Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWTF !!! - 'NYT Public Editor Criticized for “Truth Vigilante” Column' - FDL
NYT Public Editor Criticized for Truth Vigilante ColumnBy: David Dayen - FDL
Thursday January 12, 2012 12:59 pm
<snip>
Thrill to the exploits of New York Times Public Editor Arthur Brisbane, aka Truth Vigilante! Watch him wonder if its worth it to leap tall buildings in a single bound! Witness him ask around to see if he should run faster than a locomotive!
"Im looking for reader input on whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge facts that are asserted by newsmakers they write about."
Thats the lead paragraph, folks. Arthur Brisbane has to ask readers if reporters should call bullshit on politicians and public officials. Truth is apparently no longer a normal part of the job description for journalists, but an optional extra that the New York Times may or may not choose to install, depending on reader feedback. If reporters were not supposed to challenge the assertions of the subjects of their reporting, you could actually fire them all and hire some low-cost court stenographers to do the work.
The examples cited by Brisbane are all instances where any self-respecting writer would contextualize and analyze the CYA quotes they got before typing them up. But to Brisbane, this is a question of real mystery. A lot of news outlets get around this these days by having a separate fact-check column. But needless to say, if the lies arent called out right in the article, they never get fully challenged.
Amazingly, Jim Romenesko sought further comment from Brisbane, and he still didnt get the fuss his column generated: <cont'd.>
<snip>
More: http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/01/12/nyt-public-editor-criticized-for-truth-vigilante-column/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1188 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF !!! - 'NYT Public Editor Criticized for “Truth Vigilante” Column' - FDL (Original Post)
WillyT
Jan 2012
OP
valerief
(53,235 posts)1. Actual journalism is optional. Media is a propaganda delivery system today. nt
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)2. Of course they should challenge what people say
Very sad that anyone needs to ask.
DBoon
(22,340 posts)3. "fire them all and hire some low-cost court stenographers"
Isn't this what the last 20 years of shrinking the news business was all about?