Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:21 AM Oct 2012

Can someone explain to me the importance of the whole "Romney crib sheet" theory?

1. It was a handkerchief, at least as far as Rachel Maddow was concerned on her show last night.

2. Even if it wasn't, what's the argument here? That the President of the United States of America had a poor debate showing because Mitt Romney had a crib sheet?

Um...huh?

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone explain to me the importance of the whole "Romney crib sheet" theory? (Original Post) WilliamPitt Oct 2012 OP
Agreed. I don't get it. nt MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #1
It's a stupid and pointless sour grapes argument ibegurpard Oct 2012 #2
Some peoples' entire belief structure was shaken by Obama's performance... Cooley Hurd Oct 2012 #3
My belief structure has not been shaken in the least, Chorophyll Oct 2012 #27
I don't think it's all that wacky, given that we know he lies and cheats, anyway. Rhiannon12866 Oct 2012 #59
that he is a bigfatcheating liar Evergreen Emerald Oct 2012 #4
which just a little research proves anyway MH1 Oct 2012 #24
May I? nc4bo Oct 2012 #5
OK WilliamPitt Oct 2012 #6
It makes zero sense to me as well quinnox Oct 2012 #7
There's no great theory behind it. It's just the fact that he might have "cheated" CJCRANE Oct 2012 #8
B-I-N-G-O-O-O-O-O-O-O! mazzarro Oct 2012 #41
Bingo Bongo Bango Berlum Oct 2012 #53
It's ridiculous... like Gore saying it was the altitude budkin Oct 2012 #9
To be so successful in biz.. HipChick Oct 2012 #10
Insignificant. Even if he did cheat he used the square root of WTF math. Borrowed from L.O. lonestarnot Oct 2012 #11
"the square root of WTF math" Lucinda Oct 2012 #60
If he's lying, and cheating... sofa king Oct 2012 #12
Oooo... OOOoooo... OOOOOO... Mr. Kotter!!! RevStPatrick Oct 2012 #13
Hmm that one started here nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #15
why would he even need a crib sheet? booley Oct 2012 #14
haha exactly ibegurpard Oct 2012 #18
BINGO! RC Oct 2012 #52
well he wouldn't have written down facts. he would have written down topics. unblock Oct 2012 #20
Goes to character - if he cheats at this, what else does he cheat at? liberal N proud Oct 2012 #16
Are you kidding? If Romney was caught cheating, you don't think that's important? Jim__ Oct 2012 #17
Find the cspan video of Romney going back to the podium after the debate is over Lars39 Oct 2012 #19
IMO warrior1 Oct 2012 #21
Romney didn't need a cheat sheet to lie his ass off Nevernose Oct 2012 #22
A cheat sheet to keep his lies straight. emulatorloo Oct 2012 #29
nice strawman. unblock Oct 2012 #23
GOP has to cheat. They can't win fair-and-square. Octafish Oct 2012 #25
And that is why so many here saw a folded piece of paper, instead of the handkerchief it was. RC Oct 2012 #56
That's not what I saw. Octafish Oct 2012 #57
Has nothing to do with winning the debate - like the 47% video... polichick Oct 2012 #26
No, its the fact that Romney and those like him, feel that the rules do not apply to them. cleanhippie Oct 2012 #28
Who says it had any effect on Obama whatsoever? Chorophyll Oct 2012 #30
If Romney cheated on his President Exam, he gets an Automatic F. emulatorloo Oct 2012 #31
It's wishful thinking slackmaster Oct 2012 #32
Here's my take... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #33
well, after reading all that, I'd rather just deal quinnox Oct 2012 #35
What does that mean? CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #36
lets just say I thought that was a pretty torturous explanation quinnox Oct 2012 #37
Yeah, I probably should have... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #38
You did just fine IMO. CJCRANE Oct 2012 #40
The most interesting part of the "after the debate" video is when Mittens LibDemAlways Oct 2012 #44
As we watched the "ater-the-debate-shuffle," my husband said it was an envelope of money - maybe sad sally Oct 2012 #58
there is a close up in the original thread that 2pooped2pop Oct 2012 #45
My personal guess is that if Current TV can get its hands on better video, this might go somewhere. gkhouston Oct 2012 #50
Agree with you completely dooner Oct 2012 #62
#1 I think it was notes cilla4progress Oct 2012 #34
Nothing happens in a vacuum aandegoons Oct 2012 #39
That whole "he cheated" thing was an embarrassment, for DU, Kos, etc. Skip Intro Oct 2012 #42
Disagree dooner Oct 2012 #63
no no no 2pooped2pop Oct 2012 #64
Right... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #65
Nothing to do with President Obama and everything to do with Mitt Romney Th1onein Oct 2012 #43
Wow, stunned to see you write that. 2pooped2pop Oct 2012 #46
I have to disagree with premise of your question... -Steph- Oct 2012 #47
IMHO, the significance is that such a thing would be plausible for Romney. blue neen Oct 2012 #48
I completely agree with you. -Steph- Oct 2012 #55
Non-stop lying is hard to do blogslut Oct 2012 #49
it was not a hockeynut57 Oct 2012 #51
Winner of this thread! Ha Ha! nm Cha Oct 2012 #61
It was not a crib sheet. It was not a handkerchief. It was his extra set of retread Oct 2012 #54

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
2. It's a stupid and pointless sour grapes argument
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Oct 2012

that I would expect from a Freeper.
What we should be talking about is the offensiveness of people who are gnashing their teeth because of good economic news.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
3. Some peoples' entire belief structure was shaken by Obama's performance...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Oct 2012

...so much so that they will accept the wackiest of CT's to explain it away.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
27. My belief structure has not been shaken in the least,
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:01 PM
Oct 2012

but I do think that if Romney needed a cribsheet to keep his lies straight, AND violated the rules of the debate, it's sort of a big deal.

Rhiannon12866

(202,970 posts)
59. I don't think it's all that wacky, given that we know he lies and cheats, anyway.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 04:31 PM
Oct 2012

And, for those of us who remember the bulge under Bush*'s jacket or Jim Bunning's bizarre remote debate, nothing seems farfetched.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
4. that he is a bigfatcheating liar
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Oct 2012

I don't necessarily believe the conspiracy theory, but I do get the import of it.

Liar....lying liar....cheating lying liar.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
5. May I?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:25 AM
Oct 2012

I posted this in another thread earlier, forgive me for C&P.
-------

I know there are many who think this is a big fat nothing issue, perhaps it is, perhaps it ain't but just the fact that we are even having this discussion proves a small point.

Mitt Romney and the Romney campaign has a problem defining Mitt Romney's character in a positive way. They've ALWAYS have had this problem! All the hard work they've done to define the public's perception of the Mitt Romney brand failed and is easily chipped away.

That so many people are questioning these actions proves to me that all the building-up of the shell aka Mitt Romney is on very shaky ground.

It's not about the CHEAT, it's the fact that we're questioning Mitt Romney's character.
-------

At least those are my honest thoughts and feelings.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
7. It makes zero sense to me as well
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:27 AM
Oct 2012

Even if they were notes, so? Its just another lame excuse for Obama I'm thinking.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
8. There's no great theory behind it. It's just the fact that he might have "cheated"
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:27 AM
Oct 2012

according to the rules of the debate. It doesn't excuse Obama's performance. It just puts a question mark over Romney's character.

Bush also cheated in one of his debates when he used an earpiece.

mazzarro

(3,450 posts)
41. B-I-N-G-O-O-O-O-O-O-O!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:49 PM
Oct 2012

This whole thing has to make sense only to Rmoney and his campaign - and no one else! If Rmoney is someone that cannot hold contradicting ideas in his mind and simultaneously keep his argument for either one straight, then keeping a cheat-sheet is likely to help him in this regard. Rmoney has proven that he flounders around with all the contradictions he has woven around his campaign, so it won't surprise me if he needed a note to help out.

budkin

(6,688 posts)
9. It's ridiculous... like Gore saying it was the altitude
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:28 AM
Oct 2012

Man up, admit you got your clock cleaned and do better next time

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
10. To be so successful in biz..
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:28 AM
Oct 2012

you often have to be a cheating down liar, doing anything to close the deal...the only thing you care about is winning..no matter what it takes...I've spent a lot of time around these 1% folks for work, their biz dealings and ability to screw people over ...there is a narrative of Mitt's character to be held under the telescope here..

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
12. If he's lying, and cheating...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:32 AM
Oct 2012

... then we must assume that he will also try to steal this election.

That is the significance to me. Mitt Romney is a sociopath unbound by ethics or prior agreement.

And now he's close enough to steal it.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
13. Oooo... OOOoooo... OOOOOO... Mr. Kotter!!!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:32 AM
Oct 2012


It gives people something silly to be outraged about?
Is that the answer?

It's an "issue" that allows us to defend our tribe against the interloper, who would dare to challenge our tribal superiority?
Something like that?

It's yet another one of those things that the corporate media is using to create controversy in order to keep the race close so that their ad revenue doesn't dry up to the slow trickle that it should be if they were being honest about this race?
It that it?

booley

(3,855 posts)
14. why would he even need a crib sheet?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:34 AM
Oct 2012

why would you need a crib sheet if you're going to just pull stuff out of your posterior?

I've argued with a lot of cons. they generally have very quick response times because they aren't wasting time making sure what they say is true.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
18. haha exactly
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:42 AM
Oct 2012

and I think that explains Obama's performance as well. How do you debate someone who just makes shit up that's the complete opposite of what he's been saying his entire campaign?

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
52. BINGO!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:12 PM
Oct 2012

Obama got blindsided by all the lies. I betting it won't happen the next go round.
If Obama had spent the time necessary to contradict the lies, he would not have had time to make his points. So which do people want? Obama couldn't do both in the time allotted.

unblock

(51,974 posts)
20. well he wouldn't have written down facts. he would have written down topics.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:49 AM
Oct 2012

just quick reminders to make sure he hit all the points he wanted to hit.
or got in the lines he wanted to get in (like "... not entitled to your own facts&quot

Jim__

(14,045 posts)
17. Are you kidding? If Romney was caught cheating, you don't think that's important?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:42 AM
Oct 2012

I'm not saying he was cheating; but if he was that definitely has implications for anyone who's thinking about voting for him. And, yes, that could easily cause Obama to lose. In a debate where you have no notes, where everything has to come from your memory, a person with notes has a clear advantage. He doesn't have to concern himself with remembering details. They're right in front of him.

I heard Rachel ask that and I really couldn't believe that she didn't see the issue.

Lars39

(26,093 posts)
19. Find the cspan video of Romney going back to the podium after the debate is over
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:43 AM
Oct 2012

And then handing the already been folded notes off to a son. Coupled with the pre-debate footage it all looks pretty skeevy.

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
21. IMO
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:50 AM
Oct 2012

though I don't believe he had "notes"

If he did, it would because when you tell the truth you don't have to remember what you said. Lying takes skill and Romney may have succeed in making it seem like he won. In the short term, next day people where talking about Big Bird. People in the end want substance and the President gave it to us.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
22. Romney didn't need a cheat sheet to lie his ass off
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:53 AM
Oct 2012

Rodney's entire debate was nothing but six tons of bullshit, so why would he need a cheat sheet? He's at the point where he doesn't even bother keeping the lies consistent. And for that reason, I'm in the handkerchief camp.

emulatorloo

(43,979 posts)
29. A cheat sheet to keep his lies straight.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:02 PM
Oct 2012

If you are honest you don't have to worry about consistency.

unblock

(51,974 posts)
23. nice strawman.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:56 AM
Oct 2012

it's a bit like saying "doesn't matter if tiger woods cheated; what's the argument, that the other guy went over par because tiger used steroids?"

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
25. GOP has to cheat. They can't win fair-and-square.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:58 AM
Oct 2012

From history, "There you go again." Inspired, no doubt, by some trusted staffer who helped himself to Jimmy Carter's debate prep book.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
56. And that is why so many here saw a folded piece of paper, instead of the handkerchief it was.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:27 PM
Oct 2012

Romney is not bu$h. Stop thinking that he is. That is dangerous. He did not need so obviously a displayed a prop. When the "debate" was over and his son retrieved it(?), it was because it had been used (Mitt did wipe his face with it)and Mitt didn't want to deal with the soiled item any longer. The son most likely gave it to the help to wash.

