HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » The New Yorker's endorsem...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:27 AM

The New Yorker's endorsement of Obama for president...

...is an absolute tour de force.

Best thing I've read so far in the campaign.

The Choice
by The Editors October 29, 2012

(snip)

Barack Obama began his Presidency devoted to the idea of post-partisanship. His rhetoric, starting with his “Red State, Blue State” Convention speech, in 2004, and his 2006 book, “The Audacity of Hope,” was imbued with that idea. Just as in his memoir, “Dreams from My Father,” he had tried to reconcile the disparate pasts of his parents, Obama was determined to bring together warring tribes in Washington and beyond. He extended his hand to everyone from the increasingly radical leadership of the congressional Republicans to the ruling mullahs of the Iranian theocracy. The Republicans, however, showed no greater interest in working with Obama than did the ayatollahs. The Iranian regime went on enriching uranium and crushing its opposition, and the Republicans, led by Dickensian scolds, including the Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, committed themselves to a single goal: to engineer the President’s political destruction by defeating his major initiatives. Obama, for his part, did not always prove particularly adept at, or engaged by, the arts of retail persuasion, and his dream of bipartisanship collided with the reality of obstructionism.

Perhaps inevitably, the President has disappointed some of his most ardent supporters. Part of their disappointment is a reflection of the fantastical expectations that attached to him. Some, quite reasonably, are disappointed in his policy failures (on Guantánamo, climate change, and gun control); others question the morality of the persistent use of predator drones. And, of course, 2012 offers nothing like the ecstasy of taking part in a historical advance: the reëlection of the first African-American President does not inspire the same level of communal pride. But the reëlection of a President who has been progressive, competent, rational, decent, and, at times, visionary is a serious matter. The President has achieved a run of ambitious legislative, social, and foreign-policy successes that relieved a large measure of the human suffering and national shame inflicted by the Bush Administration. Obama has renewed the honor of the office he holds.

(snip)

In the service of that ambition, Romney has embraced the values and the priorities of a Republican Party that has grown increasingly reactionary and rigid in its social vision. It is a party dominated by those who despise government and see no value in public efforts aimed at ameliorating the immense and rapidly increasing inequalities in American society. A visitor to the F.D.R. Memorial, in Washington, is confronted by these words from Roosevelt’s second Inaugural Address, etched in stone: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide for those who have too little.” Romney and the leaders of the contemporary G.O.P. would consider this a call to class warfare. Their effort to disenfranchise poor, black, Hispanic, and student voters in many states deepens the impression that Romney’s remarks about the “forty-seven per cent” were a matter not of “inelegant” expression, as he later protested, but of genuine conviction.

(snip)

The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; we also see in him what is absent in Mitt Romney—a first-rate political temperament and a deep sense of fairness and integrity. A two-term Obama Administration will leave an enduringly positive imprint on political life. It will bolster the ideal of good governance and a social vision that tempers individualism with a concern for community. Every Presidential election involves a contest over the idea of America. Obama’s America—one that progresses, however falteringly, toward social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves.

Read the whole thing: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors

7 replies, 1055 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply The New Yorker's endorsement of Obama for president... (Original post)
WilliamPitt Oct 2012 OP
RiffRandell Oct 2012 #1
JackN415 Oct 2012 #2
WilliamPitt Oct 2012 #3
greytdemocrat Oct 2012 #4
Raster Oct 2012 #5
Indykatie Oct 2012 #6
WilliamPitt Oct 2012 #7

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:36 AM

1. Last two sentences sum it up perfectly. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:39 AM

2. good preaching to the choir. what kind of people reading NewYorker? (hint: not Romney voters :) n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JackN415 (Reply #2)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:42 AM

3. ...and why do we preach to the choir?

Because that's how you get them to sing.

Turnout matters, Jack-o.

In this contest, it's the whole ballgame.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:45 AM

4. Well written. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:47 AM

5. Hear! Hear! or should I say: Read! Read! Fine endorsement.

The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; we also see in him what is absent in Mitt Romney—a first-rate political temperament and a deep sense of fairness and integrity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raster (Reply #5)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 09:42 AM

6. Excellent Endorsement

Some in the "choir", even here at DU, need preaching to from time to time so thanks for posting this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 01:29 PM

7. Up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread