Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:43 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
Debating a proposal to privatize the post office,Last edited Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:49 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
5:55 pm ET C-Span.
|
25 replies, 1356 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| madinmaryland | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| madinmaryland | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #17 | |
| madinmaryland | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| fusilier0770 | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| HopeHoops | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| madinmaryland | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #21 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | Aug 2012 | #22 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #23 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | Aug 2012 | #24 | |
| lonestarnot | Aug 2012 | #25 |
Response to lonestarnot (Original post)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:53 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
1. That would require a Constitutional Amendment (no chance of that happening)
|
Last edited Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:54 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 of the United States Constitution, known as the Postal Clause or the Postal Power, empowers Congress "To establish Post Offices and post Roads". They would have to amend the Constitution to convert it to a private entity. Fuck off rMoney.
It just isn't going to happen. The problem is that Congress imposed the burden of pension extension on the USPS (something no private shipper has to deal with) and THAT'S why they are in financial trouble. Prior to that they always ran a surplus. When a private company will come up with a deal where they'll take an envelope from my house in PA to HI for forty-five cents, I'll consider changing my mind on the issue. That isn't going to happen either. Priority mail is the cheapest and safest way to ship anything shy of seventy pounds. More than that, you need UPS. Congress has no power to privatize the USPS. See paragraph one of the body of this text. That's directly out of the Constitution. On Edit: |
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #1)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:54 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
2. It's on now. Someone name R Richard Geddes Cornell University American Enterprise Institute private
|
Last edited Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:55 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) pusher.
|
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #2)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:55 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
3. It can't happen. It's a distraction from rMoney's problems and nothing more.
|
Last edited Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:57 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) On Edit: To clarify, they can't get 60 votes in the Senate and they can't get 2/3 of the states to ratify it. It's a distraction issue and they know it. The US government is bound by the Constitution to keep the USPS alive, but the GOP has been caving to the corporate bastards for so long now that I'm not sure I know what kind of diapers I was wearing when they were well into it (but I think they were cloth).
|
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #3)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:56 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
4. They are sure drooling over it.
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #4)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:58 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
5. I'd like for one of the GOP asswipes to actually READ THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION!
|
I've got two copies of it within arms' reach. They've got no clue what it says, or what it means for that matter.
|
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #5)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:01 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
6. He knows who has control over that apparently, but still discussing all the real property assets and
|
equipment housed in the facilities and its value. Asshat fuckwad!
|
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #6)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:05 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
8. As for the 2nd, that's what ARMORIES were established for.
|
He doesn't have a fucking clue about history, and rMoney doesn't care. All they want is power. Fuck that noise.
|
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #5)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:01 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
7. Caller giving him the bidness now. I'd like to slap the smile off that fucker's face.
|
Last edited Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:02 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #7)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:06 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
9. I'd just moon him - like full truck-nutz moon stuff. "TEABAG THIS, FUCKER!"
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #5)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:07 PM
madinmaryland (52,925 posts)
10. You don't recall that the Constitution was shredded during the * misadministration??
|
What constitution???
|
Response to madinmaryland (Reply #10)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:15 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
12. You know, that flimsy piece of paper with the John Hancock on it.
|
Not that Republicans would know what that was.
|
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #12)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:22 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
13. "Just a goddamn piece of paper." GWB Bushitler
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #13)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:24 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
14. The shrub can't read.
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #14)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:29 PM
madinmaryland (52,925 posts)
15. Uhmm. He was able to read the words on a bottle of Jack Daniels. nt
Response to madinmaryland (Reply #15)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:36 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
17. From the inside.
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #17)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:37 PM
madinmaryland (52,925 posts)
19. Even more impressive!!
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #5)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:33 PM
fusilier0770 (12 posts)
16. Throw the Paultards and other "strict Constitutionalists" in that group as well
|
I have found the biggest loudmouths when it comes to spouting off about what the Constitution actually says are the ones with the least inkling of what it actually contains. To continue to be blissfully, if not criminally, ignorant is to let some squeaky voiced old baby doctor tell you that the reason the Founding Fathers got together was because the Articles of Confederation were not libertarian enough, hence the Constitution.
|
Response to fusilier0770 (Reply #16)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:37 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
18. Buy them a copy. Amazon has them for about 7 bucks.
Response to fusilier0770 (Reply #16)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:39 PM
madinmaryland (52,925 posts)
20. Welcome to DU!! BTW, the word "tard" is not used here. The preferred phrases are...
|
Paulturds or Paulbots.
|
Response to lonestarnot (Original post)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:12 PM
Egalitarian Thug (7,140 posts)
11. There is no company, nor combination of companies, that could come close to doing
|
what the USPS does. We would have to simply give these welfare queens hundreds of billions of free dollars so that they could charge us $5 to mail a letter.
Another manufactured crisis to bring in the rubes. |
Response to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #11)
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:43 AM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
21. Can you imagine how fucked up the mail would be if they manage to steal it?
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #21)
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:15 PM
Egalitarian Thug (7,140 posts)
22. Yes. We have several models of the clusterfuck these parasites would create. n/t
Response to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #22)
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 11:03 AM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
23. Yet bunches of postal workers will still vote for taxivader.
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #23)
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:01 PM
Egalitarian Thug (7,140 posts)
24. Indeed they will. I'm not sure it's a majority, but at the very least it's close to half.
|
And since I do a lot of work for the government I can attest to a similar situation in the SSA and, BLM as well as the USPS.
|
Response to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #24)
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 10:03 AM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)

