Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:59 PM Oct 2012

Style Vs Substance.... Which one counts more historically?

Style Vs Substance.... Which one counts more historically?

Can substance override style?

Given RayGun LIED HIS ASS OFF when he said "...there you go again..." in regards to his opposition to medicare it looks like style wins...

Your take?

Regards

My take is rMoney NEEDED a game changer and didn't have one...there was no "there you go again" moment...Obama needed to go through 12 rounds and still be standing and he did.

The disappointment is that he could've knocked rMoney out with two punch combos throughout the night and he didn't.....

Now the money will poor back into the rMoney campaign and not into congress....just my silver lining take

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Style Vs Substance.... Which one counts more historically? (Original Post) uponit7771 Oct 2012 OP
Romney's style was...spoiled Brat ish Evergreen Emerald Oct 2012 #1
In a fight (which this debate turned into due to Lehrer) spoiled brat counts to LIVs on the other... uponit7771 Oct 2012 #6
Voting for President is a gut vote. earthside Oct 2012 #2
If he came out too aggressive now BumRushDaShow Oct 2012 #4
The classic example of style vs substance Spider Jerusalem Oct 2012 #3
Fact checkers will help President Obama. bluestate10 Oct 2012 #5
There are some who say the commericials will be good....they better, letting someone lie .. uponit7771 Oct 2012 #7

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
6. In a fight (which this debate turned into due to Lehrer) spoiled brat counts to LIVs on the other...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:14 AM
Oct 2012

...hand people with integrity care about the lying but rMoney is NOT being painted as a liar...kinda frustrated with Plouffes take on the 47%

earthside

(6,960 posts)
2. Voting for President is a gut vote.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:06 AM
Oct 2012

More than any other office people vote for president from their gut.

So style does matter more than usual for the presidency.

For the next debate, Pres. Obama better have some more assertive style, some more aggressive style, and some more combative stye.

BumRushDaShow

(128,527 posts)
4. If he came out too aggressive now
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:09 AM
Oct 2012

then he would have to up it even more at the next debate, otherwise people will say - "oh, he's not as aggressive as he was in the last debate". And then by time he was at the last debate, anything less than rabid foaming-at-the-mouth spewing, would be considered a "fail". And that would lose it for him.

THAT is the issue.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. The classic example of style vs substance
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:08 AM
Oct 2012

(although pointing it out as such may be unpopular): Kennedy/Nixon, 1960. Polling after the debate showed that people who heard it on the radio thought Nixon won. But people who saw it on television thought JFK won. And this was just at the point when TV came into its own as a medium in political campaigns.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
5. Fact checkers will help President Obama.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:10 AM
Oct 2012

But President Obama needs to do a fucking better job of cornering Romney when Romney lies. President Obama squandered opportunity after opportunity tonight, that was crushing to watch.

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
7. There are some who say the commericials will be good....they better, letting someone lie ..
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:27 AM
Oct 2012

...like rMoney did isn't good

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Style Vs Substance.... Wh...