Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:15 AM Oct 2012

Biden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security

Vice President Joe Biden claimed that the administration wasn't aware of requests for more security in Libya before the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi during Thursday night's debate, contradicting two State Department officials and the former head of diplomatic security in Libya.

"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there," Biden said.

In fact, two security officials who worked for the State Department in Libya at the time testified Thursday that they repeatedly requested more security and two State Department officials admitted they had denied those requests.

"All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources," the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, Eric Nordstrom, testified. "In those conversations, I was specifically told [by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb] ‘You cannot request an SST extension.' I determined I was told that because there would be too much political cost. We went ahead and requested it anyway."

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/11/biden_contradicts_state_department_on_benghazi_security

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security (Original Post) dkf Oct 2012 OP
I appreciate your hard work in bringing negative Obama news to DU. DURHAM D Oct 2012 #1
dkf, may i please inquire who you intend to vote for in the upcoming presidential election. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #3
I fully intend to vote for Obama. dkf Oct 2012 #10
you "intend"? CreekDog Oct 2012 #18
I struggle to actually FarPoint Oct 2012 #30
I was just thinking the same thing obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #5
. NoGOPZone Oct 2012 #14
this isn't negative news -- it is negative spin -- just says "State Dept Officials" KurtNYC Oct 2012 #24
I sustained FarPoint Oct 2012 #28
Really? Where does it says that the WH knew? Mass Oct 2012 #2
Don't you know atreides1 Oct 2012 #6
Even some hard right wing members of the MSM admitted requests like that would never reach the oval former-republican Oct 2012 #23
Requests from officers in the field aren't always communicated to the White House. leveymg Oct 2012 #4
***GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT*** Administration doesn't not mean Obama or Biden uponit7771 Oct 2012 #7
Presumably it doesn't mean your State Department is either. dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #11
There is no contradiction. Vattel Oct 2012 #8
It does not say that the White House knew that a request was made. Tennessee Gal Oct 2012 #9
You are SEVERELY underestimating the SIZE of the intelligence community & the MIC JaneyVee Oct 2012 #12
The CIA was on site Angry Dragon Oct 2012 #13
Biden wasn't aware of something that was revealed the day of the debate? I'm shocked librechik Oct 2012 #15
Republicans cut the budget for State Department security. n/t ieoeja Oct 2012 #16
Thank you. I bet Ryan even voted for the cuts. Whiskeytide Oct 2012 #19
Ryan absolutely did cut funding for embassy security Hugabear Oct 2012 #22
Ryan did vote for the cuts. FarPoint Oct 2012 #31
White House: Obama, Biden Weren’t Told About Libya Security Requests dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #17
Because we all know nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #20
The buck stops nowhere marshall Oct 2012 #21
That is part of it nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #25
The sky is blue obliviously Oct 2012 #32
Was this really necessary? theinquisitivechad Oct 2012 #26
Notice how the OP isn't rebutting the points made here. theinquisitivechad Oct 2012 #27
Pure flaimbait... FarPoint Oct 2012 #29

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
3. dkf, may i please inquire who you intend to vote for in the upcoming presidential election.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:19 AM
Oct 2012

Thank you in advance for your answer.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
10. I fully intend to vote for Obama.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:32 AM
Oct 2012

And maybe the problem is that State wasn't keeping the Oval Office up to date. That would fall on Hillary.

FarPoint

(12,343 posts)
30. I struggle to actually
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:08 AM
Oct 2012

believe you are honest and forthcoming..I will continue to try and be open minded as always....yet.....I feel you are enjoying the moment.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
5. I was just thinking the same thing
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:22 AM
Oct 2012

It must be really hard work, especially on a Friday when all one wants to do is sip a Starbucks and coast into the weekend.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
24. this isn't negative news -- it is negative spin -- just says "State Dept Officials"
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:32 AM
Oct 2012

denied the request. That does not seem to be at variance with what Biden said, in spite of the headline.

atreides1

(16,073 posts)
6. Don't you know
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:22 AM
Oct 2012

The magic word "Administration" means that a magical crystal ball emits a beam of light into the President's eyes and he knows what's going on in any part of the known universe at any time!

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
23. Even some hard right wing members of the MSM admitted requests like that would never reach the oval
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:56 AM
Oct 2012

office .

The President doesn't handle things like that

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
4. Requests from officers in the field aren't always communicated to the White House.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:22 AM
Oct 2012

Apparently, there had already been a policy decision made at Foggy Bottom to not treat Libya as a continuing high-risk post. Nordstrum may well have been told quite accurately that "there would be too much political cost" to such an action.

But, ultimately, the Ambassador gets as much protection as he requests, and Stevens was on-board with policy because he was personally deeply invested in making regime change in Libya a success.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
8. There is no contradiction.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:30 AM
Oct 2012

Biden said that "we weren't told." "We" is ambiguous. If it was intended to refer to the Whitehouse, then what Biden said is consistent with the fact that some at the State Department were told that the Embassy wanted more security. The article uncharitably assumes that Biden was claiming that no one in his Adminsitration was told.

Tennessee Gal

(6,160 posts)
9. It does not say that the White House knew that a request was made.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:30 AM
Oct 2012

It does say that Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb knew.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
12. You are SEVERELY underestimating the SIZE of the intelligence community & the MIC
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:35 AM
Oct 2012

It is an entity unto its own. They have a hard time cross sharing intelligence between the CIA & FBI, now add dozens of other intelligence gathering groups like NSA, DHS, etc. and you basically have a loooong game of telephone. Most never reaches the top.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
15. Biden wasn't aware of something that was revealed the day of the debate? I'm shocked
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 11:58 AM
Oct 2012

because communication is always perfect and the administration is always aware of every detail of minor hearings on the hill, even while preparing for a unique debate event.

But when Ryan votes down a request to add security to our embassies worldwide (because hated Obama had requested it--no thought THEN for the endangered embassy personnel) his hands are clean. Is that right?

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
19. Thank you. I bet Ryan even voted for the cuts.
Fri Oct 12, 2012, 01:33 PM
Oct 2012

Hillary said then it would put American lives at risk. Why is no one shoving this up Ryan and Romney's ass?

On edit - should be "asses".

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
22. Ryan absolutely did cut funding for embassy security
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:50 AM
Oct 2012

As Biden rightfully pointed out during the debate.

marshall

(6,665 posts)
21. The buck stops nowhere
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 09:46 AM
Oct 2012

Unfortunately, in our incredibly complicated world, nobody is ultimately in charge of everything. The responsibility is sorted out among many people--some good and some bad. Our hope must be that the good ones outnumber the bad in a world among equals.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. That is part of it
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:52 AM
Oct 2012

but the other, is that it is ok if Republicans do it.

There were TWELVE, yes, TWELVE embassy attacks during the Bush Administration. The OP, and Republicans will scream though the rooftops that Obama had to know (Embassy and Consulate security is way bellow the pay grade of any US President... it is an administrative decision also driven by the moneys authorized for such by the US Congress, which did not approve the requested budget for such), but when the same happened twelve times during the Bush administration, they were silent.

There is more DEMOCRATS did not spin it into a political football

So if they are going to hold hearings, I want to know why those REPUBLICAN Congresmen screaming the loudest, did not aprove the moneys requested by Officials in the State Department.

obliviously

(1,635 posts)
32. The sky is blue
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 01:34 PM
Oct 2012

and there were 12.7 million bicycles sold in 2006, but that still doesn't clarify the accusation in the news story.

theinquisitivechad

(322 posts)
26. Was this really necessary?
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:55 AM
Oct 2012

Was the effort to post negative information worth it to you? Do you think it will help your candidate?

FarPoint

(12,343 posts)
29. Pure flaimbait...
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 11:03 AM
Oct 2012

Negativity runs rampant..... There is history.....

Must go on Ignore list since alerting is futile.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden contradicts State D...