General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsglacierbay
(2,477 posts)but that's not the intent, the intent was to name the combat helicopter's after great warrior tribes. Noam Chomsky is technically correct, but at the same time he is wrong about how the choppers are named.
We name our Aircraft Carriers after former Presidents, our missile subs after states, our H/K subs after cities. and so on and so forth.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Those "were" the names of warrior tribes. Why? Because wholesale genocide of First nations has been the US's policy since it's inception.
Trail of Tears is an excellent example.
don't jump all over me, I didn't make the policy, I'm only explaining it.
I never said I agreed with it.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)thought of yet. The cutthroat mentality necessary for europeans to live in such large numbers so close to each other hadn't been necessary for the native tribes who populated North America. The europeans needed weapons to kill each other that took fairness and honor out of the equation. The natives of North America didn't need such dishonorable things. They had so much space that sooner or later every tribe knew Peace.
From my favorite Queen song:
Oh the red man knows wars
With his hands and his knives (I think this was actually "his mind"
On the Bible you swore
Fought your battle with lies
A simple, primitive culture were caught off guard by a culture who was already well versed in ways to kill other humans... and thought little of doing so if it meant gaining an inch of land. A culture who bred like roaches, and needed to find new places to live not ONLY because of their proximity to one another, but also for their propensity for turning weaker peoples into feudal slaves.
I don't care that white europeans use the tribal names of my ancestors to name their killing machines. Words are just words. I don't care because I know that if the europeans had shown up on these shores armed with the same weapons the First Nations had, they wouldn't have stood a snowball's chance in hell of surviving their first contact. The europeans would have continued sending boats, only to have the passengers on those boats subject to worse and worse punishments. The only reason they sent the boats in the first place is because they lacked the good sense to live in close proximity to each other without claiming the land each other lived on.
CALL your killing machine the Apache. Call your killing machine whatever you want... WE know your reason: You don't want to call your killing machine a "White European". It cheapens you somehow.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)on the shores of North America, the term "cannon fodder" would never have been coined. it would have been "arrow fodder" and the First Nations would have killed them on the run just as they did everything they had been eating for hundreds if not thousands of years.
I shit you not.
daleo
(21,317 posts)That's ugly language by anyone's standard.
Response to daleo (Reply #14)
Post removed
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)...as well. So I don't think the "cheapens" argument really holds water...
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)...and I'm not entirely sure what your overall point was with the statement (and can't confirm it since you've had a post hidden here, but feel free to message me if you want).
Are you suggesting that some of those folks may have had some native american blood? While this is indeed possible and is also very common (I am myself 1/16th Menominee), most still tend to identify with their more prominent European roots. Given that, my original point still has merit I believe.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)issued by the Paleface Occupation Government
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)Isn't that just a worthless slip of paper printed up by the murderous white hordes?
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)with two Native American friends, who practice their culture and speak their languages. The fight about "box checkers" got so heated that our professor dismissed the class for break. My friends are both "full-blooded" Native people, and the folks in Oklahoma who have a drop-according to my friends' beliefs- but get benefits anyway, infuriated them.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)I seem to remember from history that the native peoples of the americas were pretty good at killing each other and slavery wasnt a new concept to them. All peoples have good and bad to believe otherwise is naive.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)It was the smallpox that really led to their demise.
Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)The AH-1 White European? Indian tribes have way cooler names. I hope you don't want us to rename our rivers to stuff like "New Thames"
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)so moving, the truth
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Sorry, but if anybody here claimed any other ethnic group other than white Europeans "breed like roaches," I think they'd end up PPR'ed. There could have been a very moving piece in there, but the bigotry tarnished it.
Iggo
(47,535 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)anger is an appropriate response to genocide
imo
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Things would have turned out a little different.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Doesn't it have many uses - and that includes defending all of us from outside enemies. Some administration misuse our military power, but that doesn't mean we don't need any of it at all.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)glacierbay
(2,477 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)They are mainly used far from our shores in other countries. We mostly make our own "outside enemies". It is a stretch to say we are defending this country, when we are the uninvited invaders in their country.
</war>
Iggo
(47,535 posts)Because that's what it is.
It can be used for good or ill, but don't fool yourself about what it is. It's straight up killing machine.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Before the LA class, we named them after fish.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)What are they naming the Boomers after now?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)We probably won't name one until the next decade as there are none under construction right now.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)I heard a rumor that they are going to name one the U.S.S. Jimmy (James?) Carter, that would be appropriate as he did serve aboard an H/K sub, the U.S.S Promfret, SS 391.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23), the third and last Seawolf-class submarine, is the first ship of the United States Navy to be named for former President Jimmy Carter, who served in the United States Navy as a Communications Officer, Sonar Officer, Electronics Officer, Weapons Officer, and Supply Officer while on board the USS Pomfret (SS-391).[1] Jimmy Carter is one of the few ships of the United States Navy (and only the third submarine) to have been named for a person who was alive at the time of the ship's naming, and the first submarine to be named for a living former president; Jimmy Carter is the only U.S. President to qualify in submarines.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Kind of strange to think they named them after things people eat.
I heard accounts of people fishing for halibut and having to shoot them when they bring on board. They can be huge. I easily found several links, here is one:
http://alaska.org/fishing/advice-catch-halibut.htm
Gonna google to see if they ever named a ship after a dolphin, manatee or octopus.
I'd never thought of all of these systems or reasons for naming these military vessels and aircraft.
Learn new things every day here. Thanks.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)...Saratoga, Enterprise and Yorktown.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)USS Wasp (CV7)1941
USS Hornet (CV8) 1941
pa28
(6,145 posts)Chomsky is just pointing out the irony.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)who ever decided on the blackhawk name either never read the history or thought it was cool sounding name .
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)The only combat helo's I rode on were the UH-1B Huey and the CH-47 Chinook in Vietnam.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)at Fort Hood. The CH-47 Chinook is still serving, and doing a fine job.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Close.
Puregonzo1188
(1,948 posts)glacierbay
(2,477 posts)It's still a pretty cool chopper.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)disgusting if that was the intent!
eridani
(51,907 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)The "...who we wiped out" part wouldn't really have been on their mental radar at the time, I'd imagine.
TheMightyFavog
(13,770 posts)Sioux, Choctaw, Chinook, Shawnee, Chickasaw, Iroquois, Apache, Comanche, Blackhawk, Cayuse, Osage, Lakota, Mojave..
The hard part is naming Army helicopters that WEREN'T named after Native American tribes...
I can think of only one of the top of my head the Cobra
Angleae
(4,481 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:07 PM - Edit history (1)
TheMightyFavog
(13,770 posts)IIRC, the Army retired the Cobra in the 90s, I think after Haiti. The USMC, however still uses variants of the Cobra.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)The Sea Cobra.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)dflprincess
(28,072 posts)in WWII my dad's bomber group was called "The Air Apaches" and the logo was a profile of a Native American in a feathered headdress (which looks more Lakota to me).
rppper
(2,952 posts)The attack helo's....apache, Comanche, etc....formidable and armed to the teeth, able to sneak up on their foes and attack with ferocity....
The chinook, Iroquois, etc....multi role helos...designed to multi task...rescue the injured, move items efficiently and quickly...
These names were meant to honor what the military saw as fierce, brave warriors who fought against them...it's kind of a twisted honor in their eyes, although I can understand where this could cause some degree of consternation....
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Did Chomsky even bother to ask their opinion?
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)without first consulting with the Apache & Comanche people?
That doesn't seem logical.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, if so, they can leave the names.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)I'm no fan of war by any stretch of the imagination, but nor am I in favor of total disarmament either.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Just what are they being used in Afghanistan for? Waging peace?
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)they're used for convoy escort, protection of U.S. troops, protection of NATO troops, they're great for quick reaction units.
I don't like the fact that we're still in Afghanistan but as long as we're still there, I want the best weapons systems and technology that we have to protect our troops and theirs nothing like seeing an Apache Helicopter Gunship overhead to put the fear into someone bent on attacking our troops.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)It's fascinating to hear everyone say they're against war but justify the killing.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)All I want is the best weapons system, and you can't beat an Apache gunship for that, for our troops until they leave which I hope is in the near future.
Why disarm them?
They were designed to be armed, I see no reason to deviate from what they're designed to do.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)That doesn't mean I think war is never necessary. It's a terrible thing, but at times unavoidable.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)It's all very nice to say "it's" necessary to go to war" but try it with "I" or "me". Or, try "everybody". "Sometimes it's necessary for everybody to go to war." "Sometimes it's necessary for my kids to go war." How about you mom?
The fact of the matter is that most people don't think it's "necessary" to go to war if it involves them. Most of the people of the world never experience war and never have and seem to get along pretty good without that "necessity".
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, 1861? Or, 1775? Or, 1914? Or, 1964? Or, all of the other wars, incursions, and other metaphors for killing other people?
As for 1941. I don't know if it was "necessary".
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Than a europe under the himmler or beria plan so yeah i think it was a good thing
DemocratsForProgress
(545 posts)that suggests that your opinions on both war and peace are not really worth reading.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)1775, 1861, 1941
If you're "uncertain" about it, your opinion isn't worth listening to.
And would "I" have gone? Damn right I would have.
EX500rider
(10,810 posts)2001... Taliban sheltering the perpetrators of 9/11 is a cause for war....necessary is a matter of opinion
1861...worth freeing the slave and preserving the union
1775....worth our independence
1914...worth the German Imperial Empire not taking over all of Europe + the sinking of the Lusitania killed US citizens
1964...not so much although taking sides in the Cold War not surprising
1941....yes, Japan started a war with us and stopping the Nazi's certainly worthwhile
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)Unfuckinbelievable. You don't think stopping the holocaust, stopping Germany, Japan, Italy from dominating the world and imposing tyranny was worthwhile?
Then this conversation is done.
2on2u
(1,843 posts)Not to mention dropping water on drought driven wildfires.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)They were built for a specific reason and mission, why de-fang them? You may not like what their purpose is but we do need those in our arsenal.
And they are used for other purposes, the Blackhawks and Chinooks are great for delivering aid to those in disaster areas, evacuations, delivering personal to places inaccessible to fixed wing aircraft.
They're very versatile aircraft.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)glacierbay
(2,477 posts)but the escort gunships do to protect the cargo helos. There's nothing like seeing an Apache escorting or flying in circles to protect the helos on the ground to dissuade anyone from attacking them.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Do you have any experience with military disaster and civil relief efforts? Or do you just not watch international news... ever?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army, Air Force and Navy.
MH-53J/M (Pave Low), CH-35D (Sea Stallion) and CH-53E (Super Stallion) helicopters, used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy.
CH-47 (Chinook), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army.
UH-46 (Sea Knight), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Marine Corps.
UH-1 (Iroquois), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army, Air Force and Marine Corps.
UH-72 (Lakota), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army.
Note that all of these aircraft can be armed or unarmed, and all have civilian varients used for a variety of purposes.
Next time, I suggest you do 5 minutes of internet searches before proudly displaying your ignorance with such a profound sense of moral superiority.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)aren't those the ones the AF uses to insert and extract Special Forces, and rescue downed pilots behind enemy lines?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)due to the aircrafts' adverse-weather capability and the extreme competence of their crews.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is not a put down of any kind. I think it plays into right wing hands when we carry victimization memes too far.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)It was meant to acknowledge the warrior spirit of the Native American culture. And you're right, sometimes we do carry the victimization too far. I would imagine, by the lack of protest from the Native American population, that they have no problem with this.
sarge43
(28,940 posts)Fitting the air cavs carrying their names.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)During WW2, although not an aviation unit, but Native Americans served honorably as the Wind Talkers with the U.S. Marines.
The movie, Wind Talkers, was an awesome, inspiring movie.
daleo
(21,317 posts)In the Canadian army as well, in both world wars. A very interesting novel on this subject is Three Day Road, well worth reading.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)fallen enemies, and act aggressively out of a feeling of cultural inferiority. To appropriate their names makes us feel mighty, as if we ate their brave hearts.
Genocide is rooted in religious rituals, and vis-a-versa.
