Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:13 PM
gabeana (1,478 posts)
I don't understand why Romney would double down on this
but more power to him
Mitt Romney's campaign confirmed that he still supports Richard Mourdock and has not asked Mourdock's campaign to pull the ad Romney made in support of his Senate candidacy http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-richard-mourdock_n_2007559.html
|
11 replies, 927 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| gabeana | Oct 2012 | OP | |
| tk2kewl | Oct 2012 | #1 | |
| madaboutharry | Oct 2012 | #2 | |
| democrat_patriot | Oct 2012 | #4 | |
| Flashmann | Oct 2012 | #3 | |
| ProSense | Oct 2012 | #5 | |
| rustydog | Oct 2012 | #6 | |
| TwilightGardener | Oct 2012 | #7 | |
| DefenseLawyer | Oct 2012 | #8 | |
| soleft | Oct 2012 | #9 | |
| WinTwins | Oct 2012 | #11 | |
| ProfessionalLeftist | Oct 2012 | #10 |
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:14 PM
madaboutharry (21,229 posts)
2. He wants the militant anti-choice vote.
Response to madaboutharry (Reply #2)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:16 PM
democrat_patriot (2,766 posts)
4. He can have it. The evangelical south is already his.
|
Was he worried if he bailed on Mourdock it would hurt him in Indiana? Even Pence walked away. |
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:16 PM
Flashmann (1,965 posts)
3. Nobody outside their bubble has yet
|
Told those inside that this might be a bad thing....Those inside the bubble,most especially willard himself,are incapable of reasoning through to this conclusion......
|
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:17 PM
ProSense (98,278 posts)
5. Romnesia
|
Give it another few hours, he'll say he didn't mean it
Mitt tries to distance himself from Mourdock's rape comment after starring http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021621280 |
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:21 PM
rustydog (8,103 posts)
6. Willard is rich. He is privileged, he hates being corrected
|
He hates being shown to be wrong by those lesser than him...
|
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:23 PM
TwilightGardener (39,683 posts)
7. Sheer political calculation. But I think that since Mittens stands by
|
his endorsement of a sick man who says God wants rape to happen, then we should make him OWN that endorsement.
|
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:26 PM
DefenseLawyer (8,399 posts)
8. It's simple. At this point they think Mourdock can still win. They think Akin can't.
|
The calculation begins and ends there.
|
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:28 PM
soleft (18,531 posts)
9. All hands on deck to minimize damage in Congress since Romney ship is going down
|
|
Response to soleft (Reply #9)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:58 PM
WinTwins (13 posts)
11. Correct (I think)
|
My working hypothesis is that Romney has already been told by his campaign that he lost. He knew he was at the brink of losing during the last debate, thus his flop sweat. The second debate was Romney's Hail-Mary pass. Pass incomplete. We was unable to sway the demographics he needed. Early voting, especially in key counties and districts, combined with the Obama's Mamouth GOTV efforts have closed Romney's Electoral College path. Everything we see from Romney is Kabuki theatre to maintain Republican enthusiasm. I believe the polls will reflect that in the next few days, and beginning to show Obama's momentum now. I don't believe Ohio will decide this race, only because the polls close in NC and Virginia first. Romney was never really ahead in this race beyond some opinion polls, and time has run out for him to catch up.
Stay scared and maybe we can get Congress, too. Cheers. |
Response to gabeana (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:54 PM
ProfessionalLeftist (4,982 posts)
10. Because the GOP does not consider women human
|
If you think about it, that attitude is behind many of these outrageous statements. Not at all acceptable but certainly explains it.
|

