HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Do other conservatives ou...

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:44 PM

Do other conservatives out there agree with National Review's "Real Men Don't Have Daughters" idea?

I think it's worth asking, it's a major vein of conservative thought, so do conservative icons and legislators agree with National Review when it says "Real Men Don't Have Daughters"?

21 replies, 2292 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply Do other conservatives out there agree with National Review's "Real Men Don't Have Daughters" idea? (Original post)
ck4829 Aug 2012 OP
Ken Burch Aug 2012 #1
gollygee Aug 2012 #2
ck4829 Aug 2012 #3
gollygee Aug 2012 #12
ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #4
ck4829 Aug 2012 #6
ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #11
southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #5
ck4829 Aug 2012 #8
southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #20
hifiguy Aug 2012 #7
broiles Aug 2012 #18
southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #21
lame54 Aug 2012 #9
JaneQPublic Aug 2012 #10
abelenkpe Aug 2012 #13
LadyHawkAZ Aug 2012 #14
ismnotwasm Aug 2012 #15
hughee99 Aug 2012 #16
SoCalDem Aug 2012 #17
Tikki Aug 2012 #19

Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:46 PM

1. Do they drown them in the river at birth?

Or is NR coming out in favor of abortion for gender selection purposes?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:47 PM

2. Do you have a link?

Is this because Obama has daughters? Huh? It's pretty random . . .

Odd

(Signed, a mom of two daughters, with a husband whom I believe is a 'real man')

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to ck4829 (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:53 PM

12. Ok well that's all kinds of crazy



I am going out on a limb and guessing that Republicans and Democrats have the same general ratio of sons to daughters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:48 PM

4. Do you have a link to the article? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to ck4829 (Reply #6)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:53 PM

11. Thanks, a google search for the phrase didn't work for me. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:49 PM

5. Is this a joke? really is it? Cause if it isn't boy is the republican party of the wrong track of

 

life. Remember fellas behind every great man is a woman pushing him to be great. Damn give her credit. But then again why in the hell would any woman want to be with thinkers like that if it is true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to southernyankeebelle (Reply #5)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:51 PM

8. They are 100% serious

Cover article of their latest edition.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Reply #8)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 06:30 PM

20. OMG how sick. I wonder what are they going to do if they have a daughter? Kill them like

 

they do in some foreign countries? Just wondering. I would love to know what kind of mothers gave birth to this cancerous idiots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:50 PM

7. I guess ole Chimpy ain't no real man then

Two daughters. No sons.

Same goes for LBJ and Nixon. Two daughters each.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hifiguy (Reply #7)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:53 PM

18. Same for Cheney

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to broiles (Reply #18)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 06:32 PM

21. Hell Cheney is no man in the first place. He is a chicken. When he was called to duty he made

 

sure he didn't go. He is nothing more then a chicken hawk.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:52 PM

9. What's the point of having 5 strapping young lads if...

None of them are willing to fight in the wars that you're party is so willing to wage

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:53 PM

10. Dubya, Dick Cheney, Richard Nixon, John McCain -- all son-less. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:55 PM

13. I doubt it

Sounds like the idiotic ramblings of a right wing fool paid to fill a page with misogynist/bigoted anti Obama baloney channeling the mideval ages probably due to watching too many reruns of game of thrones.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:58 PM

14. The idea that real men only produce boys

is about as old as the discovery that the really fun boinky thing Ugg did with Ooma was what made her belly swell up. Since (R)s get most of their sex ed from that era anyway, this sort of came along for the ride.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:00 PM

15. Ew

I don't know but it explains why they want to treat women as automatic fetus incubators.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:06 PM

16. John Wayne had 4 daughters,

Raygun had 3 daughters, Glen Beck has a couple, and Paul Ryan has one as well. Is anyone repuke going to suggest that they aren't "real men"?

That's going to be a tough argument to make, since many conservatives have daughters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 05:43 PM

17. Here's an interesting scientific article about this

http://pregnancy.about.com/od/genderselection/Sex_Selection_How_to_choose_a_girl_or_boy_for_your_next_baby.htm

how to have a boy..how to have a girl..

from a cursory reading, MORE sex, seems to favor having a girl..and invoilves sweets & chocolate

..............................


and the more science-y article

http://www.science20.com/news_releases/chromosomes_are_so_20th_century_male_genes_really_determine_baby_gender_says_study

Chromosomes Are So 20th Century - Male Genes Really Determine Baby Gender, Says Study

By News Staff | December 14th 2008 01:00 AM | Print | E-mail | Track


Men determine the sex of a baby depending on whether their sperm is carrying an X or Y chromosome. An X chromosome combines with the mother's X chromosome to make a baby girl (XX) and a Y chromosome will combine with the mother's to make a boy (XY).

A Newcastle University study suggests that an as-yet undiscovered gene controls whether a man's sperm contains more X or more Y chromosomes, which affects the sex of his children. On a larger scale, the number of men with more X sperm compared to the number of men with more Y sperm affects the sex ratio of children born each year


snip

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ck4829 (Original post)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 06:04 PM

19. You couldn't be more Liberal than the Mr.and me...No daughters...

I've always wondered if I might have been a good mother to a daughter.
what she might have looked like,
I, also, had no sisters.
Sons Rock but so do Daughters.


The Tikkis

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread