Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
118 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We still name our helicopter gunships after victims of genocide (Original Post) eridani Sep 2012 OP
It may seem that way glacierbay Sep 2012 #1
LOL. Is that a smackdown of Jews and Gypsies? Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #2
Hey glacierbay Sep 2012 #4
The Europeans came to this continent armed with weapons and deceptions my ancestors hadn't cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #11
Interesting perspective. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #13
If the europeans hadn't found more effective ways of killing each other long before landing cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #16
Bred like roaches? daleo Sep 2012 #14
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #20
well i guess if its onlly white europeans that get upset then its okay unreal loli phabay Sep 2012 #24
Not to disrespect, but we do name plenty of "killing machines" after people of European ancestry... eqfan592 Sep 2012 #15
Yeah well, I'd bet you don't have a CDIB. n/t cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #22
I didn't realize that it would be required for a discussion on the topic... eqfan592 Sep 2012 #27
cdib i have no idea what that even means loli phabay Sep 2012 #29
Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood Glaug-Eldare Sep 2012 #33
okay thanks never heard of it before. loli phabay Sep 2012 #89
What do you want with CDIB? Glaug-Eldare Sep 2012 #32
I remember sitting in a grad seminar... a la izquierda Sep 2012 #98
shrrman bradley abrams then the carriers your point is well made. loli phabay Sep 2012 #25
Thanks. :) (nt) eqfan592 Sep 2012 #26
bred like roaches really i mean really loli phabay Sep 2012 #17
The Cherokees held slaves, so the guilt trip rings false: friendly_iconoclast Sep 2012 #90
As I understand it, Native Americans did fine against European weapons... Hippo_Tron Sep 2012 #21
That would just sound stupid. Glaug-Eldare Sep 2012 #31
THIS. This should be an OP elehhhhna Sep 2012 #39
Moving? eqfan592 Sep 2012 #41
How about bred like fluffy bunnies? Iggo Sep 2012 #78
good one, iggo. elehhhhna Sep 2012 #114
harsh analogy, yes elehhhhna Sep 2012 #113
I think if the natives in South America had not been wiped out by small pox.... WCGreen Sep 2012 #53
Why are you calling it a "killing machine?" treestar Sep 2012 #55
Well said. (nt) eqfan592 Sep 2012 #56
+10000 glacierbay Sep 2012 #58
They are killing machines. That is their design. RC Sep 2012 #104
Why call an attack helicopter a killing machine? Iggo Sep 2012 #116
I wouldn't be so quick to condemn slaveholders if I were you- Mote, meet beam: friendly_iconoclast Sep 2012 #88
I'd heard of tribes keeping prisoners of war, but nothing so organized as this. That was some read. freshwest Sep 2012 #96
We are naming our latest H/K subs after states. NutmegYankee Sep 2012 #9
Is that the Virginia Class? glacierbay Sep 2012 #35
We haven't built a boomer in nearly 2 decades. NutmegYankee Sep 2012 #62
I'm curious to see what they will name the new ones after glacierbay Sep 2012 #66
reality tv we will have the snooki the honey boo boo etf etc loli phabay Sep 2012 #72
We already have a SEAWOLF Class sub named after Carter NutmegYankee Sep 2012 #109
What kind of fish? Shark, barracuda? Not salmon or trout, I'll bet. freshwest Sep 2012 #97
Actually, we named ships after both salmon and trout. NutmegYankee Sep 2012 #108
Hey, I would have thought they'd only go for 'aggressive' species. Although, salmon are tough. freshwest Sep 2012 #110
Ah, sure enough, they did! Just not my image of this. Interesting stuff on this thread, freshwest Sep 2012 #111
I miss the old days when we named our ACC's names like... eqfan592 Sep 2012 #10
Don't forget Hornet and Wasp. oneshooter Sep 2012 #84
You are right. Those names were intended to be honorific. pa28 Sep 2012 #23
blackhawk was a dumb ass who led his tribe to starvation madrchsod Sep 2012 #3
Still a pretty cool chopper. glacierbay Sep 2012 #7
The last active UH-1B Hueys were retired two weeks ago oneshooter Sep 2012 #8
i love the sound a chinook makes even now i always know when one of them is flying loli phabay Sep 2012 #19
It's only a cool chopper if you're not Iraqi or Vietnamese. Puregonzo1188 Sep 2012 #40
Whatever glacierbay Sep 2012 #42
Fuck... it does seem that way fascisthunter Sep 2012 #5
I doubt it--probably never even occurred to the decisionmakers n/t eridani Sep 2012 #6
They were definitely going for the "powerful warrior people" vibe instead Posteritatis Sep 2012 #18
Hasn't the Army they been naming helicopters after Native American Tribes since the 50s? TheMightyFavog Sep 2012 #12
Keep trying, Cobras are Marine Corps not army. Angleae Sep 2012 #34
The Cobra used to be used by the Army before the development of the Apache. TheMightyFavog Sep 2012 #37
Yes they do glacierbay Sep 2012 #43
That is spelled "Marine Corps" oneshooter Sep 2012 #85
Sorry Angleae Sep 2012 #105
Not just used for hardware dflprincess Sep 2012 #28
Here's a perspective.... rppper Sep 2012 #30
What do the Apache & Conamche people have to say about it? baldguy Sep 2012 #36
Is it wrong of Chomsky to offer an opinion on this issue ronnie624 Sep 2012 #80
Given what his opinion is, it may have been a smart thing to do. (n t) eqfan592 Sep 2012 #83
I'd rather see them disarmed and used for something worthwhile. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #38
I think they are already used for something worthwhile. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #44
Well, that's nice. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #45
No glacierbay Sep 2012 #47
How about we just down/disarm them and leave? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #49
Who's justifying the killing? glacierbay Sep 2012 #51
I said I'm no fan of war. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #52
Has it ever been "necessary" for you to go to war? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #79
Would you agree going to war in 1941 was necessary? glacierbay Sep 2012 #82
Wouild you agree that it was necessary to go to war in 2001? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #87
i would say that id prefer to live in a europe after the marshal plan loli phabay Sep 2012 #92
If you're uncertain about whether it was necessary to go to war in 1941 DemocratsForProgress Sep 2012 #99
I'll second what demosforprogress has to say Confusious Sep 2012 #103
Hmmmm...yes to most of those EX500rider Sep 2012 #115
You don't know if WW2 was necessary? glacierbay Sep 2012 #117
With the caps melting, soon enough the only thing they will be doing is this. 2on2u Sep 2012 #59
Disarm them? Why? glacierbay Sep 2012 #46
Fine. Do they need to be armed to work in disaster areas? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #48
The cargo helos don't need to be glacierbay Sep 2012 #50
Depends on the disaster area. PavePusher Sep 2012 #77
UH-60 (Black Hawk), HH-60 (Pave Hawk) and SH-60 (Sea Hawk) helicopters... PavePusher Sep 2012 #75
Pave Hawks glacierbay Sep 2012 #76
Yes. Also used for rescue work, often in Alaska and Washington areas... PavePusher Sep 2012 #81
IMO it is intended as a compliment treestar Sep 2012 #54
It's definitely a compliment glacierbay Sep 2012 #57
Moreover, some of the Nations created the finest light cavalry forces in the world sarge43 Sep 2012 #61
And lest we forget glacierbay Sep 2012 #67
They served in all kinds of capacities daleo Sep 2012 #86
Anthrologist Rene Girard termed it, "mimetic envy." People cannabilize the identities of leveymg Sep 2012 #60
Or... eqfan592 Sep 2012 #65
Do you really believe the tribes wrote the U.S. Army, "Please eat our names?" leveymg Sep 2012 #68
See post 64. ;) (nt) eqfan592 Sep 2012 #69
Stranger things have happened. Granted. ;-) leveymg Sep 2012 #70
The USNS Red Cloud and the USNS Sacagawea are insults now??? I bet ol' Noam msanthrope Sep 2012 #63
Goodness, that's interesting: freshwest Sep 2012 #100
Some interesting background that I found on this. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #64
So the naming was intended to honor those First Nation people? Cleita Sep 2012 #91
i think it would come down to the individual and how they look at it loli phabay Sep 2012 #93
This it's true. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #94
A U.S. Infantry regiment got permission from Geronimo's descendants to use his name and likeness pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #95
i think there is a duer who was member of this unit loli phabay Sep 2012 #101
It's nice to be remembered. :) pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #107
yup thats the picture i saw loli phabay Sep 2012 #112
"Blue Thunder" warrprayer Sep 2012 #71
i will spoil for goodness sake dont watch it its awful ;) loli phabay Sep 2012 #73
I mean the original movie warrprayer Sep 2012 #74
" Two Anne Franks crashed in the Afghanistan yesterday " orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #102
hyperbole. eom yawnmaster Sep 2012 #106
The Greatest Helicopter Pilot warrprayer Sep 2012 #118
 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
1. It may seem that way
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:07 PM
Sep 2012

