General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEd Gillespie: Mitt's plan to convert Medicare to a voucher system raises elibility age to 67
By Aviva Shen
Earlier this week, Mitt Romney pledged to restore Obamacares savings in the Medicare program a move that would move up the insolvency date of the programs trust fund from 2024 to 2016.
On Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace asked Romney senior adviser Ed Gillespie how the campaign would extend the life of the program if the Romney-Ryan reforms wont kick in until 2023, long after Medicare reached insolvency. Gillespie replied by insisting that a Romney administration would raise the age eligibility to 67:
WALLACE: But the problem is, those reforms dont kick in until 2023. It doesnt affect any seniors or anybody close to being a senior. But that doesnt solve the Medicare part A problem which kicks in in 2016. What are you going to do to keep solvent between 2016, after you have repealed Obamacare, and 2023?
GILLESPIE: Governor Romney supports increasing over time bringing Medicare eligibility in line with the Social Security retirement age The Congressional Budget Office says assumptions about the Medicare trust fund being solvent through 2024 under the Obamacare proposal is unrealistic.
Watch it:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/19/711011/romney-adviser-says-gop-would-extend-medicares-solvency-by-raising-the-eligibility-age/
Krugman: Whats In The Ryan Plan?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021142015
The Obama campaign goes digital on Mitt's regressive whiteboard lies. (updated)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021149847
warrior1
(12,325 posts)This is really anyone needs to know about mitt.
democrat_patriot
(2,774 posts)How can anyone over 5?
Can we just call this over now. No need for the week long racist hate fest in Tampa.
flamingdem
(39,308 posts)they'll get zero.. in other words they're after the low-info younger voter with this -- or more of the senior vote
democrat_patriot
(2,774 posts)global1
(25,224 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)We'll see if the Obama campaign pushes back against Romney on the age increase. If they don't...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Stop campaigning for Mitt.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)e.g.:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/11/obama-medicare-eligibility-age_n_894833.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-the-obama-administration-is-open-to-raising-the-medicare-age/2011/07/11/gIQA7sTiaI_blog.html
http://swampland.time.com/2011/07/23/the-inside-story-of-obama-and-boehners-second-failed-grand-bargain/
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/white-house-we-thought-we-were-down-to-the-details.php
Obama has proposed some bad things, such as cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits. And "free" trade. Etc.
So while Obama is basically a return to Herbert Hoover, Romney/Ryan would be a Hell unlike anything we've known in the history of our country.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)It's "widely reported" that Mitt is a good guy.
"Obama has proposed some bad things, such as cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits. And "free" trade. Etc. "
Got a link to the Obama proposals you cite here?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security."
Who said that?
This did not happen, eh?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Who said that?
...smart enough to know that a quote that has nothing to do with cuts to benefits or increasing the retirement age, which is what is being discussed, is not a proposal.
The OP is about Mitt's actual proposal, documented, analyzed, reiterated and proudly supported.
If you cannot link to an actual proposal by the President Obama, then all you're doing is drawing false equivalencies between the President and Mitt.
Is that your intention?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2012083316/game-changer-biden-guarantees-no-changes-social-security
FYI
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But I remember the promise of a public option...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Who said that?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Who said that?
...up the public option. Do you remember how it was slammed because it was projected to apply to 10 million people?
Well, directly related to many Medicare recipients, is the biggest expansion of Medicaid since the law was enacted.
16 million: number of Americans who become eligible for Medicaid under the health care law
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002531684
SCOTUS ruling on health care law a huge win for Medicaid
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002868894
States stand to lose a lot more than Medicaid funding by refusing the expansion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002914241
Six governors say they will opt out of Medicaid. How long will they hold out?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002923048
Rick Perry Factors Into State Budget Obamacare Funds He Had Pledged To Reject
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021083668
Is there a false equivalency about how Romney did it too?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 19, 2012, 06:33 PM - Edit history (1)
No.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)The rich clearly don't have enough money. Thus the rest of us must pay more, die faster and get paid less. This is the republican way.
flamingdem
(39,308 posts)RagAss
(13,832 posts)The stench gives these reptiles strength !!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)marlakay
(11,425 posts)who can afford regular insurance in their 60's? especially if they got rid of obamacare then help to pay would be gone.
We have insurance and just the 20% we have to pay and the deductibles and all of the stuff it doesn't cover is hurting us
and we are 56 & 62.