HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Eating Their Own: Chris W...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:46 AM

Eating Their Own: Chris Wallace Slams Ed Gillespie Over Romney Citing 6 Phony Tax Studies

Lis Smith ‏@Lis_Smith (Director of Rapid Response, Obama for America)

Watch Chris Wallace absolutely destroy Ed Gillespie over @MittRomney's citing of 6 faux tax studies

8 replies, 1265 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Eating Their Own: Chris Wallace Slams Ed Gillespie Over Romney Citing 6 Phony Tax Studies (Original post)
bigtree Oct 2012 OP
BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #1
99Forever Oct 2012 #2
geckosfeet Oct 2012 #3
garthranzz Oct 2012 #4
Frustratedlady Oct 2012 #5
Baitball Blogger Oct 2012 #6
jsmirman Oct 2012 #7
cilla4progress Oct 2012 #8

Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:50 AM

1. AEI is non-partisan

ffs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:52 AM

2. They lie with such ease.

When caught in the act, they double down.

And it will be dark tonite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:08 AM

3. Bolstering their positions with facts and truth just is not a natural thing for them.

It's quite an amazing thing to watch play out. The r0mn0id campaign is turning into a big tail chasing event.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:10 AM

4. Roger Ailes wants to know who kidnapped Chris Wallace

and replaced him with someone who wants to be a reporter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:14 AM

5. That's the first time I've heard any of them say they'd protect the home interest deduction...

for the middle class.

How can they expect anyone to accept their 20% reduction in tax rates when they won't tell us how they will pay for them? They've already damaged our credit rating and the middle class income, so they can't charge it to either the credit card or the middle class. They sure aren't going to take more than piddily loopholes from the rich and famous. If I were looking for someone to vote for (which I'm not, as I've already voted Obama/Biden) I would think Pugs AND Independents would have more than a few frown lines by now.

This isn't a party you can put your trust in to do what is good for the country OR the middle class that built it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:21 AM

6. AEI -- "I would call it a right-leaning think tank, that doesn't make it not credible."

Wallace: But it isn't bipartisan either.

Yes, I think the smart guys on the right also know what's at stake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:31 AM

7. That "not reduce/increase the share" line of bullshit

is maddening.

The math is quite different from dealing with just what RATE, exactly, will the extra-rich be paying in taxes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigtree (Original post)

Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:34 AM

8. Gillespie's face sure turns red!

Ooops - no more interviews for you Mr. Wallace, if you keep this up!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread