Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joelz

(185 posts)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:08 AM Oct 2012

Just when I thought Romney could not sink any lower,greed and hypocrisy on steroids

We turn now to a major new exposé on the cover of The Nation magazine called, "Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza: How He Made Millions From The Rescue of Detroit." Investigative reporter Greg Palast reveals how Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney made some $15 million on the auto bailout and that three of Romney’s top donors made more than $4 billion for their hedge funds from the bailout. Palast’s report is part of a film-in-progress called, "Romney’s Bailout Bonanza." Palast is the author of several books, including recently released New York Times best seller, "Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal An Election in 9 Easy Steps.

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/18/greg_palast_mitt_romneys_bailout_bonanza

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just when I thought Romney could not sink any lower,greed and hypocrisy on steroids (Original Post) joelz Oct 2012 OP
And yet he said in the debate... begin_within Oct 2012 #1
I wonder if anyone thinks when they hear this AnnaLee Oct 2012 #2
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #3
Ahhh, a zionist Rothschild conspiracy theorist live and in the flesh. EOTE Oct 2012 #4
LOL DURHAM D Oct 2012 #5
It should be gone soon.......so if you want to pet it, do it now! CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2012 #6
Much thanks :) nt EOTE Oct 2012 #10
It's gone! Here's the profile: CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2012 #7
That was a quick turn-around on the alert and the PPR!! madinmaryland Oct 2012 #8
My pleasure, my dear madinmaryland! CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2012 #9
 

begin_within

(21,551 posts)
1. And yet he said in the debate...
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:12 AM
Oct 2012

"And one thing that the — the president said which I want to make sure that we understand — he — he said that I said we should take Detroit bankrupt, and — and that’s right. My plan was to have the company go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and — and — and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And — and I know he keeps saying, you wanted to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did. And — and I think it’s important to know that that was a process that was necessary to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommend and ultimately what happened."

AnnaLee

(1,033 posts)
2. I wonder if anyone thinks when they hear this
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 11:46 AM
Oct 2012

I recall that I once moved my money out of equities just before a major crash. I could have told my fellow workers that I planned it that way and no one would have questioned that it was unlikely that I knew more than professional investors.

The relevance is that if the American people allow candidates to develop "My plan" after the fact, then they can claim that any success the President had with his plan was due to the part that was what "my plan" would have been had I expressed it fully.

So we have - the bankruptcy part would have worked without the bailout which is what I call the path not taken which is unknowable. Somehow the ditz want to take credit for Obama's accomplishments and say Obama's a failure because I woulda given it to you as a "free lunch".

Reagan proved that the "free lunch" argument always wins and people never learn when a free lunch is involved. For example, I get the impression that tea party seniors actually believe they will be able to get all of promised Social Security for the remainder of their lives (20-30 years for some) if there are no new contributions to the fund. Wait until they discover that "for you, things will not change" means that the dollar value of SS they get this minute will never go up and not that the amount promised will be delivered. (Note the latter is my interpretation based on the fact that the words used never change and the literal interpretation is - won't change. If I'm right, it is another after the fact, got ya, thing.)

Response to begin_within (Reply #1)

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
4. Ahhh, a zionist Rothschild conspiracy theorist live and in the flesh.
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 11:14 AM
Oct 2012

I never thought I'd meet one of those outside of a LaRouche rally. Do you think I can pet it, ma?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just when I thought Romne...