HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » So , when am I allowed to...

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:41 AM

 

So , when am I allowed to be offended?

Seems that worldwide only one group can be offended by free speech.

I thought I should be offended when 9/11 happened but I was wrong.

I thought I should be offended when Daniel Pearl was BEHEADED but I was wrong.

I thought I should be offended when these 4 Americans were killed when trying to good work but apparently I was wrong.

Nope , apparently I should offended because some nutcase makes a rediculous movie about Islam.

Maybe if he made a movie about Christians, Jews,Hindus or Buddhists then that's ok.

We haven't learned our lesson. We have to omit one group from any freedom of speech.

Because any slight will immediately lead to death and destruction.


And the best part is it appears that we have to guess what will set them off.


Maybe there is no slight...maybe any excuse to cause death and destruction is good enough and its just really about hate. I wonder why yesterday they attacked the German consulate...I guess any "western" consulate wil do.(can I be offended by that?)

So , since anything the west does can be perceived to cause people to be "offended" , I guess we should learn our lesson , that "don't upset us or we'll riot and occasionally kill your people."

Yes, with that kind of threat we should give up our freedom of speech.

138 replies, 6752 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 138 replies Author Time Post
Reply So , when am I allowed to be offended? (Original post)
zellie Sep 2012 OP
CJCRANE Sep 2012 #1
Odin2005 Sep 2012 #2
uppityperson Sep 2012 #3
zellie Sep 2012 #7
uppityperson Sep 2012 #9
zellie Sep 2012 #14
uppityperson Sep 2012 #24
treestar Sep 2012 #41
TBF Sep 2012 #51
malaise Sep 2012 #105
Whiskeytide Sep 2012 #126
uppityperson Sep 2012 #130
Whiskeytide Sep 2012 #133
uppityperson Sep 2012 #134
sarge43 Sep 2012 #37
hlthe2b Sep 2012 #102
bupkus Sep 2012 #4
proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #36
regnaD kciN Sep 2012 #91
Missycim Sep 2012 #124
zellie Sep 2012 #40
uppityperson Sep 2012 #42
sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #67
Melinda Sep 2012 #106
countryjake Sep 2012 #108
bupkus Sep 2012 #114
abelenkpe Sep 2012 #77
RandiFan1290 Sep 2012 #81
cali Sep 2012 #85
bupkus Sep 2012 #92
TransitJohn Sep 2012 #46
frylock Sep 2012 #59
Mnemosyne Sep 2012 #5
B2G Sep 2012 #21
Mnemosyne Sep 2012 #118
Autumn Sep 2012 #6
frylock Sep 2012 #64
BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #96
Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #8
countryjake Sep 2012 #109
nolabear Sep 2012 #10
bahrbearian Sep 2012 #82
Lint Head Sep 2012 #11
lunatica Sep 2012 #12
hedgehog Sep 2012 #76
Lex Sep 2012 #13
lonestarnot Sep 2012 #15
justiceischeap Sep 2012 #16
liberalmuse Sep 2012 #17
Scuba Sep 2012 #27
hughee99 Sep 2012 #33
MrDiaz Sep 2012 #48
frylock Sep 2012 #66
Zoeisright Sep 2012 #111
RandiFan1290 Sep 2012 #121
MrDiaz Sep 2012 #122
TBF Sep 2012 #55
Blue_In_AK Sep 2012 #97
Lex Sep 2012 #18
Avalux Sep 2012 #19
snooper2 Sep 2012 #26
fishwax Sep 2012 #20
Lex Sep 2012 #32
fishwax Sep 2012 #38
CJCRANE Sep 2012 #22
Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2012 #23
cali Sep 2012 #25
uppityperson Sep 2012 #30
Jennicut Sep 2012 #35
Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2012 #49
nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #28
Scootaloo Sep 2012 #29
Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #31
gulliver Sep 2012 #34
Moonwalk Sep 2012 #71
treestar Sep 2012 #39
proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #43
porphyrian Sep 2012 #44
zellie Sep 2012 #47
Walk away Sep 2012 #65
porphyrian Sep 2012 #69
sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #115
quaker bill Sep 2012 #45
ljm2002 Sep 2012 #50
TBF Sep 2012 #52
zellie Sep 2012 #57
TBF Sep 2012 #60
uppityperson Sep 2012 #61
zellie Sep 2012 #72
uppityperson Sep 2012 #84
zellie Sep 2012 #87
uppityperson Sep 2012 #89
DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #53
Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #54
TBF Sep 2012 #62
uppityperson Sep 2012 #68
TheKentuckian Sep 2012 #56
frylock Sep 2012 #58
Mz Pip Sep 2012 #63
zellie Sep 2012 #75
uppityperson Sep 2012 #86
Mz Pip Sep 2012 #99
gollygee Sep 2012 #100
fredamae Sep 2012 #70
Moonwalk Sep 2012 #73
abelenkpe Sep 2012 #74
julian09 Sep 2012 #93
patrice Sep 2012 #78
kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #79
JaneyVee Sep 2012 #80
arcane1 Sep 2012 #83
Tom Ripley Sep 2012 #88
Chorophyll Sep 2012 #90
Iggo Sep 2012 #94
slackmaster Sep 2012 #95
HiPointDem Sep 2012 #98
kolayamilya Sep 2012 #101
2on2u Sep 2012 #103
rbrnmw Sep 2012 #104
ibegurpard Sep 2012 #107
Zoeisright Sep 2012 #110
aint_no_life_nowhere Sep 2012 #112
RobertEarl Sep 2012 #113
jeff47 Sep 2012 #116
AnnieBW Sep 2012 #117
lapislzi Sep 2012 #129
GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #119
renie408 Sep 2012 #120
WinkyDink Sep 2012 #123
LanternWaste Sep 2012 #125
Dyedinthewoolliberal Sep 2012 #127
lapislzi Sep 2012 #128
Arugula Latte Sep 2012 #131
Solly Mack Sep 2012 #132
HangOnKids Sep 2012 #135
Tsiyu Sep 2012 #136
Jamastiene Sep 2012 #137
Skidmore Sep 2012 #138