Given Romney's arrogance, he probably prepped the preppers for the debate.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
57. That's not what I saw.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 04:03 PM
Oct 2012

Romney moved his hand with the papers when the lectern blocked the audience and Lehrer from view.

If it was a hanky, IMFO, he wouldn't have gone to such pains to hide it.













As it stands, this clearly shows the guy's a cheating bastard in the tradition of the GOP.

As for Romney being Bush: While they're not the same person, they both serve the same interests.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
26. Has nothing to do with winning the debate - like the 47% video...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:59 AM
Oct 2012

...it shows exactly who Romney is. Period.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
28. No, its the fact that Romney and those like him, feel that the rules do not apply to them.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:01 PM
Oct 2012

They feel the rules only apply when they are convenient to them, and when they aren't, then they can skirt them, just this once.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
30. Who says it had any effect on Obama whatsoever?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:05 PM
Oct 2012

But you don't think it's a problem if one side continually cheats its way to "victory?"

I'm terribly sorry we're all annoying you so much this week, William.

emulatorloo

(43,979 posts)
31. If Romney cheated on his President Exam, he gets an Automatic F.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:06 PM
Oct 2012

C'mon Will. Has nothing to do w Obama's not so great performance.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
33. Here's my take...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:10 PM
Oct 2012

If Romney did have notes on the podium--that means he knowingly and deliberately violated the rules of the debate and cheated. And absolutely YES--that is important and newsworthy. It's historical news if it's true. He's denied it, so he would be cheating--then also lying.

Also, I don't think the cheating (having notes) has ANYTHING to do with Obama's lackluster debate performance. These are two entirely separate issues. I don't think Romney's cheating says one whit about Obama's performance. We're talking about completely separate issues here and I don't know why people are mixing these two points.

Lastly, this cheating issue is a dead issue unless someone wants to gather the evidence needed to make a definitive call on this. It can be done. We've certainly got the technology. Here is what we need:
---The full video shot behind of the candidates that ran the entire length of the debate.
------This video is needed for looking at the following: What happened to the "object" after he put it on the podium? Did he unfold it, look at it as if he was reading it? Does it appear that it was a hanky with paper wrapped in it. Does he ever unfold a folded paper at the podium? If so, that's the money shot right there, as there was no folded paper on the podium before he walked up to it.
The video is also needed to zoom in on the object. Can we see writing on it?

That's what is needed. If we don't have that video--we have absolutely nothing but conspiracy theory and a bunch of people suggesting that we are sore losers looking for a reason that Obama lost. We leave ourselves open for the right-wing to spin this in their favor.

So, if we can't get a hold of the video--then we need to drop it. For sure.

If someone does get a hold of that behind-the-podium video, and it does show strong evidence of cheating, then we need enhanced audio from after the debate.

It would also be helpful to get audio-enhanced video of the post-debate discussion, when Romney was in front of the podium with his family. This video is really quite compelling. Mitt walks to the podium, gathers his papers and re-joins his family. Ann looks at the papers in his hand and does a double take. You clearly see a jarring -- almost instantaneous -- difference in her manner and mood. She looks panicked. She says something like, "We need to get you off...stage...NOW!" but it is not clear. She seems to be moving everyone to action, when just seconds earlier she was chatting and lingering at the podium with her family. She also says something else to one of her sons, in the same hurried tone.

So---If someone can get a hold of the behind-the-podium video that was shot---and enhance the audio on the post-debate Romney social hour---you can answer all of these questions. If cheating did happen and you can find those things on the behind-the-podium video (unfolding paper, words on that paper, etc., video of Romney unfolding hanky and showing paper inside, etc.) then you've got him.

Without it---we have nothing and we need to let it go.

So far, I haven't heard anything about where this video is or who has it or if it still exists or ever existed (Does CSPAN have it?).

It's ridiculous for people to argue that we're suggesting that Romney cheated and therefore that explains why Obama did poorly. That is not what anyone is saying. Those two things (Romney cheating and Obama doing poorly) can exist in the same situation and can be unrelated.