but that's not the intent, the intent was to name the combat helicopter's after great warrior tribes. Noam Chomsky is technically correct, but at the same time he is wrong about how the choppers are named.

We name our Aircraft Carriers after former Presidents, our missile subs after states, our H/K subs after cities. and so on and so forth.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
2. LOL. Is that a smackdown of Jews and Gypsies?
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:20 PM
Sep 2012

Those "were" the names of warrior tribes. Why? Because wholesale genocide of First nations has been the US's policy since it's inception.

Trail of Tears is an excellent example.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
4. Hey
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:28 PM
Sep 2012

don't jump all over me, I didn't make the policy, I'm only explaining it.
I never said I agreed with it.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
11. The Europeans came to this continent armed with weapons and deceptions my ancestors hadn't
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:03 PM
Sep 2012

thought of yet. The cutthroat mentality necessary for europeans to live in such large numbers so close to each other hadn't been necessary for the native tribes who populated North America. The europeans needed weapons to kill each other that took fairness and honor out of the equation. The natives of North America didn't need such dishonorable things. They had so much space that sooner or later every tribe knew Peace.

From my favorite Queen song:

Oh the red man knows wars
With his hands and his knives (I think this was actually "his mind&quot
On the Bible you swore
Fought your battle with lies

A simple, primitive culture were caught off guard by a culture who was already well versed in ways to kill other humans... and thought little of doing so if it meant gaining an inch of land. A culture who bred like roaches, and needed to find new places to live not ONLY because of their proximity to one another, but also for their propensity for turning weaker peoples into feudal slaves.

I don't care that white europeans use the tribal names of my ancestors to name their killing machines. Words are just words. I don't care because I know that if the europeans had shown up on these shores armed with the same weapons the First Nations had, they wouldn't have stood a snowball's chance in hell of surviving their first contact. The europeans would have continued sending boats, only to have the passengers on those boats subject to worse and worse punishments. The only reason they sent the boats in the first place is because they lacked the good sense to live in close proximity to each other without claiming the land each other lived on.

CALL your killing machine the Apache. Call your killing machine whatever you want... WE know your reason: You don't want to call your killing machine a "White European". It cheapens you somehow.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
16. If the europeans hadn't found more effective ways of killing each other long before landing
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:40 PM
Sep 2012

on the shores of North America, the term "cannon fodder" would never have been coined. it would have been "arrow fodder" and the First Nations would have killed them on the run just as they did everything they had been eating for hundreds if not thousands of years.

I shit you not.

Response to daleo (Reply #14)

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
15. Not to disrespect, but we do name plenty of "killing machines" after people of European ancestry...
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:39 PM
Sep 2012

...as well. So I don't think the "cheapens" argument really holds water...

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
27. I didn't realize that it would be required for a discussion on the topic...
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:02 AM
Sep 2012

...and I'm not entirely sure what your overall point was with the statement (and can't confirm it since you've had a post hidden here, but feel free to message me if you want).

Are you suggesting that some of those folks may have had some native american blood? While this is indeed possible and is also very common (I am myself 1/16th Menominee), most still tend to identify with their more prominent European roots. Given that, my original point still has merit I believe.

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
32. What do you want with CDIB?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:22 AM
Sep 2012

Isn't that just a worthless slip of paper printed up by the murderous white hordes?

a la izquierda

(11,791 posts)
98. I remember sitting in a grad seminar...
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:41 PM
Sep 2012

with two Native American friends, who practice their culture and speak their languages. The fight about "box checkers" got so heated that our professor dismissed the class for break. My friends are both "full-blooded" Native people, and the folks in Oklahoma who have a drop-according to my friends' beliefs- but get benefits anyway, infuriated them.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
17. bred like roaches really i mean really
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:41 PM
Sep 2012

I seem to remember from history that the native peoples of the americas were pretty good at killing each other and slavery wasnt a new concept to them. All peoples have good and bad to believe otherwise is naive.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
21. As I understand it, Native Americans did fine against European weapons...
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:48 PM
Sep 2012

It was the smallpox that really led to their demise.

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
31. That would just sound stupid.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:19 AM
Sep 2012

The AH-1 White European? Indian tribes have way cooler names. I hope you don't want us to rename our rivers to stuff like "New Thames"

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
41. Moving?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:46 AM
Sep 2012

Sorry, but if anybody here claimed any other ethnic group other than white Europeans "breed like roaches," I think they'd end up PPR'ed. There could have been a very moving piece in there, but the bigotry tarnished it.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
53. I think if the natives in South America had not been wiped out by small pox....
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:45 PM
Sep 2012

Things would have turned out a little different.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
55. Why are you calling it a "killing machine?"
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:51 PM
Sep 2012

Doesn't it have many uses - and that includes defending all of us from outside enemies. Some administration misuse our military power, but that doesn't mean we don't need any of it at all.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
104. They are killing machines. That is their design.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 05:40 PM
Sep 2012

They are mainly used far from our shores in other countries. We mostly make our own "outside enemies". It is a stretch to say we are defending this country, when we are the uninvited invaders in their country.

</war>

Iggo

(47,535 posts)
116. Why call an attack helicopter a killing machine?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:53 PM
Sep 2012

Because that's what it is.

It can be used for good or ill, but don't fool yourself about what it is. It's straight up killing machine.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
62. We haven't built a boomer in nearly 2 decades.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:01 PM
Sep 2012

We probably won't name one until the next decade as there are none under construction right now.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
66. I'm curious to see what they will name the new ones after
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:13 PM
Sep 2012

I heard a rumor that they are going to name one the U.S.S. Jimmy (James?) Carter, that would be appropriate as he did serve aboard an H/K sub, the U.S.S Promfret, SS 391.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
109. We already have a SEAWOLF Class sub named after Carter
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:32 PM
Sep 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_Carter_%28SSN-23%29

USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23), the third and last Seawolf-class submarine, is the first ship of the United States Navy to be named for former President Jimmy Carter, who served in the United States Navy as a Communications Officer, Sonar Officer, Electronics Officer, Weapons Officer, and Supply Officer while on board the USS Pomfret (SS-391).[1] Jimmy Carter is one of the few ships of the United States Navy (and only the third submarine) to have been named for a person who was alive at the time of the ship's naming, and the first submarine to be named for a living former president; Jimmy Carter is the only U.S. President to qualify in submarines.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
110. Hey, I would have thought they'd only go for 'aggressive' species. Although, salmon are tough.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 07:04 PM
Sep 2012

Kind of strange to think they named them after things people eat.

I heard accounts of people fishing for halibut and having to shoot them when they bring on board. They can be huge. I easily found several links, here is one:

http://alaska.org/fishing/advice-catch-halibut.htm

Gonna google to see if they ever named a ship after a dolphin, manatee or octopus.

I'd never thought of all of these systems or reasons for naming these military vessels and aircraft.

Learn new things every day here. Thanks.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
3. blackhawk was a dumb ass who led his tribe to starvation
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:22 PM
Sep 2012

who ever decided on the blackhawk name either never read the history or thought it was cool sounding name .

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
7. Still a pretty cool chopper.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:36 PM
Sep 2012

The only combat helo's I rode on were the UH-1B Huey and the CH-47 Chinook in Vietnam.


oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
8. The last active UH-1B Hueys were retired two weeks ago
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 10:18 PM
Sep 2012

at Fort Hood. The CH-47 Chinook is still serving, and doing a fine job.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
18. They were definitely going for the "powerful warrior people" vibe instead
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:42 PM
Sep 2012

The "...who we wiped out" part wouldn't really have been on their mental radar at the time, I'd imagine.

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
12. Hasn't the Army they been naming helicopters after Native American Tribes since the 50s?
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:21 PM
Sep 2012

Sioux, Choctaw, Chinook, Shawnee, Chickasaw, Iroquois, Apache, Comanche, Blackhawk, Cayuse, Osage, Lakota, Mojave..

The hard part is naming Army helicopters that WEREN'T named after Native American tribes...

I can think of only one of the top of my head the Cobra

TheMightyFavog

(13,770 posts)
37. The Cobra used to be used by the Army before the development of the Apache.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:15 AM
Sep 2012

IIRC, the Army retired the Cobra in the 90s, I think after Haiti. The USMC, however still uses variants of the Cobra.

dflprincess

(28,072 posts)
28. Not just used for hardware
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:10 AM
Sep 2012

in WWII my dad's bomber group was called "The Air Apaches" and the logo was a profile of a Native American in a feathered headdress (which looks more Lakota to me).

rppper

(2,952 posts)
30. Here's a perspective....
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:34 AM
Sep 2012

The attack helo's....apache, Comanche, etc....formidable and armed to the teeth, able to sneak up on their foes and attack with ferocity....

The chinook, Iroquois, etc....multi role helos...designed to multi task...rescue the injured, move items efficiently and quickly...

These names were meant to honor what the military saw as fierce, brave warriors who fought against them...it's kind of a twisted honor in their eyes, although I can understand where this could cause some degree of consternation....

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
36. What do the Apache & Conamche people have to say about it?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 08:19 AM
Sep 2012

Did Chomsky even bother to ask their opinion?

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
80. Is it wrong of Chomsky to offer an opinion on this issue
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 02:10 PM
Sep 2012

without first consulting with the Apache & Comanche people?

That doesn't seem logical.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
44. I think they are already used for something worthwhile.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:55 AM
Sep 2012

I'm no fan of war by any stretch of the imagination, but nor am I in favor of total disarmament either.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
47. No
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:32 PM
Sep 2012

they're used for convoy escort, protection of U.S. troops, protection of NATO troops, they're great for quick reaction units.
I don't like the fact that we're still in Afghanistan but as long as we're still there, I want the best weapons systems and technology that we have to protect our troops and theirs nothing like seeing an Apache Helicopter Gunship overhead to put the fear into someone bent on attacking our troops.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
49. How about we just down/disarm them and leave?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:36 PM
Sep 2012

It's fascinating to hear everyone say they're against war but justify the killing.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
51. Who's justifying the killing?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:41 PM
Sep 2012

All I want is the best weapons system, and you can't beat an Apache gunship for that, for our troops until they leave which I hope is in the near future.
Why disarm them?
They were designed to be armed, I see no reason to deviate from what they're designed to do.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
52. I said I'm no fan of war.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:44 PM
Sep 2012

That doesn't mean I think war is never necessary. It's a terrible thing, but at times unavoidable.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
79. Has it ever been "necessary" for you to go to war?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 02:08 PM
Sep 2012

It's all very nice to say "it's" necessary to go to war" but try it with "I" or "me". Or, try "everybody". "Sometimes it's necessary for everybody to go to war." "Sometimes it's necessary for my kids to go war." How about you mom?

