General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust when I thought Romney could not sink any lower,greed and hypocrisy on steroids
We turn now to a major new exposé on the cover of The Nation magazine called, "Mitt Romneys Bailout Bonanza: How He Made Millions From The Rescue of Detroit." Investigative reporter Greg Palast reveals how Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney made some $15 million on the auto bailout and that three of Romneys top donors made more than $4 billion for their hedge funds from the bailout. Palasts report is part of a film-in-progress called, "Romneys Bailout Bonanza." Palast is the author of several books, including recently released New York Times best seller, "Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal An Election in 9 Easy Steps.
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/18/greg_palast_mitt_romneys_bailout_bonanza
begin_within
(21,551 posts)"And one thing that the the president said which I want to make sure that we understand he he said that I said we should take Detroit bankrupt, and and thats right. My plan was to have the company go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macys and and and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And and I know he keeps saying, you wanted to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did. And and I think its important to know that that was a process that was necessary to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommend and ultimately what happened."
AnnaLee
(1,033 posts)I recall that I once moved my money out of equities just before a major crash. I could have told my fellow workers that I planned it that way and no one would have questioned that it was unlikely that I knew more than professional investors.
The relevance is that if the American people allow candidates to develop "My plan" after the fact, then they can claim that any success the President had with his plan was due to the part that was what "my plan" would have been had I expressed it fully.
So we have - the bankruptcy part would have worked without the bailout which is what I call the path not taken which is unknowable. Somehow the ditz want to take credit for Obama's accomplishments and say Obama's a failure because I woulda given it to you as a "free lunch".
Reagan proved that the "free lunch" argument always wins and people never learn when a free lunch is involved. For example, I get the impression that tea party seniors actually believe they will be able to get all of promised Social Security for the remainder of their lives (20-30 years for some) if there are no new contributions to the fund. Wait until they discover that "for you, things will not change" means that the dollar value of SS they get this minute will never go up and not that the amount promised will be delivered. (Note the latter is my interpretation based on the fact that the words used never change and the literal interpretation is - won't change. If I'm right, it is another after the fact, got ya, thing.)
Response to begin_within (Reply #1)
Post removed
EOTE
(13,409 posts)I never thought I'd meet one of those outside of a LaRouche rally. Do you think I can pet it, ma?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,523 posts)EOTE
(13,409 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,523 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)Thanks, Cal Peggy!!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,523 posts)I guess I must miss being on MIRT, at least a little bit, LOL!