Response to zellie (Original post)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:43 AM

1. A lot of people were offended by 9/11

Last edited Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:48 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

and Iraq, Afghanistan and Bin Laden suffered the consequences of that.

And the people who carried out the latest attacks will be brought to justice too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zellie (Original post)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:46 AM

2. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zellie (Original post)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:47 AM

3. How were you wrong to be offended by 9/11, Pearl's beheading, 4 killed Americans, etc? What is this

about? It seems to be a screed against "the muslims", against "them". Please clarify. Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uppityperson (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:52 AM

7. No , it's about freedom of speech.

 

nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zellie (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:53 AM

9. What? Were 9/11, Pearl's beheading, etc "freedom of speech"? Please clarify and use more words

to explain since I am not the only one wondering about this. Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uppityperson (Reply #9)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:57 AM

14. That has to do with whether other people

 

Last edited Sat Sep 15, 2012, 11:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

can be offended.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zellie (Reply #14)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:03 PM

24. I think you are saying we must be beware of "them", the muslims will get offended and kill

Americans. That "them", the muslims are the only people in the world to get a pass, that they can get offended by anything, riot and kill with impunity? Is this right? Still trying to understand what you mean.

Or do you mean 9/11 was "free speech" that for some reason you can not be offended by?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uppityperson (Reply #24)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:25 PM

41. Bet OP sees no reason for anyone if Afghanistan

to have a right to be offended by being attacked by drones.

This kind of thing perpetuates it all. The Israeli/Muslim exchange of offense seems like it will go on forever.

Though when they were able to settle things in Northern Ireland, it gave hope. People need to quit this back and forth, being the victim and only retaliating and trying to convince us the other side is evil while they are good. It's getting offensive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to treestar (Reply #41)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 12:42 PM

51. "Getting" offensive? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to treestar (Reply #41)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 03:52 PM

105. Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Their (those nasty brown Muslims) deaths don't count

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uppityperson (Reply #9)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 10:52 AM

126. I don't really want to get involved in this fight...

... but I think a pretty good argument can be made that the people who carried out 9/11, Pearl's televised murder, etc... did, in fact, intend a message to be conveyed by their actions. Such events are seldom about actually killing the people killed. They are much more about the impact on those that witness the killing.

That probably makes it "speech" from their perspective, however irrational and barbaric our culture may find it to be. So I think the OP has made a legitimate comparison, even if the point may be a little less clear.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink