Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(9,940 posts)
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:07 PM Sep 2012

The real blunder in Romney's speech is not so much the "47%" line, it's:::>

"My job is not to worry about these people."

We can discuss until the cows come home what percentage of the people pay how much taxes, and how or why.

But the bottom line is, Romney is saying that his job is to not worry about half of the country, the half that make the least amount of money. He's saying not only does he not give a shit about these people, but he thinks it's actually his JOB to not give a shit about these people.

Someone with audio experience should do a remix of this sound byte.... play it in slow motion, backwards, it will be the quote that ends his run for president. Dean's scream on steroids.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The real blunder in Romney's speech is not so much the "47%" line, it's:::> (Original Post) garybeck Sep 2012 OP
You're on your own, moochers. n/t grasswire Sep 2012 #1
It's the other side of the whole Obamacare like gollygee Sep 2012 #2
spread it far and wide OriginalGeek Sep 2012 #3
That--and "they'll never take personal responsibility"--what a horrible condemnation of TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #4
I agree. BUT that means SOMEONE is his BOSS NOW. The Koch Bros., anyone? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #28
Strictly speaking, I think he meant his "job" as candidate. VWolf Sep 2012 #5
what's the difference? n/t garybeck Sep 2012 #6
That was his explanation loyalsister Sep 2012 #10
but does it really make a difference? garybeck Sep 2012 #11
Oh I agree entirely. But he's never made any sense to me. n/t VWolf Sep 2012 #14
That's exactly what he's trying to spin loyalsister Sep 2012 #15
yeah, I heard that too. I just don't think it makes any sense. :) garybeck Sep 2012 #17
It's a ridiculous effort loyalsister Sep 2012 #24
Spin it all you want, sis RobertEarl Sep 2012 #19
It's generous to group him with 53% loyalsister Sep 2012 #26
28. I agree. BUT that means SOMEONE is his BOSS NOW. The Koch Bros., anyone? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #29
I frame it, 'Romney isn't worried about injured war vets, seniors, children, and the disabled.' n/t Dawgs Sep 2012 #7
and it's his JOB do not worry about them, too! tough job he has, to not worry about poor people! garybeck Sep 2012 #8
That should be hungry children sarge43 Sep 2012 #34
The contrast is astounding on so many levels loyalsister Sep 2012 #9
I wish I were a fly on the wall DawgHouse Sep 2012 #12
We the People Gregorian Sep 2012 #13
Mitts idea of WE, the people RobertEarl Sep 2012 #16
I don't see how he can uphold the Constitution with his neglect of the 47%. Gregorian Sep 2012 #18
Excellent point. speedoo Sep 2012 #33
Union, Justice, Tranquility, Welfare -- those are the key words. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #31
His job is simple - he only has 1% of the country to worry about. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #20
My job is not to worry about people who need food tk2kewl Sep 2012 #21
Hell I'm well into the 53% and I don't think he gives a shit about me either dmallind Sep 2012 #22
I wonder if he thought this way when he signed Romneycare? Redfairen Sep 2012 #23
Welcome to DU! Mad_Dem_X Sep 2012 #35
I'd also put the whole "It'd be easier if I was Latino" right up there Lucy Goosey Sep 2012 #25
Queen Anne, "You People"; King Mitt, "These People" Let them eat kuchen SaveAmerica Sep 2012 #27
The tragedy is DonCoquixote Sep 2012 #30
"My job is not to worry about these people" dovetails nicely with Thegonagle Sep 2012 #32

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. That--and "they'll never take personal responsibility"--what a horrible condemnation of
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:10 PM
Sep 2012

half of America. The entire bottom half, income-wise. If anyone votes for this man, he or she must be: a member of the 1%, a racist, or a complete moron.