We know Obama did poorly. I think we've all moved on from that. But we're just now realizing that Romney may have cheated. That is important--because it speaks to his character. Also, if he did cheat--that really makes that post-debate Romney family scene even more compelling. They were all (including Ann) conspiring to cover up the fact that he cheated. That's certainly newsworthy, now isn't it? If Kennedy, Nixon or George Bush had done this and was caught--we'd still be talking about that today.

I'm not saying we know the facts. The point is..we don't know--and it's important to find out the definitives with that video.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
35. well, after reading all that, I'd rather just deal
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:15 PM
Oct 2012

with those who say everyone was wrong, and Obama actually had a great performance!

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
36. What does that mean?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:23 PM
Oct 2012

And yeah, I tend to be verbose on the computer. I type 90 wpm. I know, it's obnoxious.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
44. The most interesting part of the "after the debate" video is when Mittens
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:17 PM
Oct 2012

breaks away from the crowd on stage and hightails it back to the podium to collect his papers - and whatever was on them. It may well have been only notes he took during the debate. We will probably never know. However, he was clearly preoccupied with getting ahold of those papers, and, when he realized they wouldn't fit in his jacket inner pocket, he quickly handed them off to a son who didn't for a second hesitate before squirreling them away.

If there is a video of the entire debate taken from behind the podium, I would love to see it just to satisfy my own curiosity about the handkerchief - where it was before he used it and where it went afterward. There is a podium shot that looks to me like there was a little spiral notebook on the podium. I've never seen a handkerchief that looks like a spiral notebook.

At any rate, no denying Mittens is a liar. Wouldn't at all surprise me to learn he's a cheater too.

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
58. As we watched the "ater-the-debate-shuffle," my husband said it was an envelope of money - maybe
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 04:30 PM
Oct 2012

for Mr. PBS Moderator, who was so cooperative, which he had son Tagg deliver.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
45. there is a close up in the original thread that
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:24 PM
Oct 2012

shows a folded piece of paper on his podium. It is folded more than once. It appears to have writing on it.

And you are absolutely correct that the issue of if Mittens cheated, does not change Obama not performing in the way we wanted him to. It would however explain where Mitt got all the number's he was throwing around.

gkhouston

(21,642 posts)
50. My personal guess is that if Current TV can get its hands on better video, this might go somewhere.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:45 PM
Oct 2012

Otherwise, it'll remain as speculation pinging around the internet.

dooner

(1,217 posts)
62. Agree with you completely
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 04:42 PM
Oct 2012

Can't figure out why character issue isn't obvious to everyone and can't figure out why people with access to all the video aren't just looking into it and putting hankygate to rest instead of acting outraged and/or ashamed that some people are wondering about it.

(But I don't really get what Mitt could possibly have written on any notes that would have been worth the risk.. (47%, 5 trillion?)

cilla4progress

(24,585 posts)
34. #1 I think it was notes
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:13 PM
Oct 2012

#2 explains how he was able to spew so many factoids
#3 consistent with his lyin' cheatin' character - wouldn't put it past to him to cheat.

"That's all."

aandegoons

(473 posts)
39. Nothing happens in a vacuum
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:30 PM
Oct 2012

So far Romney has been caught in a lie a lot. Add to that the cheating during the debates, questions of his taxes, hiding his money overseas and dodging the draft it becomes a character flaw.

When you also factor in the biggest liar of all Ryan then it becomes a real issue to many. Romney becomes known as a person who is untrustworthy maybe even criminal. Even if he is not some will still see him as such.

The DNC is not trying to change the votes of die hard republicans. They are trying to change the votes of the few undecided and the republican lites.

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
42. That whole "he cheated" thing was an embarrassment, for DU, Kos, etc.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:54 PM
Oct 2012

The threads with 100 recs about it here have fallen away, thankfully. Kos killed commenting on his site's piece, and it has fallen out of view. CBS DC's Bill Buck's article is being buried by negative comments even after he added a "nevermind" update, and despite an evident effort to delete such comments.

Embarrassing.

I wonder how many DUers were called trolls for expressing doubt or urging caution about the whole thing.

dooner

(1,217 posts)
63. Disagree
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 05:04 PM
Oct 2012

It's only embarrassing if used as an excuse for Obama's performance, which isn't what I saw happening. If one is asking the question because of genuine interest in learning more about Romney's character, then it's an important issue. It's also of broader "human interest" because I don't think half the country knows who/what to believe when they start talking numbers.

