Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:04 PM Aug 2012

Ed Gillespie: Mitt's plan to convert Medicare to a voucher system raises elibility age to 67

Romney Adviser Says GOP Would Extend Medicare’s Solvency By Raising The Eligibility Age

By Aviva Shen

Earlier this week, Mitt Romney pledged to restore Obamacare’s savings in the Medicare program — a move that would move up the insolvency date of the program’s trust fund from 2024 to 2016.

On Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace asked Romney senior adviser Ed Gillespie how the campaign would extend the life of the program if the Romney-Ryan reforms won’t kick in until 2023, long after Medicare reached insolvency. Gillespie replied by insisting that a Romney administration would raise the age eligibility to 67:

WALLACE: But the problem is, those reforms don’t kick in until 2023. It doesn’t affect any seniors or anybody close to being a senior. But that doesn’t solve the Medicare part A problem which kicks in in 2016. What are you going to do to keep solvent between 2016, after you have repealed Obamacare, and 2023?

GILLESPIE: Governor Romney supports increasing over time bringing Medicare eligibility in line with the Social Security retirement age … The Congressional Budget Office says assumptions about the Medicare trust fund being solvent through 2024 under the Obamacare proposal is unrealistic.

Watch it:

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/19/711011/romney-adviser-says-gop-would-extend-medicares-solvency-by-raising-the-eligibility-age/


Krugman: What’s In The Ryan Plan?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021142015

The Obama campaign goes digital on Mitt's regressive whiteboard lies. (updated)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021149847

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ed Gillespie: Mitt's plan to convert Medicare to a voucher system raises elibility age to 67 (Original Post) ProSense Aug 2012 OP
that's the kiss of death for mitt's campagne warrior1 Aug 2012 #1
How can anyone under 55 vote for this? democrat_patriot Aug 2012 #5
They are convincing younger voters that if they don't raise the age and make cuts flamingdem Aug 2012 #9
Which hopefully is like 10% of the vote... democrat_patriot Aug 2012 #21
And How Many Kisses Of Death For Mitt's Campaign Have We Had So Far?......nt global1 Aug 2012 #6
Obama seems to have also proposed this age increase last year MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #7
No, he didn't, and Romney-Ryan's plan is an actual proposal. ProSense Aug 2012 #8
It was widely reported. And anyone who's sane and thinking will vote for Obama. MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #10
You may not know this, but "widely reported" isn't an actual proposal ProSense Aug 2012 #11
"We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs... MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #18
I know you're ProSense Aug 2012 #22
Game Changer: Biden Guarantees No Changes in Social Security ProSense Aug 2012 #12
I hope it's true MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #13
It came straight from Biden's mouth, unlike "widely reported" n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #14
"Any plan I sign must include... a public option" MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #17
Since you brought ProSense Aug 2012 #19
"Do you remember how it was slammed because it was projected to apply to 10 million people?" MannyGoldstein Aug 2012 #20
Yeah, because insurers are clamoring to insure those 65 year olds! n2doc Aug 2012 #2
I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup.. flamingdem Aug 2012 #3
They want dead bodies in the fucking streets !!! RagAss Aug 2012 #4
Yet the GOP/media shills were offended by the Soptic ad. n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #15
I guess they figure most will die and not need it by then marlakay Aug 2012 #16

democrat_patriot

(2,774 posts)
5. How can anyone under 55 vote for this?
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:11 PM
Aug 2012

How can anyone over 5?

Can we just call this over now. No need for the week long racist hate fest in Tampa.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
9. They are convincing younger voters that if they don't raise the age and make cuts
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:21 PM
Aug 2012

they'll get zero.. in other words they're after the low-info younger voter with this -- or more of the senior vote

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
7. Obama seems to have also proposed this age increase last year
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:13 PM
Aug 2012

We'll see if the Obama campaign pushes back against Romney on the age increase. If they don't...

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
11. You may not know this, but "widely reported" isn't an actual proposal
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 01:55 PM
Aug 2012

It's "widely reported" that Mitt is a good guy.

"Obama has proposed some bad things, such as cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits. And "free" trade. Etc. "

Got a link to the Obama proposals you cite here?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
18. "We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs...
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:20 PM
Aug 2012

"We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security."

Who said that?

This did not happen, eh?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
22. I know you're
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 08:36 PM
Aug 2012
"We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security."

Who said that?

...smart enough to know that a quote that has nothing to do with cuts to benefits or increasing the retirement age, which is what is being discussed, is not a proposal.

The OP is about Mitt's actual proposal, documented, analyzed, reiterated and proudly supported.

If you cannot link to an actual proposal by the President Obama, then all you're doing is drawing false equivalencies between the President and Mitt.

Is that your intention?



ProSense

(116,464 posts)
19. Since you brought
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:27 PM
Aug 2012
"Any plan I sign must include... a public option"

Who said that?

...up the public option. Do you remember how it was slammed because it was projected to apply to 10 million people?

Well, directly related to many Medicare recipients, is the biggest expansion of Medicaid since the law was enacted.

16 million: number of Americans who become eligible for Medicaid under the health care law
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002531684

SCOTUS ruling on health care law a huge win for Medicaid
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002868894

States stand to lose a lot more than Medicaid funding by refusing the expansion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002914241

Six governors say they will opt out of Medicaid. How long will they hold out?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002923048

Rick Perry Factors Into State Budget Obamacare Funds He Had Pledged To Reject
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021083668

Is there a false equivalency about how Romney did it too?


 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
20. "Do you remember how it was slammed because it was projected to apply to 10 million people?"
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 05:08 PM
Aug 2012

Last edited Sun Aug 19, 2012, 06:33 PM - Edit history (1)

No.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. Yeah, because insurers are clamoring to insure those 65 year olds!
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 12:08 PM
Aug 2012

The rich clearly don't have enough money. Thus the rest of us must pay more, die faster and get paid less. This is the republican way.

marlakay

(11,425 posts)
16. I guess they figure most will die and not need it by then
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 02:38 PM
Aug 2012

who can afford regular insurance in their 60's? especially if they got rid of obamacare then help to pay would be gone.

We have insurance and just the 20% we have to pay and the deductibles and all of the stuff it doesn't cover is hurting us…and we are 56 & 62.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ed Gillespie: Mitt's plan...