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
5. Strictly speaking, I think he meant his "job" as candidate.
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:10 PM
Sep 2012

But does anyone really think he'd turn around and "worry" about us as president? I certainly don't.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
10. That was his explanation
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:20 PM
Sep 2012

But I think it was more along the lines of a freudian slip he was trying to justify.

garybeck

(9,940 posts)
11. but does it really make a difference?
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:22 PM
Sep 2012

should his job as a candidate be really that much different than as president? Is he trying to say that while he's running he only worries about rich people but once he gets elected all of the sudden he's going to give a shit about poor people too?

makes no sense.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. That's exactly what he's trying to spin
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:53 PM
Sep 2012

When someone asked, he said that when he made those remarks, he was talking about the "process of running for president" as opposed to being president.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
24. It's a ridiculous effort
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:06 PM
Sep 2012

Did you see the footage? He was stuttering and searching for words. It was deer in the headlights spin. I'm looking forward to the book about this pathetic campaign and insider assessment of the candidate.
I won't declare victory until I see 270 on the screen, but this is pretty devastating.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
19. Spin it all you want, sis
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:00 PM
Sep 2012

What Mitt means is that there are two Americas.
His kind and the other 47% of Americans.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
26. It's generous to group him with 53%
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:11 PM
Sep 2012

If there is any hope for humanity he is among a significant minority of haters.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
7. I frame it, 'Romney isn't worried about injured war vets, seniors, children, and the disabled.' n/t
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:14 PM
Sep 2012

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
34. That should be hungry children
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 03:06 PM
Sep 2012

Only a heartless, soulless creep would say that the children of that 47% are mooching for food.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
9. The contrast is astounding on so many levels
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:18 PM
Sep 2012

"There is not a liberal America and a conservative America. There's the United States of America."

He is challenging the speech that launched Obama. The dem leaning "independent voters" fell in love with him.

DawgHouse

(4,019 posts)
12. I wish I were a fly on the wall
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:25 PM
Sep 2012

I wish I were a fly on the wall when My President heard what Mitt said.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
13. We the People
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:33 PM
Sep 2012

of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,


promote the general Welfare,



and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
18. I don't see how he can uphold the Constitution with his neglect of the 47%.
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 12:59 PM
Sep 2012

In fact, he can't take the oath of office with this kind of context, I believe.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
31. Union, Justice, Tranquility, Welfare -- those are the key words.
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:58 PM
Sep 2012

Romney's ideology does not value any of them.

He is for Division, Injustice, Second Amendment Solutions, and Letting the Middle Class and Poor.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
22. Hell I'm well into the 53% and I don't think he gives a shit about me either
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:28 PM
Sep 2012

Paid about 25k in federal income taxes last year. Sounds like a lot to those who pay none I am sure, but I'm under not the slightest illusion that he cares about those in my financial situation any more than the 47%. If you pay that in income taxes a month then maybe just maybe he'll be able to remember and care about when he was that "poor".

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
23. I wonder if he thought this way when he signed Romneycare?
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 01:31 PM
Sep 2012

It seems to me that the reason you'd create Romneycare in the first place would be to do something for the lower half of earners who "don't pay taxes." I don't know if I've seen someone stake his whole future on disavowing his own legacy. It's one-of-kind spin.

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
25. I'd also put the whole "It'd be easier if I was Latino" right up there
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:08 PM
Sep 2012

Especially given how hard he's been trying to woo "those people."

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
30. The tragedy is
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 02:56 PM
Sep 2012

The reason many people are reluctantly voting for Obama is because Obama cared so much about what people other than his base thought. While we would not screw over the average citizen, I hope to see the election where the right wingers get a good, unsweetened taste of their own medicine. If the right wing hates Obama, I would love to see what a Liz Warren or Julian Castro, or even...a Howard Dean would do.

Thegonagle

(806 posts)
32. "My job is not to worry about these people" dovetails nicely with
Tue Sep 18, 2012, 03:04 PM
Sep 2012

"I'm not concerned about the very poor," which was in a clip from January or February.

The difference is he was being recorded and added "we have a safety net there, if it needs repair, I'll fix it."

He won't repair a thing. He doesn't really give a damn either way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The real blunder in Romne...