General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWas anyone disappointed with Bill Clinton's speech last night?
I sure wasn't disappointed.
Brought back some really good memories.
My wife and I sat here in awe.
Don
His speeches have always been to-the-point and refreshingly clear of stale cliches. Last night's was no exception. It was also damned entertaining. Awesome, awesome speech.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)I had to go to bed during his speech, but I did search for his speech and found that he obliquely referred to climate protection when mentioning automobile fuel efficiency standards from last week.
randome
(34,845 posts)But it is the most important dilemma we face today.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)He can talk for hours and do it without notes or tel-prompters. I don't know if he was without teleprompters last night, but I have seen him get up and speak for two hours without a note.
MH1
(17,600 posts)someone commented that it would be hell to be the teleprompter operator for a Clinton speech.
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)because my somewhat moderate husband came in, woke me up, and said "You have GOT to watch President Clinton's speech tomorrow." He recorded it for me.
Auggie
(31,167 posts)Obama's victory over Hillary Clinton in 2008 was hard-fought -- at times bordering on vicious. I don't know how Bill personally feels/felt about lauding Obama now, but he did a masterful job. For the good of the Democratic Party and the USA. Thank you President Clinton.
FSogol
(45,480 posts)Great speech.
Flatpicker
(894 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,515 posts)Skeptical George
(26 posts)Hmm.....
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)I remember planning my vacation one year so I could listen to his State of the Union address while driving. The man is just brilliant!
madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)If he'd have been a little less dog he'd be remembered as the best President we'd had up to this very fine man we have now. When Bill Clinton speaks a lot of people throughout the world listen and when I say a lot I mean a fucking lot.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)And he brought his "A" game last night.
Just fucking amazing. Thank you for that, President Clinton.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)charmay
(525 posts)Joey Scar is looking and acting very disappointed this morning.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Heard it was great
Autumn
(45,057 posts)could have pointed out. But damn, that man can give a speech.
Ms. Toad
(34,065 posts)I was completely stunned when the rave reviews started coming in.
It was ok - but it would not have crossed my mind to suggest it was his best speech ever, or even in the top half of speeches I have heard him give.
I guess different strokes for different folks.
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,065 posts)I listened to most of the speech on the drive home and my reaction was not so much to substance, as it was to style - but it was strong enough reaction that it was interfering with my ability to listen to the substance of the speech. I even turned on the TV when I got home to see if the visual impression matched what I was hearing - that decreased my response a bit, but not enough that I was willing to hang around and listen to the last 10 minutes or so that was left.
Regardless of my reaction - if everyone else is reacting positively to it, it was apparently just what was needed so it doesn't make a bit of difference that I was disappointed.
I actually clicked on this thread with the thought that perhaps I wasn't the only one who was disappointed, only to find it was a teaser from someone with the opposite reaction.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)The Republicans set a pretty low bar this time. Their highlight speaker was a guy mumbling to an empty chair. I still thought Clinton gave a pretty brilliant speech in that it was a near perfect response to what was said during the Republican convention.
Ms. Toad
(34,065 posts)On the other hand, I thought both Michelle Obama and Julian Castro were brilliant both as to substance and style - so part of my reaction to Clinton may have been the contrast with those two.
Gothmog
(145,130 posts)I would normally switch to the Daily Show at ten CDT time but tonight I watched all of the Big Dog's speech. It was great
C_U_L8R
(44,998 posts)Big Dawg coulda kept on talking hahaha
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)Mitt the Nitt to be on 'Face the Nation' Sunday, presumably to criticize Obama's speech and attempt to rebut Clinton's rebuttal. Tall order, attempting to rebut the truth.
What an idiot!
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)He delivers a speech like no other.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)You could see the pained look on their faces...trying to find some tidbit of "fact" that was misplaced or some was they could use "Monica". They couldn't argue with substance...that's no longer an option when you're a teabagger...so you look for that hair to parse, that awkward moment or snippet that can be distorted.
One more disappointement...the rushpublicans who know they get verbally disected last night and don't have anyone in their inept and corrupt party that can hold a candle to Presidents Clinton and Obama...
Cheers...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Im pretty annoyed with Bill Clinton right now; hes just spoiled one of my standard joke lines. You see, when giving talks about the economy, Ive often said that I am have a different take from other pundits, because I know some stuff most political reporters dont, like arithmetic. Ill never be able to use that line again without being accused of stealing it from the Big Dog.
Seriously, that was an awesome speech. Clinton isnt just an amazing political talent; he has the ability to make wonkery accessible and compelling. Of course, he had one major advantage over the supposed wonks on the other side (still shaking my head over the Ryan implosion), namely, the well-known liberal bias of the facts.
But you knew there was going to be a but Clinton did get one thing wrong, which he has persistently gotten wrong for years. Hes stuck on the notion that we have a big structural unemployment problem:
Of course, we need a lot more new jobs. But there are already more than 3 million jobs open and unfilled in America, mostly because the people who apply for them dont yet have the required skills to do them.
Hes been saying this for years. But its not true even Republican economists agree.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/bill-clinton-and-structural-unemployment/
Still, not many people are picking it a part, parsing words and dwelling on semantics.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"In the context of the convention, this isnt important. But I hope that if reelected, Obama wont fall into the structural trap."
I find your characterization of what he wrote to be way, way off base. 'Awesome' = 'picking apart'? And you know, there is a lesson here. When using superlatives, as Krugman does, noting a bit you do not agree with lets the reader know you are listening and honestly reacting, not simply typing 'Awesome job Bill!' Something to ponder.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I find your characterization of what he wrote to be way, way off base."
...I find your faux outrage and intentional distortion of my point to be silly.
Comment title: Krugman had one issue
Generalized observation: Still, not many people are picking it a part, parsing words and dwelling on semantics.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,416 posts)I was that engaged.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)He always gives great speeches.
Response to NNN0LHI (Original post)
limpyhobbler This message was self-deleted by its author.
stlsaxman
(9,236 posts)with a GRAND SLAM HOME RUN!
disappointed? um.... no.