Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:18 PM Dec 2011

Judge OKs Tattoo as a Bar to Employment

Judge OKs Tattoo as a Bar to Employment

SCRANTON, Pa. (CN) - A federal judge put the kibosh on a lawsuit from a would-be liquor control officer who said the Pennsylvania State Police's unconstitutional anti-tattoo policy prevented him from getting the job.

Granting summary judgment for the police, U.S. District Judge A. Richard Caputo approved the agency's tattoo policy, which bars workers from sporting ink that is "inappropriate; demean[s] the image or reputation of the PSP; or prevent[s] undercover work."

Plaintiff Ronald Scavone challenged that policy in an August 2009 complaint, asking that "the court declare the invasive tattoo removal policy unconstitutional." He claimed his First Amendment rights were violated when he was denied the job.

Scavone claimed he "successful[ly] completed the selection process and background check to be employed" with PSP as a liquor enforcement officer trainee, but "was not hired in the position because of ... a violation of his constitutional rights that he must physically alter his body by way of having a tattoo removed to be allowed employment with the government."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/13/42186.htm

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge OKs Tattoo as a Bar to Employment (Original Post) The Straight Story Dec 2011 OP
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #1
Watch it. That's probably my wife! n/t JackintheGreen Dec 2011 #4
it doesn't state where it is on his body. Quantess Dec 2011 #2
Racist and gang tattoos are a bar to military enlistment Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2011 #3
Facial or hand tattoos 41mag Dec 2011 #5
I know a couple of traffic cops SecurityManager Dec 2011 #6

Response to The Straight Story (Original post)

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
2. it doesn't state where it is on his body.
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:25 PM
Dec 2011

I would think if he keeps it covered, it's irrelevant, or the same as not having any.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
3. Racist and gang tattoos are a bar to military enlistment
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:25 PM
Dec 2011

And that makes perfect sense to me. Just because your have a right to deface your face doesn't mean people have to give you a job to congratulate your less-than-thoughtful endeavours.

 

41mag

(31 posts)
5. Facial or hand tattoos
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 10:10 PM
Dec 2011

should be a bar to certain employment. if you must tattoo your face to look like a tiger, expect to work in a carnival. I have some from when I was young and dumb, wish I didn't. Unfortunately you see a lot of poor young people struggling with bills sporting brand new tattoos. All I can do is shake my head and wonder why they would spend money on something as unnecessary. And mark me down as old and out of it, but I do not like seeing tattoos on women. There, I said it, go ahead and flame away.

SecurityManager

(124 posts)
6. I know a couple of traffic cops
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 10:16 PM
Dec 2011


They both wear these during the 'short sleeve' seasons but both have told me undercover would never be a future promotion due to the tattoos.

What about the girl in my starbucks every morning with the sterling silver bolt in her nose??????


LOL
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge OKs Tattoo as a Bar...