Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:49 PM Aug 2012

Paul Ryan: The term “forcible rape” was “stock language” "End of story"

Paul Ryan: The term “forcible rape” was “stock language”

Responding to Democratic charges that he sought to narrow the definition of rape when he co-sponsored a House measure last year that used the term “forcible rape,” presumptive GOP vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan said Monday that the phrase was “stock language” and that he agreed with its eventual removal from the bill.

“Democrats have been accusing you of trying to redefine rape,” Fox News Channel host Bret Baier said to Ryan in an interview that aired Monday night. “You co-sponsored legislation seeking to distinguish between statutory and forcible rape. Why?”

“Well, look. All of these bills were bills to stop taxpayer financing of abortion,” Ryan said. “Most Americans agree with us, including pro-choice Americans, that we shouldn’t use hardworking taxpayer dollars to finance abortion. Rape is rape, period. This is language that was stock language used for lots of different bills – bills I didn’t author – and that language was removed, to be very clear, and I agree with that, removing that language so we are very clear. Rape is rape, period. End of story.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/08/27/paul-ryan-the-term-forcible-rape-was-stock-language/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Ryan: The term “forcible rape” was “stock language” "End of story" (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Aug 2012 OP
Maybe he should read the bills because the actual words matter. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Aug 2012 #2
What is "stock language"? Is it like B-Roll? TwilightGardener Aug 2012 #3

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
1. Maybe he should read the bills because the actual words matter.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:51 PM
Aug 2012

What a dip-stick.

Honestly, this alone should disqualified this dope from higher office.

Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Ryan: The term “forc...