Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:04 PM

markpkessinger (3,121 posts)

Some friends and I had fun with this on Facebook . . .

12 replies, 798 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

12 replies	Author	Time	Post
Some friends and I had fun with this on Facebook . . . (Original post)	markpkessinger	Oct 2012	OP
Funny! n/t	Fridays Child	Oct 2012	#1
Your eyes must be a helluva	ohheckyeah	Oct 2012	#6
ha ha, I can't see it either.	hollysmom	Oct 2012	#7
I couldn't have seen that when I was 18. :-)	ohheckyeah	Oct 2012	#9
me, too, been wearing glasses for the last year when I noticed I was missing things others saw.	hollysmom	Oct 2012	#10
I've been wearing contacts or glasses since I was 13	ohheckyeah	Oct 2012	#11
This message was hidden by jury decision.	Dan Daly	Oct 2012	#2
No one ever claimed they were obsolete. Just that there are fewer of them in use today.	Indpndnt	Oct 2012	#5
Thanks for the info	.99center	Oct 2012	#8
Were in serious trouble	.99center	Oct 2012	#3
Very funny	Dman292	Oct 2012	#4
ha!	IVoteDFL	Oct 2012	#12

Response to markpkessinger (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:07 PM

Fridays Child (23,514 posts)

1. Funny! n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Fridays Child (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:35 PM

ohheckyeah (5,829 posts)

6. Your eyes must be a helluva

a lot better than mine.

Reply to this post

Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #6)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:54 PM

hollysmom (1,277 posts)

7. ha ha, I can't see it either.

Reply to this post

Response to hollysmom (Reply #7)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:12 AM

ohheckyeah (5,829 posts)

9. I couldn't have seen that when I was 18. :-)

Reply to this post

Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #9)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:49 AM

hollysmom (1,277 posts)

10. me, too, been wearing glasses for the last year when I noticed I was missing things others saw.

Reply to this post

Response to hollysmom (Reply #10)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:56 AM

ohheckyeah (5,829 posts)

11. I've been wearing contacts or glasses since I was 13

for nearsightedness. Fortunately I don't need glasses for close up reading yet.

Reply to this post

Response to markpkessinger (Original post)

Dan Daly This message was hidden by Jury decision.

Response to Dan Daly (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:34 PM

Indpndnt (2,306 posts)

5. No one ever claimed they were obsolete. Just that there are fewer of them in use today.

Especially for their original, critical purposes in 1916. And it was nuclear subs mentioned by the President, not just subs.

But I guess comprehension isn't high on your list, right? Enjoy your brief stay.

Reply to this post

Response to Dan Daly (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:02 AM

.99center (140 posts)

8. Thanks for the info

It reinforces President Obama's point about wasteful spending in the military. Why the hell do we need 195,334 bayonets for 20,000-30,000 deployed Marines? I don't recall him saying they're obsolete, I must of missed the fox version of the debate. My damn lying ears and brain, if I didn't have Fox I wouldn't know which voice in my head I should listen to.

Reply to this post

Response to markpkessinger (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:23 PM

.99center (140 posts)