...it could be that it was requested by the tribes. But trying to verify that.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Eat me, please.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)From this site on helicopter history:
I'm currently attempting to corroborate this information (though my search will have to way for later tonight, as i have to get ready for work), but if it is in fact true, then Mr. Chomsky (EDIT: And a certain poster up thread) would appear to have stepped in it just a tad and owes the Army an apology.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I guess that would be acceptable if true. Or would it still be insulting and why?
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)No people are monolithic when it comes to being insulted.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)But still, I'm gonna research this subject some more tonight when I get home from work. I never like to rely in a single source.
But even if it is true, your point still stands
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)During WWII the 101st Airborne Division's 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment sought the permission and began using a profile of Geronimo with lightning bolts on its patch. For its regimental crest, the 501st adopted the image of a stylized thunderbird above the 'Geronimo' motto:
The regiment's troops were known as "the Geronimos," something that continued through the VN War and probably to this day (even though the two 501st battalions that remained with the 101st in VN were deactivated after that war, then reactivated for GWOT as part of a different unit.
I've seen reports of tribal leaders participating in the dedicaion ceremonies for helicopters that use tribal names. The names also have to get a lot of approvals, including from the U.S. Patent Office, before adoption:
The Commanding General (CG) of the U.S. Army Aviation Missile Command (AMCOM), located at Redstone Arsenal, near Huntsville, Alabama, had the responsibility of initiating action to select a popular name for an Army aircraft. For this purpose, the CG maintained a list of possible names obtained from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. For brevity the names usually consisted of only one word. When a new aircraft reached the production stage, or immediately before it went into production, the CG selected five possible names. The selection decision was based on the sound, the history, and the relationship of the name to the mission of the aircraft.
The names chosen had to appeal to the imagination, without sacrificing dignity, and suggest an aggressive spirit and confidence in the capabilities of the aircraft. They also had to suggest mobility, firepower and endurance. The chosen names were sent to the Trade Mark () Division of the U.S. Patent Office to determine if there was any legal objection to their use.
...
After approval by the Patent Office, the five names were sent to the Chief of Research and Development, Department of the Army, with a short justification for each. From these five, the Chief of Research and Development would select one.
The approved name then went to the Aeronautical Systems Division, Directorate of Engineering Standards, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. This Department of Defense unit had the responsibility of officially registering the names of all aircraft used by the U.S. military. It also maintained and printed a list of the names in a publication entitled "Model Designation of Military Aircraft, Rockets and Guided Missiles."
http://www.chinook-helicopter.com/origins/origins.html
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Ive seen the geronimo badge in a photo here somewhere though i cant remember who or whee. Kinda interesting
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:47 AM - Edit history (1)
I served with 2/501 Infantry in VN and I've posted the regimental crest both in discussions with other vets here and in last year's threads about the codenames used in the Bin Laden mission.
In the latter discussions I posted some of the history of the insignia and how they all came about because a few paratroopers went to see a movie and were inspired to cry, "Geronimo!" on their next jump.
It was only last year that I linked up with one of the guys from the unit who sent me a photo of us in VN, with a crude rendering of the 'Geronimo' crest on the wall behind us:
The officers of Bravo Co, 2/501 Infantry, 101st Airborne Division, Vietnam - Thanksgiving, 1969
Rear, l to r: Russ Shields, platoon leader (KIA), and our Captain (Company Commander)
Front, l to r: Mark Rivest, platoon leader (KIA), pinboy3niner, platoon leader, and Dan, Executive Officer, holding cup.
I thought the history of the insignia for the unit was interesting, especially because in this case it came from the bottom up, and not from the top down.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... was an interesting movie about the adaption of the Vietnam era Cobra attack helicopter adapted to police use. The movie turned out to be a statement against the militarization of the police that was way ahead of it's time. I won't give the spoiler in case anyone wants to watch it.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... agree the t.v. series was awful. If you like helicopters, you will probably enjoy the movie.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:19 PM - Edit history (1)
yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... I can think of is our very own Tammy Duckworth!!!
The only woman in American History to win the Medal of honor was in the Civil War...
'There's no need to see flowers any other way,
than the way they've always been seen"