HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » What with this CNN Emails...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:23 PM

What with this CNN Emails business?

You would think that the President was about to be impeached if your are unfortunate enough to listen to Asshat Limbaugh today. What are they claiming they "have" on Obama regarding this Libya business?

10 replies, 816 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply What with this CNN Emails business? (Original post)
EnviroBat Oct 2012 OP
cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #1
EnviroBat Oct 2012 #4
Iwasthere Oct 2012 #2
dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #3
rightsideout Oct 2012 #5
justiceischeap Oct 2012 #6
Aerows Oct 2012 #7
Viking12 Oct 2012 #10
mainer Oct 2012 #8
siligut Oct 2012 #9

Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:24 PM

1. they are upset the WH made the right call

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cthulu2016 (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:28 PM

4. Ahhh, thanks for that.

Sounds like more RW desperation. Pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:26 PM

2. they have nothing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:26 PM

3. More accurately - What with this CNN Emails business

given that Reuters, Associated Press. Uncle Tom Cobley, Bill Brewer, Jan Stewer, Tom Pearse and his old grey mare have carried it too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:30 PM

5. I heard about this early on CNN today which seemed to want to make a big deal about it.

There were emails sent 2 hours after the attack from a militant group claiming responsibility and they are questioning why the emails are just now being known.

That's the gist I got from CNN which seems to want to keep pushing this. It's not a big surprise because alot of times there are claims for responsibility after an attack.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:30 PM

6. On twitter the righties are now saying

that President Obama lied so he could sell weapons to AQ. They're becoming (further) unhinged.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:33 PM

7. Since when

do administration officials talk about groups that claim responsibility for attacks without verifying the information? That seems far more reckless than trying to get the information straight before discussing it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aerows (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:53 PM

10. Egg Xactly!

Would you want the President to come on TV and use intelligence gathered from facebook and twitter?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:36 PM

8. weirdos often walk into police stations claiming "I'm the killer"

It doesn't mean the cops automatically believe them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EnviroBat (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:47 PM

9. You really listened to Limbaugh?

If you find yourself mocking homeless people and inciting zealots to violence, let me know. I am doing a study on the possibility that electromagnetic waves can be transmitted through HF FM receivers. Because there has to be a rational explanation of how listeners can not only believe his rants, but then repeat them word for word.

So, the emails say that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks. This is part of the continued coddling of Mitt's butthurt after he was corrected on national TV, by a woman, in front of 65 million viewers.

Anyway, the implication is that the president is weak on terror because he didn't yell and pound the podium the morning after in the rose garden. President Obama should have already sent ships to Benghazi to massacre the terrorists and show them who's boss by then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread