Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:26 AM
FreeState (7,545 posts)
Ted Haggard says gay marriage “should be legal”Last edited Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:33 AM USA/ET - Edit history (3)
Interesting developement....
http://www.christianpost.com/news/ted-haggard-says-gay-marriage-not-biblical-but-should-be-legal-83710/ Colorado evangelical pastor Ted Haggard, who was involved in a sex and drug scandal six years ago, appears to have changed his earlier position against same-sex marriage. In an online debate, he said while biblical law is against homosexual marriage, the state should allow it.
|
22 replies, 1573 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| FreeState | Oct 2012 | OP | |
| JesterCS | Oct 2012 | #1 | |
| FreeState | Oct 2012 | #2 | |
| greyl | Oct 2012 | #3 | |
| FreeState | Oct 2012 | #4 | |
| greyl | Oct 2012 | #5 | |
| qkvhj | Oct 2012 | #6 | |
| FreeState | Oct 2012 | #9 | |
| Scootaloo | Oct 2012 | #11 | |
| qkvhj | Oct 2012 | #16 | |
| freshwest | Oct 2012 | #7 | |
| freshwest | Oct 2012 | #18 | |
| ljm2002 | Oct 2012 | #8 | |
| WCGreen | Oct 2012 | #10 | |
| FreeState | Oct 2012 | #14 | |
| WCGreen | Oct 2012 | #15 | |
| intaglio | Oct 2012 | #12 | |
| freshwest | Oct 2012 | #13 | |
| spanone | Oct 2012 | #17 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Oct 2012 | #19 | |
| David Zephyr | Oct 2012 | #20 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Oct 2012 | #21 | |
| libdem4life | Oct 2012 | #22 |
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:28 AM
JesterCS (928 posts)
1. the grammar in that snip is terrible =(
Response to JesterCS (Reply #1)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:29 AM
FreeState (7,545 posts)
2. Its a translation....
|
Last edited Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:30 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Not sure why but I couldn't find the article in English...
Edit: font one... adding it to the OP |
Response to JesterCS (Reply #1)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:30 AM
greyl (16,452 posts)
3. And, punctuation.
|
Damn near, unreadable.
|
Response to greyl (Reply #3)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:32 AM
FreeState (7,545 posts)
4. Fixed
|
(It was a translation... found an article in English
|
Response to FreeState (Reply #4)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:42 AM
greyl (16,452 posts)
5. Lol, that explains it. ;) nt
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:49 AM
qkvhj (57 posts)
6. Why is this even an issue
|
What two people want to do is their business. Don't we have other more important things to worry about and take care of.
Take care of the people, jobs, and figure out this healthcare mess. We do not have time to get stupid about gay marriage. |
Response to qkvhj (Reply #6)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:13 AM
FreeState (7,545 posts)
9. I wish the other side would see it that way
|
but for them its a money maker (or was) and brought out the bigot vote for them.
For those of us that are LGBT it is a huge issue, not being treated as an equal by your own government causes a lot of issues with jobs, taking care of your loved ones, and obtaining healthcare. |
Response to qkvhj (Reply #6)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:16 AM
Scootaloo (6,108 posts)
11. Acknowledging the common dignity of all humans who wish to express love is a pretty big priority
|
So yes, we do have time to "get stupid about gay marriage," because its legal status - or lack thereof - in our nation is a fucking embarassment in that regard.
Hard to argue for spending money to help people preserve their lives and dignity when our government doesn't even allow two people to legally become a family on their own damn dime, based on the shape of their genitals. |
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #11)
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 06:49 PM
qkvhj (57 posts)
16. Us as a people.
|
Not those of us who support Gay marriage. Us as in the citizens of this country. The problems we face are faced by the vast majority of our people not just those with a D in front of their name. We are not making an issue out of this the latest interpretations of our constitution say we are right. It is the religious right who are wasting the time and treasure of our nation with this stupidity.
|
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:55 AM
freshwest (32,410 posts)
7. It's interesting. I found it good that he was able to say this:
|
"We've reached a point where human dignity and mutual respect is so important..."
I think he got the point. That's rational and what humanity wants and needs to survive. Thanks for posting this. I know someone who I was surprised to hear is conflicted on voting for same-sex marriage. I am going to show her this, and also this: |
Response to freshwest (Reply #7)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 05:49 PM
freshwest (32,410 posts)
18. We had a long talk and she was struck by the pastor saying to be against hate and division.
|
Last edited Sun Oct 28, 2012, 05:57 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) She hadn't heard abourt Haggard, but he made the case well. We went over every objection in the pamphlet, which were wrong, as the measure does not force churches to do anything, the measure guarantees that no one's rights will be taken away.
Also, there is the provision about people over 62 and domestic partnerships. And we discussed the problems they faced, and the problems of people not being allowed to be with their loved ones in the hospital or have property rights. I went over the case of the man in California who was evicted from his home after his partner broke his hip and had to go to the hospital and all the tragedy and injustice of that. So, I managed to get 5 votes on the ballot measure for same-sex marriage yesterday. I think it will pass. It feels good. |
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:07 AM
ljm2002 (7,461 posts)
8. That is surprising...
|
...and he does seem to get the point: the state has obligations towards all of its citizens, that may not agree with church doctrine. Good for him. (I never thought I'd say that...)
|
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:13 AM
WCGreen (45,058 posts)
10. I am surprised that Ted Haggard came out for Gay Marriage, especially with his
|
justification that a marriage is basically a contract and you can choose to have a "god" sanctioned rite or a secular joining for legal purposes.
|
Response to WCGreen (Reply #10)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:09 PM
FreeState (7,545 posts)
14. Haggard has always been on the forefront of LGBT rights in the born again movement
|
Haggard has always been on the forefront of LGBT rights in the born again movement, that not to say he has ever been working for them. However, if you look at his past statements with a comparison of what others in his movement were say at the same time, he seems to be pro-gay in comparison.
|
Response to FreeState (Reply #14)
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:50 AM
WCGreen (45,058 posts)
15. I really don't care how anyone worships whatever higher power they gravitate toward...
|
I just don't want them to try and tell me that I have to worship in their way of looking. To me, that is exactly why we were fighting the Taliban..
|
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 03:34 AM
intaglio (4,745 posts)
12. It seems Mr Haggard is recovering from hypocrisy
|
Good for him
|
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 07:45 PM
freshwest (32,410 posts)
13. The separation of church and state is the sane choice.
|
Let people believe whatever they want, so long as they don't enforce that on others in such intimate matters, but leave each person to decide. That is the only just way to go about these issues.
|
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 06:50 PM
spanone (72,281 posts)
17. i fart in his general direction.
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 05:53 PM
Honeycombe8 (18,266 posts)
19. Does anyone really care what that guy thinks or says? nt
Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #19)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 05:56 PM
David Zephyr (22,585 posts)
20. As an activist for LGBTQ issues since the 1960's, I appreciate your sentiments.
|
While I was in the trenches, living day by day to exist and fighting for my community, this sack of shit was killing my community and benefitting from doing so financially.
Honeycombe8, you sum up my feelings. He needs to work on his own conscience in private, not public. |
Response to David Zephyr (Reply #20)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 05:59 PM
Honeycombe8 (18,266 posts)
21. Exactly. He betrayed so many people. It's a little late for him to be conscience-driven. nt
Response to FreeState (Original post)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 06:12 PM
libdem4life (1,783 posts)
22. I'm glad he got back into the RWCF circuit for his family's sake, but he was forced to disavow
|
his own homosexuality and egregious hypocrisy after his own gay affair. As I recall, he admitted it was his human failure rather than a gift given at birth and they let him back in.
Biblical Law is used here as Old Testament Mosaic, Levitical Law and also demands stoning your children and killing animals for sacrifice and casting out your wife and a whole host of horrors. No where does any of it belong in Christ's family. So, I give it a 50% for LGBT rights. |