The fact of the matter is that most people don't think it's "necessary" to go to war if it involves them. Most of the people of the world never experience war and never have and seem to get along pretty good without that "necessity".

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
87. Wouild you agree that it was necessary to go to war in 2001?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:29 PM
Sep 2012

Or, 1861? Or, 1775? Or, 1914? Or, 1964? Or, all of the other wars, incursions, and other metaphors for killing other people?

As for 1941. I don't know if it was "necessary".

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
92. i would say that id prefer to live in a europe after the marshal plan
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:42 PM
Sep 2012

Than a europe under the himmler or beria plan so yeah i think it was a good thing

99. If you're uncertain about whether it was necessary to go to war in 1941
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:42 PM
Sep 2012

that suggests that your opinions on both war and peace are not really worth reading.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
103. I'll second what demosforprogress has to say
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 05:36 PM
Sep 2012

1775, 1861, 1941

If you're "uncertain" about it, your opinion isn't worth listening to.

And would "I" have gone? Damn right I would have.

EX500rider

(10,810 posts)
115. Hmmmm...yes to most of those
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 08:14 PM
Sep 2012

2001... Taliban sheltering the perpetrators of 9/11 is a cause for war....necessary is a matter of opinion
1861...worth freeing the slave and preserving the union
1775....worth our independence
1914...worth the German Imperial Empire not taking over all of Europe + the sinking of the Lusitania killed US citizens
1964...not so much although taking sides in the Cold War not surprising
1941....yes, Japan started a war with us and stopping the Nazi's certainly worthwhile

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
117. You don't know if WW2 was necessary?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 10:08 PM
Sep 2012

Unfuckinbelievable. You don't think stopping the holocaust, stopping Germany, Japan, Italy from dominating the world and imposing tyranny was worthwhile?
Then this conversation is done.

 

2on2u

(1,843 posts)
59. With the caps melting, soon enough the only thing they will be doing is this.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:57 PM
Sep 2012

Not to mention dropping water on drought driven wildfires.






 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
46. Disarm them? Why?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:28 PM
Sep 2012

They were built for a specific reason and mission, why de-fang them? You may not like what their purpose is but we do need those in our arsenal.

And they are used for other purposes, the Blackhawks and Chinooks are great for delivering aid to those in disaster areas, evacuations, delivering personal to places inaccessible to fixed wing aircraft.
They're very versatile aircraft.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
50. The cargo helos don't need to be
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:37 PM
Sep 2012

but the escort gunships do to protect the cargo helos. There's nothing like seeing an Apache escorting or flying in circles to protect the helos on the ground to dissuade anyone from attacking them.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
77. Depends on the disaster area.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:59 PM
Sep 2012

Do you have any experience with military disaster and civil relief efforts? Or do you just not watch international news... ever?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
75. UH-60 (Black Hawk), HH-60 (Pave Hawk) and SH-60 (Sea Hawk) helicopters...
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:52 PM
Sep 2012

used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army, Air Force and Navy.

MH-53J/M (Pave Low), CH-35D (Sea Stallion) and CH-53E (Super Stallion) helicopters, used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy.

CH-47 (Chinook), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army.

UH-46 (Sea Knight), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Marine Corps.

UH-1 (Iroquois), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army, Air Force and Marine Corps.

UH-72 (Lakota), used for civilian rescues and disaster relief by the Army.


