General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear people whining about how you have to pay taxes to support "moochers"
like disabled veterans, great-grandmothers, and pre-schoolers.
Who are the people who think they're victims here? 'Cause it sounds an awful lot to me like it's the selfish assholes doing the pouting and moaning about paying taxes.
Take your butthurt asses to Somalia, and fuck you very much.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)"Freedom isn't free, so stop whining and pay your taxes".
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... you didn't think that defense budget was protecting your 15-year old car, did you?
Response to XemaSab (Original post)
GeorgeGist This message was self-deleted by its author.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)the real "moochers." They don't want to contribute anything to the society, "they," are the real welfare queens in America. They are parasites and loafers out for a free lunch. I agree sooo much "Take your butthurt asses to Somalia, and fuck you very much."
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)They created the poor, then they bitch about them.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)What is worse? using money to help or kill?
Hey Repugs, what would Jesus do?
lexx21
(321 posts)And I agree with you to a degree... our taxes have paid for a war that we NEVER needed to have. As far as Afghanistan goes, there is absolutely no way to "win the hearts and minds" of their people. It does NOT work.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)As a Chrsitian who lives in Oklahoma rethugs hate when I mention Matthew 17:22-27... Even Jesus paid taxes.... I believe there are 47 Bible verses about paying taxes correct me if I'm wrong..
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)To clarify my point- I was not insinuating not to pay taxes, just what a "Christian Nation" should be using those taxes for. Helping not killing.
I am not claiming this should be a Christian nation, but most Republicans feel that way.
siligut
(12,272 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)ck4829
(35,045 posts)Fundamentalist maniacs on one side, warlords on another, and now 'Who do these liberals think they are wanting the government to FEED people? It's like they think food grows on trees or something! AAAAhhhhgh!' types on the other, I think that would be too much.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)You can't buy beer or cigarettes or pay your cable bill with food stamps.
The money spent on Medicaid and Medicare goes to pay doctors, nurses, pharmaceutical companies and hospitals. You can't buy beer of cigarettes or pay your cable bill with Medicaid or Medicare money.
Most of the money spent on Social Security goes to pay for food, medical co-pays, rent and/or property taxes and utilities and an occasional gift for a family member. You can buy cigarettes or beer or even pay your cable bill with your Social Security check. But for many seniors, the check just isn't big enough to pay for those kinds of "extras."
One thing is pretty sure, if you are relying on food stamps, Medicaid or Social Security for most or all of your income, you probably don't belong to a country club, own a yacht or travel (unless someone else pays for those things).
The Republicans assume that everyone enjoys their lifestyle. They cannot imagine and do not understand how people live who don't have their kind of money.
I should add this. Think about all the money paid by Homeland Security for security checks in our airports. Who benefits? Airlines and people who have high enough incomes to allow them to pay for airline tickets. The people who live off food stamps and most on Social Security fly on planes very, very rarely if at all.
Think about almost any area of government expenditures, government budget items. The amounts spent to help the wealthy or to keep American businesses going is a very, very large portion of the government. Governments buy computers, build schools, courthouses, city halls, parks.
I could probably provide for my own security and policing by building a huge wall around my house and buying an armored car. We have police so that we can travel freely in our communities. Thieves are unlikely to be interested in my house. Hardly worth the risk to break and enter. It's wealthy people who really need a strong police presence. We need it mostly to protect us from the gangs in our midst. But we could build big walls around our houses and achieve that effect. It would look ugly -- but we could do it. The rich, who rely on flowing markets, buying and selling, for their wealth, cannot close themselves off and survive on a small garden.
If you think about it, we all rely on the government. Who are the real leaches?
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)What is this, 1984?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)have money. I'm responding to that lie.
Initech
(100,063 posts)Executive pay in this country has increased to astronomical proportions over the average worker. And taxes on their wealth have diminished to next to nothing. And we foot their bill. Romney is their poster boy for this and if he's elected who's to stop them from looting every last cent?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)were to take a day off work, preferably the same day that all the undocumented workers out there do so, maybe the elite would finally understand what exactly is meant by the phrase, "working poor". Maybe they'd begin to have a clue just how many necessary jobs are poorly paid.
starroute
(12,977 posts)It costs an average of about $30,000 to keep someone in prisoner for a year -- as much as $47,000 in some states.
These people are the real "moochers" -- getting free food, free housing, and free medical care.
And as of a couple of years ago, there were 2.5 million prisoners in the United States. That's approaching $100 billion dollars every year.
I'd gladly see a fair chunk of those people on welfare instead of in prison. It would be a lot cheaper for all of us -- not even counting the indirect social costs.
But we live in a system based on coercion, and the idea of paying people not to commit crimes is anathema to those who believe in punishment as the solution to all social problems.
Too bad.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Because the dirty little secret is that all of the RICH, all of them have the means and ability to move, hide and play the system. You and I don't get to game the system it is rigged in their favor and unless you seriously just take a straight percent of their earnings you can't beat them.
I support a flat tax for everyone making above 250K per year 40 percent flat tax no loopholes, no deductions, no gaming the system you pay your fair share....
but no one is even talking about anything like that, that certainly would pay down our debt....
shenmue
(38,506 posts)We have a winner!
livingonearth
(728 posts)are always calling themselves the quote/ unquote "job creators". Maybe they need to stop whining so much and create something for a change.
HatTrick
(129 posts)I think we should talk about the "moochers" who pay no taxes.
I don't mean the retiree living below on $20,000 a year, I mean the companies making billions a year in profit that don't pay any taxes.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/04/top-tax-dodging-companies-politicians
Those are the real moochers, why can't we talk about them?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Because If America starts to think of the rich as being the ones suffering from the whole "victim mentality" then they will lose the debate.
Because the typical American LOVES to look at a whiny rich person and say cynically, "Ahhh,...poor baby. Life is sooo rough for you."
Let's face it. For the rich, "problems at home" can be the butler arguing with the maid and the chauffeur over something the nanny did.