I think that publicly theorizing about altitude/whatever affected the President's performance is embarrassing because it sounds like one is making excuses.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
64. no no no
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 06:59 PM
Oct 2012

Don't you know we are suppose to sit down and shut the fuck up. We wouldn't want those republicans to think bad of us.

So tired of everyone worrying about what those who wish to destroy the world thinks of us.

There was nothing wrong with speculating when we see something so fucking blatant. We were suppose to just say "shhhh! Republicans will be republicans. What harm can it do really?"

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
65. Right...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:30 PM
Oct 2012

If Obama had won the debate hands down, I would still want to find out if Romney had cheated.

This is not about Obama or his debate performance, at all.

It's about Romney's character and if he did take folded up notes into the debate. Furthermore, if he did do this, he also tried to conceal it by returning to the podium after the debate and retrieving those materials. And also, Ann saw what was in his hand, and she did a double take, seemed to panic and then said, "We've got to get you off this stage!" I'd say it's big new if he did this!!!

I think this needs to be resolved under the table. Someone needs to get the video from CSPAN; the behind-the podium video that remained rolling throughout the debate.

It's not insane or sour grapes to ask questions about this.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
43. Nothing to do with President Obama and everything to do with Mitt Romney
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 12:57 PM
Oct 2012

It spreaks to his character, which is a major issue in any election.

The idea that it has something to do with Obama's poor performance has nothing to do with it. I've seen here people saying that anyone who brings this up is trying to make "excuses" for Obama's poor performance. That is not the case at all.

I, for one, am very pissed off because this is the THIRD time these fuckers have cheated during a debate.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
46. Wow, stunned to see you write that.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:26 PM
Oct 2012

I don't see how you don't get it. It has nothing to do with Obama. Obama could have knocked it out of the park and if we though Mitt had the audacity to cheat especially at such a forum, we would still be pointing it out and trying to find out the truth.

So far, everyone I have seen deny it, has failed to look closely at all of the footage and all of the closeups.

-Steph-

(409 posts)
47. I have to disagree with premise of your question...
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:38 PM
Oct 2012

I don't think anyone is insinuating that somehow the President's performance was based on whether or not Mitt Romney had a cheat sheet. That wouldn't even make sense, as you pointed out. I think people are simply wondering what Mitt Romney pulled out of his pocket and unfolded, and why he was so quick to get rid of it after the debate, and was it against the rules?

I personally think it was likely a handkerchief and nothing more, but I could be wrong. And I certainly can't fault anyone for thinking it maybe looked suspicious, because it kind of did when it was coupled with the way he acted with the notes after the debate.

If it were indeed something against the rules such as notes, then I would definitely take issue with that, as would most.

On a side note, not all of us feel the President had a poor showing at the debate. While it wasn't perfect by any means, I wouldn't call it "poor". With all the initial media hype disappearing, I feel Romney came off much worse in that debate vs the President.

blue neen

(12,306 posts)
48. IMHO, the significance is that such a thing would be plausible for Romney.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:38 PM
Oct 2012

It underscores the fact that no one really trusts Romney and the Republicans.

All the things that Republicans have done, particularly since stealing the election since 2000, means we just about expect them to lie, cheat, steal, fix, plunder, and do whatever they can to win.

He may or may not have cheated. It's the fact that Americans believe he's capable of it that's important.

Remember, this is a man who will not release his tax returns. As David Letterman said so well last night, we have a felon running for President.

-Steph-

(409 posts)
55. I completely agree with you.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:25 PM
Oct 2012

It really does play into the bigger narrative that he's someone that can't be trusted, that he's capable of sinking to this kind of low, that it's plausible he would do something like this. It wouldn't seem like that far of a stretch, and that in and of itself is pretty significant.

blogslut

(37,955 posts)
49. Non-stop lying is hard to do
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:42 PM
Oct 2012

Maybe he needed notes to keep the whoppers straight.


*NOTE* I am not one of the folks who think RMoney used a cheat sheet. I do think he lied his ass off and bullied his way through that whole thing - while Obama just let him dig a deep, deep hole.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone explain to me...