Note that all of these aircraft can be armed or unarmed, and all have civilian varients used for a variety of purposes.

Next time, I suggest you do 5 minutes of internet searches before proudly displaying your ignorance with such a profound sense of moral superiority.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
76. Pave Hawks
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:56 PM
Sep 2012

aren't those the ones the AF uses to insert and extract Special Forces, and rescue downed pilots behind enemy lines?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
81. Yes. Also used for rescue work, often in Alaska and Washington areas...
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 02:15 PM
Sep 2012

due to the aircrafts' adverse-weather capability and the extreme competence of their crews.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
54. IMO it is intended as a compliment
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:49 PM
Sep 2012

It is not a put down of any kind. I think it plays into right wing hands when we carry victimization memes too far.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
57. It's definitely a compliment
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:54 PM
Sep 2012

It was meant to acknowledge the warrior spirit of the Native American culture. And you're right, sometimes we do carry the victimization too far. I would imagine, by the lack of protest from the Native American population, that they have no problem with this.

sarge43

(28,940 posts)
61. Moreover, some of the Nations created the finest light cavalry forces in the world
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:01 PM
Sep 2012

Fitting the air cavs carrying their names.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
67. And lest we forget
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:18 PM
Sep 2012

During WW2, although not an aviation unit, but Native Americans served honorably as the Wind Talkers with the U.S. Marines.
The movie, Wind Talkers, was an awesome, inspiring movie.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
86. They served in all kinds of capacities
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:17 PM
Sep 2012

In the Canadian army as well, in both world wars. A very interesting novel on this subject is Three Day Road, well worth reading.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
60. Anthrologist Rene Girard termed it, "mimetic envy." People cannabilize the identities of
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:58 PM
Sep 2012

fallen enemies, and act aggressively out of a feeling of cultural inferiority. To appropriate their names makes us feel mighty, as if we ate their brave hearts.

Genocide is rooted in religious rituals, and vis-a-versa.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
64. Some interesting background that I found on this.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:09 PM
Sep 2012

From this site on helicopter history:

The U.S. Army aviation began in Ft. Sill, Oklahoma prior to moving to FT. Rucker, Alabama. Ft. Sill is located in the heart of many native american reservations and in honor of the location they decided to name helicopters after the various indian tribes. The one exception is the Bell AH-1 Cobra which was named such because the army did not want to offend the native americans by naming a gunship after an indian tribe and have the be percieved as an insult. Shortly thereafter many tribal leaders inquired as to why the Army stopped naming helicopters after indians. When the reason was explained the leaders stated that there are many aggressive indian tribes that are fit to name a gunship after which was where the Apache, Kiowa warrior, and formerly the Commanche all got thier names from.


I'm currently attempting to corroborate this information (though my search will have to way for later tonight, as i have to get ready for work), but if it is in fact true, then Mr. Chomsky (EDIT: And a certain poster up thread) would appear to have stepped in it just a tad and owes the Army an apology.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
91. So the naming was intended to honor those First Nation people?
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:42 PM
Sep 2012

I guess that would be acceptable if true. Or would it still be insulting and why?

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
93. i think it would come down to the individual and how they look at it
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:44 PM
Sep 2012

No people are monolithic when it comes to being insulted.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
94. This it's true.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:12 PM
Sep 2012

But still, I'm gonna research this subject some more tonight when I get home from work. I never like to rely in a single source.

But even if it is true, your point still stands

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
95. A U.S. Infantry regiment got permission from Geronimo's descendants to use his name and likeness
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:23 PM
Sep 2012

During WWII the 101st Airborne Division's 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment sought the permission and began using a profile of Geronimo with lightning bolts on its patch. For its regimental crest, the 501st adopted the image of a stylized thunderbird above the 'Geronimo' motto:



The regiment's troops were known as "the Geronimos," something that continued through the VN War and probably to this day (even though the two 501st battalions that remained with the 101st in VN were deactivated after that war, then reactivated for GWOT as part of a different unit.

