Jan 2012 #33
Shakes head--he's stuck on stupid . . . nt mistertrickster Jan 2012 #34
This personal anecdote proves how private is the issue and why it needs to remain a legal option Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #6
Which is exactly what Santorum won't allow FOR OTHERS. nt mistertrickster Jan 2012 #8
well, he is a dumbass and that proves this. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #9
I thought I read somewhere that she was given oxicontin to induce labor... jorno67 Jan 2012 #10
No, no, no, you've got it all wrong. Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #18
Hadn't heard that but it would be the hormone, oxytocin not the pain killer oxycontin. TexasProgresive Jan 2012 #22
yep...you're right! jorno67 Jan 2012 #23
It's private unless she makes it public The Second Stone Jan 2012 #11
I have to disagree with that. It's a double standard. mistertrickster Jan 2012 #14
Sorry but they have publicized this...she wrote a book and included this story... rfranklin Jan 2012 #15
I'm not sure about proof, redqueen Jan 2012 #16
I agree with the Salon article. DU'er, lapislzi summed it up best here: FSogol Jan 2012 #17
I agree. redqueen Jan 2012 #20
Only sourcing I've seen for Pitocin administration was a 2005 article. moriah Jan 2012 #19
From what I have read, I'm sure the massive infection she had HappyMe Jan 2012 #21
according to this interview she did mercuryblues Jan 2012 #25
Anyone able to find the actual transcript/video of the 2004 interview? moriah Jan 2012 #26
from one of the first articles written about it: mzteris Jan 2012 #36
Found the interview. No mention of Pitocin or induction in the interview. moriah Jan 2012 #27
I just listened mercuryblues Jan 2012 #29
The anti-choice site was quoting Jezebel, who said it. moriah Jan 2012 #30
from the NYT mercuryblues Jan 2012 #31
Wow . . . a lot of conflicting evidence here . . . mistertrickster Jan 2012 #32
That's the 2005 article I mentioned. But what sourcing other than the book for the statement? moriah Jan 2012 #37
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
13. No
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:55 PM
Jan 2012

The fact that he voices an opinion at all disqualifies him for any public office, IMO.

We the People have got to call these would-be "leaders" to heel.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
3. According to the following Salon.com article
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jan 2012
It is technically correct to say that Karen Santorum had a septic spontaneous abortion, but that’s a medical term for an involuntary event that is different from “induced abortion,” which describes a willful termination.

http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/karen_santorum_did_not_have_an_abortion/


If that's true, she had a miscarriage. However, the doctor interviewed for the above article said, without anyone seeing the medical records, there is no way to say if they're telling the truth about what happened.
 

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)
7. Yup, I saw that too.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jan 2012

Given that Santorum would like to expose other women to investigation of their medical files, shouldn't they be releasing theirs?

That would be one point where'd he be vulnerable.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
24. I agree that he's opened his family up to this scrutiny
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jan 2012

but as a woman that he wants to violate, I'm not a big proponent of making what should be private, family business something for public consumption. I know it reeks of hypocrisy but what's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
28. I heard that she lived with an abortionist,
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 04:39 PM
Jan 2012

may have had one with him and wasn't married. I also heard they both were okay with abortion until they got married and decided to become Mary and Joseph. Anyone corroborate that for me? I have heard it several times now.

Response to mistertrickster (Original post)

 

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)
12. Very good . . . it was spontaneous and doesn't exactly conflict with Santorum's position
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:53 PM
Jan 2012

QUOTE from link above

The Santorums, according to an account written by the senator for today's Commentary Page in The Inquirer, struggled mightily to avoid the abortion option.

Ultimately, they did not have to make a decision; nature made it for them. Karen went into premature labor from an infection, delivering a boy who had a fatal abnormality. The child died two hours later.

In an interview, the Santorums said they would have authorized an abortion had there been no other choice . . .

Santorum opposes abortion "except in the cases of rape, incest or [to save] the life of the mother.'' He believes Roe v. Wade should be reversed so that states could regulate and restrict abortion, and opposes public funding of abortion.

END QUOTE

So even if they had opted for induced labor/abortion, it wouldn't be contradictory to Santorum's stated position.

Of course, enforcing such a position will make patients less safe and their records less private.

niyad

(112,946 posts)
33. this, of course, is the same santorum who says that women who have been raped have no need for an
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 06:05 PM
Jan 2012

exception to his anti-abortion stance, because, according to this medical genius, women who have been raped excrete an enzyme that prevents pregnancy.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
6. This personal anecdote proves how private is the issue and why it needs to remain a legal option
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jan 2012

between a Doctor and the patient.

jorno67

(1,986 posts)
10. I thought I read somewhere that she was given oxicontin to induce labor...
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jan 2012

so at 20 weeks - that's a partial birth abortion, right?

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
18. No, no, no, you've got it all wrong.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:08 PM
Jan 2012

It wasn't a "partial birth abortion", it was an induced labor followed by a birth. Remember, these are Republicans: once you're out of the womb, you're on your own. The fact that that partially-formed fetus couldn't survive is nobody's fault but his own.

He should've gotten a job and pulled himself up by the bootstraps.

TexasProgresive

(12,153 posts)
22. Hadn't heard that but it would be the hormone, oxytocin not the pain killer oxycontin.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:32 PM
Jan 2012

The use of oxytocin does not always indicate inducing labor-see below

Uterine stimulants (uterotonics) are medications that cause, or increase the frequency and intensity of, uterine contractions. These drugs are used to induce (start) or augment (stimulate) labor, facilitate uterine contractions following a miscarriage, induce abortion, or reduce hemorrhage following childbirth or abortion.

http://www.enotes.com/uterine-stimulants-reference/uterine-stimulants-172503

jorno67

(1,986 posts)
23. yep...you're right!
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:34 PM
Jan 2012

That makes sense - my wife was given that for all 3 of our kids (over due).

Sorry for the confusion!

 

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)
14. I have to disagree with that. It's a double standard.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jan 2012

Santorum has be held to the standard he would impose on others.

 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
15. Sorry but they have publicized this...she wrote a book and included this story...
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jan 2012

there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

Gabriel was the couple's eighth pregnancy and he survived only two hours. In her book, Karen Santorum wrote about bringing the body home to their other children.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/rick-santorum-dead-baby-critics-lambasted-families-grieve/story?id=15306750

redqueen

(115,096 posts)
20. I agree.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:17 PM
Jan 2012

I read something that claimed she did in fact abort, and now I wish I hadn't taken it at face value.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
19. Only sourcing I've seen for Pitocin administration was a 2005 article.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jan 2012

Their statements in the years immediately following their child's death say they did not actually accept Pitocin.

The 2005 article claims they did but gives no source except their book about their son for the entire paragraph, and their book isn't available to be searched online through to find out if it was said in the book. I'm not about to go buy the thing.

-------

Regardless of if they're hypocrites or not, though, we don't have to be.

mercuryblues

(14,519 posts)
25. according to this interview she did
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:41 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/06/liberal-web-site-lies-claims-santorums-wife-had-abortion/


Karen Santorum’s difficult pregnancy and resultant life-saving, induced early delivery is no secret; in a 2004 interview with NPR’s Terry Gross, her husband characterized the 1996 procedure as a harrowing but necessary. Karen, in her 19th week of pregnancy, received a risky surgery to save a pregnancy that doctors thought had little chance of survival. After the surgery, she came down with an infection, and doctors told Rick that unless the source of the infection — the fetus — was removed, his wife would die and his already-born children would be motherless. The doctor also told Santorum that his wife’s fetus would not survive outside of the womb. According to Santorum, Karen went into labor as a result of the antibiotics, and then doctors gave her a drug that further induced labor. She delivered, and unfortunately the doctors were right.


As soon as they gave her the meds to speed up the labor, she went from having a spontaneous abortion to having a therapudic abortion. A choice he will deny every other woman in the country, if he has his way.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
26. Anyone able to find the actual transcript/video of the 2004 interview?
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 04:09 PM
Jan 2012

Given the fact that all obstetric emergencies are extremely complicated, I'd rather see his exact words than a 3rd-hand paraphrase.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
36. from one of the first articles written about it:
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 06:37 PM
Jan 2012

May 4, 1997

Karen was in her 19th week of pregnancy . . . the fetus Karen was carrying had a fatal defect and was going to die.

. . .the Santorums decided on long-shot intrauterine surgery to correct an obstruction of the urinary tract called posterior urethral valve syndrome. . . . The incision in the womb carried a high risk of infection.

Two days later, at home in the Pittsburgh suburb of Verona, Karen Santorum became feverish. . . . unless the source of the infection, the fetus, was removed from Karen's body, she would likely die.

At minimum, the doctor said, Karen had to be given antibiotics intravenously or she might go into septic shock and die.

. . . Once they agreed to use antibiotics, they believed they were committing to delivery of the fetus, which they knew would most likely not survive outside the womb.

. . . Santorum agreed to start his wife on intravenous antibiotics ``to buy her some time,'' he said.



Their volitional actions directly resulted in a premature birth causing the baby to die. Sounds like an abortion to me.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
30. The anti-choice site was quoting Jezebel, who said it.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 05:23 PM
Jan 2012

It's all a huge mess of he-said she-said... meh....

mercuryblues

(14,519 posts)
31. from the NYT
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 05:33 PM
Jan 2012

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/22/magazine/22SANTORUM.html?ei=5088&en=83d72ed75fbada1d&ex=1274414400&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all


The childbirth in 1996 was a source of terrible heartbreak -- the couple were told by doctors early in the pregnancy that the baby Karen was carrying had a fatal defect and would survive only for a short time outside the womb. According to Karen Santorum's book, ''Letters to Gabriel: The True Story of Gabriel Michael Santorum,'' she later developed a life-threatening intrauterine infection and a fever that reached nearly 105 degrees. She went into labor when she was 20 weeks pregnant. After resisting at first, she allowed doctors to give her the drug Pitocin to speed the birth. Gabriel lived just two hours.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
37. That's the 2005 article I mentioned. But what sourcing other than the book for the statement?
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jan 2012

I'm not about to go buy the book.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, bottom line, did Sant...