General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security
Vice President Joe Biden claimed that the administration wasn't aware of requests for more security in Libya before the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi during Thursday night's debate, contradicting two State Department officials and the former head of diplomatic security in Libya.
"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there," Biden said.
In fact, two security officials who worked for the State Department in Libya at the time testified Thursday that they repeatedly requested more security and two State Department officials admitted they had denied those requests.
"All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources," the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, Eric Nordstrom, testified. "In those conversations, I was specifically told [by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb] You cannot request an SST extension.' I determined I was told that because there would be too much political cost. We went ahead and requested it anyway."
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/11/biden_contradicts_state_department_on_benghazi_security
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance for your answer.
dkf
(37,305 posts)And maybe the problem is that State wasn't keeping the Oval Office up to date. That would fall on Hillary.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)what kind of wordsmithing is that?
FarPoint
(12,343 posts)believe you are honest and forthcoming..I will continue to try and be open minded as always....yet.....I feel you are enjoying the moment.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)It must be really hard work, especially on a Friday when all one wants to do is sip a Starbucks and coast into the weekend.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)denied the request. That does not seem to be at variance with what Biden said, in spite of the headline.
FarPoint
(12,343 posts)an unsuccessful alert.....
Mass
(27,315 posts)atreides1
(16,073 posts)The magic word "Administration" means that a magical crystal ball emits a beam of light into the President's eyes and he knows what's going on in any part of the known universe at any time!
former-republican
(2,163 posts)office .
The President doesn't handle things like that
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Apparently, there had already been a policy decision made at Foggy Bottom to not treat Libya as a continuing high-risk post. Nordstrum may well have been told quite accurately that "there would be too much political cost" to such an action.
But, ultimately, the Ambassador gets as much protection as he requests, and Stevens was on-board with policy because he was personally deeply invested in making regime change in Libya a success.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Biden said that "we weren't told." "We" is ambiguous. If it was intended to refer to the Whitehouse, then what Biden said is consistent with the fact that some at the State Department were told that the Embassy wanted more security. The article uncharitably assumes that Biden was claiming that no one in his Adminsitration was told.
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)It does say that Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb knew.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)It is an entity unto its own. They have a hard time cross sharing intelligence between the CIA & FBI, now add dozens of other intelligence gathering groups like NSA, DHS, etc. and you basically have a loooong game of telephone. Most never reaches the top.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)because communication is always perfect and the administration is always aware of every detail of minor hearings on the hill, even while preparing for a unique debate event.
But when Ryan votes down a request to add security to our embassies worldwide (because hated Obama had requested it--no thought THEN for the endangered embassy personnel) his hands are clean. Is that right?
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)Hillary said then it would put American lives at risk. Why is no one shoving this up Ryan and Romney's ass?
On edit - should be "asses".
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)As Biden rightfully pointed out during the debate.
FarPoint
(12,343 posts)VP Biden made such a point.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Now in LBN as well :http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014264464
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The President knows everything.
marshall
(6,665 posts)Unfortunately, in our incredibly complicated world, nobody is ultimately in charge of everything. The responsibility is sorted out among many people--some good and some bad. Our hope must be that the good ones outnumber the bad in a world among equals.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but the other, is that it is ok if Republicans do it.
There were TWELVE, yes, TWELVE embassy attacks during the Bush Administration. The OP, and Republicans will scream though the rooftops that Obama had to know (Embassy and Consulate security is way bellow the pay grade of any US President... it is an administrative decision also driven by the moneys authorized for such by the US Congress, which did not approve the requested budget for such), but when the same happened twelve times during the Bush administration, they were silent.
There is more DEMOCRATS did not spin it into a political football
So if they are going to hold hearings, I want to know why those REPUBLICAN Congresmen screaming the loudest, did not aprove the moneys requested by Officials in the State Department.
obliviously
(1,635 posts)and there were 12.7 million bicycles sold in 2006, but that still doesn't clarify the accusation in the news story.
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)Was the effort to post negative information worth it to you? Do you think it will help your candidate?
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)Curious.
FarPoint
(12,343 posts)Negativity runs rampant..... There is history.....
Must go on Ignore list since alerting is futile.