I've seen reports of tribal leaders participating in the dedicaion ceremonies for helicopters that use tribal names. The names also have to get a lot of approvals, including from the U.S. Patent Office, before adoption:

THE GENERAL policy of naming Army aircraft after Indians tribes, chiefs or terms was made official by authority of Army Regulation (AR) 70-28, dated 4 April 1969. The names were authorized for use in public releases and other documents as a ready reference. The Indian names chosen were very popular among Army personnel for many years.

The Commanding General (CG) of the U.S. Army Aviation Missile Command (AMCOM), located at Redstone Arsenal, near Huntsville, Alabama, had the responsibility of initiating action to select a popular name for an Army aircraft. For this purpose, the CG maintained a list of possible names obtained from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. For brevity the names usually consisted of only one word. When a new aircraft reached the production stage, or immediately before it went into production, the CG selected five possible names. The selection decision was based on the sound, the history, and the relationship of the name to the mission of the aircraft.

The names chosen had to appeal to the imagination, without sacrificing dignity, and suggest an aggressive spirit and confidence in the capabilities of the aircraft. They also had to suggest mobility, firepower and endurance. The chosen names were sent to the Trade Mark (™) Division of the U.S. Patent Office to determine if there was any legal objection to their use.

...


After approval by the Patent Office, the five names were sent to the Chief of Research and Development, Department of the Army, with a short justification for each. From these five, the Chief of Research and Development would select one.


The approved name then went to the Aeronautical Systems Division, Directorate of Engineering Standards, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. This Department of Defense unit had the responsibility of officially registering the names of all aircraft used by the U.S. military. It also maintained and printed a list of the names in a publication entitled "Model Designation of Military Aircraft, Rockets and Guided Missiles."


http://www.chinook-helicopter.com/origins/origins.html



 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
101. i think there is a duer who was member of this unit
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 04:55 PM
Sep 2012

Ive seen the geronimo badge in a photo here somewhere though i cant remember who or whee. Kinda interesting

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
107. It's nice to be remembered. :)
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:18 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:47 AM - Edit history (1)

I served with 2/501 Infantry in VN and I've posted the regimental crest both in discussions with other vets here and in last year's threads about the codenames used in the Bin Laden mission.

In the latter discussions I posted some of the history of the insignia and how they all came about because a few paratroopers went to see a movie and were inspired to cry, "Geronimo!" on their next jump.

It was only last year that I linked up with one of the guys from the unit who sent me a photo of us in VN, with a crude rendering of the 'Geronimo' crest on the wall behind us:




The officers of Bravo Co, 2/501 Infantry, 101st Airborne Division, Vietnam - Thanksgiving, 1969

Rear, l to r: Russ Shields, platoon leader (KIA), and our Captain (Company Commander)
Front, l to r: Mark Rivest, platoon leader (KIA), pinboy3niner, platoon leader, and Dan, Executive Officer, holding cup.


I thought the history of the insignia for the unit was interesting, especially because in this case it came from the bottom up, and not from the top down.

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
71. "Blue Thunder"
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:38 PM
Sep 2012

... was an interesting movie about the adaption of the Vietnam era Cobra attack helicopter adapted to police use. The movie turned out to be a statement against the militarization of the police that was way ahead of it's time. I won't give the spoiler in case anyone wants to watch it.



warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
74. I mean the original movie
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 01:50 PM
Sep 2012

... agree the t.v. series was awful. If you like helicopters, you will probably enjoy the movie.

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
118. The Greatest Helicopter Pilot
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:30 AM
Sep 2012

... I can think of is our very own Tammy Duckworth!!!








The only woman in American History to win the Medal of honor was in the Civil War...





'There's no need to see flowers any other way,
than the way they've always been seen"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We still name our helicop...